On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 05/16/2011 12:37 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 05/14/2011 01:04 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Any news on this one? We're currently building more tools
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 05/14/2011 01:04 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Any news on this one? We're currently building more tools, so it would
be cool to know when we can expect this to be more easily available.
If there's more work to do on my side
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Oliver Buchtala oliver.bucht...@jku.at wrote:
Hi Alex, Manuel, and other interested watchers,
I'd like to introduce a preview version of an Eclipse plugin
'CMakeWorkbench' which is combined with the CMake CDT7 generator
developed lately.
I try to reduce user
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Manuel Klimek kli...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Oliver Buchtala oliver.bucht...@jku.at
wrote:
Hi Alex, Manuel, and other interested watchers,
I'd like to introduce a preview version of an Eclipse plugin
'CMakeWorkbench' which
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday 28 April 2011, Oliver Buchtala wrote:
...
wst-file is allright and I see that all projects are generated :)
Unfortunately, this working set stuff is yet a bit inconvenient, as it
is not an Eclipse
Pulling in a few more people (suggested audience from Sergey), please
tell me if I'm CC'ing a list that doesn't make sense.
Context:
Oliver is currently working on making eclipse support for CMake a lot
better. I heard that Andrew is working on configuration of includes
and defines in eclipse, so
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 12:13 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 08:33 AM, Brad King wrote:
On 04/04/2011 12:01 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Done.
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/25/2011 11:54 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Is just putting IF(UNIX) ... around all the stuff enough for that?
It's not just the test. The C++ implementation cannot handle all
generators. It should be taught to run
For your convenience, rebased onto current head and git format-patch'ed.
Cheers,
/Manuel
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Manuel Klimek kli...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/04/2011 12:01 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Done.
Thanks
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 08:33 AM, Brad King wrote:
On 04/04/2011 12:01 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Done.
Thanks!
While running the test on more platforms I ran into a problem. On
Windows makefile tools like Borland and NMake we use
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 04/04/2011 12:01 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Done.
Thanks!
I also have the previous patches ready (re-based with master). Let me
know how we'll go on about submitting all that.
I still have them on a local topic branch
20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 1/19/2011 9:07 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
So the question is: do you want to run this test as part of the
dashboard clients?
Yes, we do. Please implement the test in C++ using the hints I
sent previously.
Thanks,
-Brad
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:08 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 1/18/2011 1:50 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Since this is a big integration style test, is it also possible to
integrate a python test
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 01/14/2011 06:19 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Attached are 2 patches for caching the definesflags and introducing
the options.
Thanks.
I'll look into testing next, any hints for what to look out for would
be appreciated
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 01/14/2011 01:28 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
I'm fine with making it optional. Another option would be to make it
hidden, as we want tools and not users to interact with it. Your call.
Actually, with an option
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Brad King brad.k...@www.kitware.com wrote:
On 01/12/2011 11:47 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Split up the patch - apparently I need ssh access to push the topic
stuff, so I'm just attaching the patches.
Thanks. That's pretty clean. In the final version
)
that you might want to run during a build, too.
On 1/11/2011 5:10 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
I thought about that, too. On the other hand, we might also want to
make that information available from other generators where it makes
sense - in my mind it is somewhat orthogonal to the generator
Hi,
we're working on C++ tools based on clang to get the power of
automated refactoring and analysis that Java has known for years to
C++ developers.
With the attached patch I include a proposal for how we could export
the compile command line for C/C++ files from cmake for Unix makefile
18 matches
Mail list logo
