Caolan McMahon scripsit:
> I'm hoping to write (or encourage someone else to write) a memory-only
> implementation of the 'level' API, which would be useful for testing
> or other circumstances where you want to use a module written to the
> 'level' interface without persisting data.
It would be
>> I'm hoping to write (or encourage someone else to write) a
>memory-only
>> implementation of the 'level' API, which would be useful for testing
>> or other circumstances where you want to use a module written to the
>> 'level' interface without persisting data.
>
>Sounds useful. And perhaps s
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Caolan McMahon wrote:
> I published leveldb bindings a while ago. It turns out the
> implementation had some issues with mangled keys in some
> circumstances. I've now fixed these issues and created some additional
> eggs to compliment leveldb. The new eggs
I published leveldb bindings a while ago. It turns out the
implementation had some issues with mangled keys in some
circumstances. I've now fixed these issues and created some additional
eggs to compliment leveldb. The new eggs are as follows:
level - provides the leveldb interface (put/get etc)
h
