For some time now, there's been discussion of ending production of 32 bit cloud
images. Dusty's been kind enough to create a ticket regarding this matter[1].
Thoughts on this? +1/+0/-1? There could be a reason that we shouldn't stop
producing 32 bit images that someone hasn't voiced yet. We can
Hi all!
We've received[1] only +1's (and plenty of them!) to move the weekly Cloud SIG
meeting 2 hours earlier. Until further notice, the meeting will be held at 1700
UTC on Wednesdays[2].
Congratulations to Kushal and the everyone else on that side of the rock. You
can turn off your coffee po
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Brockmeier"
> To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 12:25:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [Cloud WG] meeting time change request
>
> On 06/10/2015 02:54 PM, Haïkel wrote:
> > I request that we change the meeting time to 5PM UTC.
> > It s
- Original Message -
> From: "Haïkel"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:54:56 AM
> Subject: [Cloud WG] meeting time change request
>
> Hi,
>
> I request that we change the meeting time to 5PM UTC.
> It should be fine for most of us, and we can't keep that curr
Hi all,
We're a bit short on bodies today. A lot of people are out. So, no meeting this
week.
Also, the meeting is quite late for folks like Kushal, who usually runs the
meeting (12:30 AM his time). Make sure to vote on Haïkel's proposal to move the
meeting two hours earlier[1], which should w
Good morning, everyone.
You'll find the final RC2 AMIs in any region by doing a search for
"Fedora-Cloud-Base-22-20150520" or "Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-22-20150520". Let me
know if there are any issues.
-- David
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedorapro
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 6:43:03 AM
> Subject: AMI ids for F22 final RC2?
>
> I know these are in fedmsg somewhere or something, but for testers'
> convenience, what are the AMI ids for RC2?
>
> --
> Matthew Mi
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: j...@redhat.com, "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Cc: atomic-de...@projectatomic.io
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 7:59:16 AM
> Subject: Re: Screen in F22 Atomic?
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 02:45:25AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Did I miss so
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: j...@redhat.com, "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:40:26 PM
> Subject: atomic and getfedora
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:58:28AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > >> That works for me. Any volunteers for actually
Hi,
Just a heads up to all my cloud friends that I'll be on PTO tomorrow (Thursday)
and off on Red Hat company holiday on Friday. I'll try to keep myself available
in IRC in case I'm needed, but will otherwise be on a brief vacation.
-- David
___
clou
- Original Message -
> From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 5:31:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Testables for beta TC2
>
> Yeah - that's what I'm looking for. I must have missed an announcement.
- Original Message -
> From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:25:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Testables for beta TC2
>
> Is there going to be a new Atomic image soon? I've done pretty much
> all I can with TC2 - I got everything working except C
- Original Message -
> From: "Jay Greguske"
> To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 2:07:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [FINAL CONFIRMATION] Deleting pre-F21 AMIs
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On
Greetings.
As one of the things discussed in the "AMI lifetimes" thread this month, I
would like to delete all Alpha, Beta, TC, RC, and other scratch AMIs pre-F21
from *both* our community cloud and official AWS accounts.
I've gotten a +1 via list, and two +1s in the meeting today. There have b
- Original Message -
> From: "milanisko k"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 7:52:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora EC2 Amis: SriovNetSupport
>
> That would be one way.
> However, since it actually is a majority of the instance types[1] that
> support this feature, I'd vo
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Cc: desk...@lists.fedoraproject.org, ser...@lists.fedoraproject.org,
> k...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 2:25:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Password policy changes
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:3
- Original Message -
> From: "Pete Travis"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" , j...@redhat.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 11:04:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora Cloud Docs
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 24, 2015 11:38 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" < j...@redhat.com > wrote:
> >
> > On 03/24/2015 01:01 PM, Jared K. S
Cool, thanks for the input everyone. A short summary of what's been discussed:
1. Everyone seems to agree that we should hope to get usage data from AWS, but
as Dennis mentioned (and I expect), there isn't any usage data available for
AMIs. If there is such a console, I've never seen one.
2. Q:
Greetings!
We sort of ran out of time in today's Cloud WG meeting, but I did want to ask:
What are your thoughts on AMI lifetimes? That is to say, how long should EC2
AMIs exist before they're deleted? A few points to consider:
- AMIs only cost us for storage, so it's not a *huge* cost to maint
- Original Message -
> From: "Mike Ruckman"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 11:29:28 AM
> Subject: dnf migration period
>
> Greetings fellow cloudies!
>
> This bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201655) spawned a
> conversation on IRC that we thoug
Greetings!
Attached is a list of F22 Cloud AMIs for the latest image build done today.
They could use some testing love!
-- David
f22_cloud_amis_20150309.txt.gpg
Description: application/pgp-encrypted
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.o
Greetings, and congratulations on F22 Alpha!
Attached is a list of official F22 Alpha AMIs. Robyduck will take care of
putting them on the website.
-- David
f22_cloud_alpha_amis.txt.gpg
Description: application/pgp-encrypted
___
cloud mailing list
clo
Greetings.
If we want the vagrant images to be listed on the prerelease page, the web team
needs some text to put with them, like we do for the other images. I pinged a
few vagrant-connected folks in IRC, but it seems they're not around. Assuming
we *do* want these images listed, can someone wi
Attention, civilians:
I have attached for you a list of standard AMIs for F22 Alpha TC8. Test away.
Also, this will hopefully be one of the last times I need to manually write
these down and email them to you. At long last, the latest AMIs should soon
appear on the releng-dash[1], under Cloud I
- Original Message -
> From: "Dusty Mabe"
> To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 7:19:09 AM
> Subject: Re: Fresh AMIs (official Fedora acct, min vol size)
>
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:00:27PM -0500, David Gay wrote:
> > H
Hello, cloud friends.
I've attached a signed list of fresh AMIs for the images we provide through
[1]. If no one sees any problems here, we could ask someone from the web team
to update that page with these new AMIs.
Notables:
- These AMIs were registered on the *official* Fedora AWS account,
- Original Message -
> From: "Dmitry Makovey"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:50:52 AM
> Subject: Re: EC2 cloud image size
>
> On 01/02/2015 05:46 PM, David Gay wrote:
> > Hey -- I actually solved this problem du
ash: SHA1
>
> On 01/08/2015 04:20 PM, David Gay wrote:
> > Hey nerds,
> >
> > I've got Fedimg properly registering cloud base images as both HVM
> > and PV. (I also added multithreading to the upload process!)
> > Previously, base images were only availabl
- Original Message -
> From: "David Gay"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 4:46:44 PM
> Subject: Re: EC2 cloud image size
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Dmitry Makovey"
> > To: &quo
Hey nerds,
I've got Fedimg properly registering cloud base images as both HVM and PV. (I
also added multithreading to the upload process!) Previously, base images were
only available as PV. Now, base images are available in both formats. (Atomic
images will never be available in PV, as they req
- Original Message -
> From: "Dmitry Makovey"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 3:02:20 PM
> Subject: Re: EC2 cloud image size
>
> On 12/17/2014 02:09 PM, David Gay wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote:
> > Does it mean that "soon enough" we'll see an updated AMI with moderate
> > disk demands?
>
> For some value of "soon enough", yeah. Sorry about that -- I'm checking
> with
> On 12/04/2014 09:38 AM, David Gay wrote:
> > Sorry that I wasn't able to attend the WG meeting yesterday -- I was on
> > a flight to Raleigh. I'm at Red Hat Tower for a MirrorManager 2 /
> > Infrastructure FAD. I'll be here until the 9th. I should be in IRC as
Hi all,
Sorry that I wasn't able to attend the WG meeting yesterday -- I was on a
flight to Raleigh. I'm at Red Hat Tower for a MirrorManager 2 / Infrastructure
FAD. I'll be here until the 9th. I should be in IRC as normal for most of the
time. We hope to do some work on Fedimg during this time
TC4 x86_64 base and atomic AMIs are now available in all EC2 regions.
For those of you unaware, I've taken to adding AMI IDs for our purposes on the
wiki, at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Images. I figured it was a better
place than my Fedora People page or personal website. Feel free to
Hi all,
I've attached a signed text file containing a list of AMIs for the recent
Atomic-20141112-21.x86_64 build.
The Koji task for this build can be found here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8118904
Please let me know if there are any issues, or further action I can take
Good news, everyone!
Both base and atomic AMIs seem to be working properly (x86_64). As per our
previous discussion, the 32 bit cloud base image needs to be rebuilt due to a
PAE kernel problem, so that won't be available for now.
robyduck has said that he'll be able to add the AMI IDs to the of
> One slight problem I just realized is that Daylight Savings ends on
> November 2nd so this may change some member's availability.
Bit late on this one, but that time works fine for me regardless of the DST
change. :)
-- oddshocks
___
cloud mailing li
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Brockmeier"
> To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 2:47:00 PM
> Subject: Re: 32 bit AMI registration boot problem: explaination and possible
> solutions
>
> On 11/03/2014 04:43 PM, David Gay
Andy:
> > 2. You cannot have an instance that is both 32 bit architecture and
> > EBS-optimized.
>
> "EBS-optimized" is just a storage performance thing, and has nothing
> to do with whether the image boots.
Yeah, that's fine. What I was saying is simply that there are no instance types
in
Hi -- these beta AMIs need to be done today. 64 bit base AMIs have been
successfully uploaded, but I *still* haven't nailed the problem with the 32 bit
registration method. Or rather, I've isolated the problem, but haven't found a
solution. Searching the net has not been going well with this par
Hey --
An update on progress with the ostree/atomic work:
lmacken has written up a Fedmsg-triggered composer that runs ostree composes
when repos are updated: https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg-atomic-composer.
As of our conversation earlier today, it's almost ready for testing in stg.
We'
Hi --
At this point, I thought I'd send out an email with my current understanding of
the processes we need to add to the releng scripts for ostree, as well as some
questions regarding these compose scripts, specifically:
- buildbranched
[https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/b
> I'm doing a new compose now, and it does have bash-4.3.24-2.fc22.
> (Which, AIUI, may not actually fix everything per
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2014-September/122976.html
> ...but we'll keep the trees flowing)
Hey -- any chance you can send me the Koji IDs for the createIm
44 matches
Mail list logo
