For more details, see
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch2-java7-linux-x86/484/
No changes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1 on RC1
- Verified signatures
- Verified maven artifacts on Nexus for sources
- Checked rat reports
- Checked documentation
- Checked packaging contents
- Built from sources on RHEL 7 box
- Ran unit tests for new HDFS features with Java 8
Thanks,
--Konstantin
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 2:55 PM
PDT 10pm Wednesday = tonight, CST 1pm Thursday = today.
Feel free to join Zoom and chat.
Join Zoom Meeting
https://cloudera.zoom.us/j/880548968
Past sessions:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jXM5Ujvf-zhcyw_5kiQVx6g-HeKe-YGnFS_1-qFXomI/edit
Also heads-up,
On November 20/21, Feilong from
We're going to fix the Submarine email list issues once spin-off works
start
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 2:39 PM Matt Foley
wrote:
> Definitely yes on ‘ozone-issues’. Whether we want to keep ozone-dev and
> hdfs-dev together or separate, I’m neutral.
> Thanks,
> —Matt
>
> On Oct 23, 2019, at 2:11
Definitely yes on ‘ozone-issues’. Whether we want to keep ozone-dev and
hdfs-dev together or separate, I’m neutral.
Thanks,
—Matt
On Oct 23, 2019, at 2:11 PM, Elek, Marton wrote:
Thanks to report this problem Rohith,
Yes, it seems to be configured with the wrong mailing list.
I think the
Thanks to report this problem Rohith,
Yes, it seems to be configured with the wrong mailing list.
I think the right fix is to create ozone-dev@ and ozone-issues@ and use
them instead of hdfs-(dev/issues).
Is there any objections against creating new ozone-* mailing lists?
Thanks,
Marton
Hi Eric, thanks for trying it out. We talked about this in today's YARN
community sync up, summarizing here for everyone else:
I don't think it's worth delaying the 2.10.0 release further, we can
address this in a subsequent 2.10.x release. Wangda mentioned it might be
related to changes in
For more details, see
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/1298/
[Oct 22, 2019 1:04:02 PM] (ayushsaxena) HDFS-14918. Remove useless
getRedundancyThread from
[Oct 22, 2019 1:14:22 PM] (ayushsaxena) HDFS-14915. Move Superuser Check Before
Taking Lock For Encryption API.
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks very much for all of your work on this release.
I have a concern about cross-queue (inter-queue) preemption in 2.10.
In 2.8, on a 6 node pseudo-cluster, preempting from one queue to meet the needs
of another queue seems to work as expected. However, 2.10 in the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Loughran resolved HADOOP-16658.
-
Fix Version/s: 3.3.0
Resolution: Fixed
> S3A connector does not support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Loughran resolved HADOOP-16316.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
HADOOP-16477 is the same issue; this came first but that has a
11 matches
Mail list logo