uration/cube-book/voi-cube-overview.html
>
> <http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/voi-cube-overview.html>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
>
> From: avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:49:26 +
&
adng;
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/voi-cube-overview.html
Thanks,
Ryan
From: avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:49:26 +
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip design question
To: ryanh...@outlook.com; wo...@justfamily.org
>
> Some of those are significant caveats though (SDP passthru being a
> possible deal killer for me); almost makes just doing plain old HSRP and
> setting the client expectation for failover seem just as reasonable.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
>
> > From: wo...
he
client expectation for failover seem just as reasonable.
Thanks,
Ryan
> From: wo...@justfamily.org
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:17:45 -0600
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip design question
> To: ryanh...@outlook.com
> CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>
> Per this:
> http://www.cis
ailability.html#concept_5013D60352C446769D62736C8CDE87E8
> which seems to suggest that L2 box to box is possible on the 4451.
>
> Are you saying it is not?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
>> From: wo...@justfamily.org
>> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:59:34 -0600
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-vo
suggest that L2 box to box is possible on the 4451.
Are you saying it is not?
Thanks,
Ryan
> From: wo...@justfamily.org
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:59:34 -0600
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip design question
> To: ryanh...@outlook.com
> CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>
> Ple
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought cube-ha was missing from
the code on these? same as the ASR's since they are all running
ios-xe.
I have not tested it myself, just doing a lot of reading in
preparation of deploying these.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> I have a
I have a pair of cubes on 4000 series ISRs. I want to do cube-ha on the ccm
facing side and the itsp facing side.
1.) Am I better off just doing HSRP on both sides (which is 70% of cube-ha
anyway) or is it practical to do the connected call failover portion?
2.) If I include the connected call
