sday, June 08, 2016 3:33 AM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why there are so many revert operations on trunk?
One anti-pattern that keeps coming up over and over again is people trying to
do big and complex features without feature branches. This happened with HDFS
truncate as w
o work in a more friendly
> > > environment. In many cases, -1 without solid reason will frustrate people
> > > who are doing contributions. I think we should restraint our -1 unless it
> > > is really necessary.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Tha
without solid reason will frustrate
>> people
>> > who are doing contributions. I think we should restraint our -1 unless
>> it
>> > is really necessary.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> >
>> > Junping
>> >
>>
> who are doing contributions. I think we should restraint our -1 unless it
> > is really necessary.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > Junping
> >
> >
> > ________
> > From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
lapalli
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 9:36 PM
> To: Andrew Wang
> Cc: Junping Du; Aaron T. Myers; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org;
> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org;
> yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why there are so many revert operations on trunk?
>
ng Du; Aaron T. Myers; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org;
hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why there are so many revert operations on trunk?
Folks,
It is truly disappointing how we are escalating situations that can be resolved
through
+1
This is a good summary, And we are better off resolving issues through
discussions on emails, rather than JIRA, and everyone behaving amicably towards
each other.
I think we should be more willing to do feature branches, especially for things
like
- anything deep into the codebase
- self
inline
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> It is truly disappointing how we are escalating situations that can be
> resolved through basic communication.
>
> Things that shouldn’t have happened
> - After a few objections were raised, commits should ha
Folks,
It is truly disappointing how we are escalating situations that can be resolved
through basic communication.
Things that shouldn’t have happened
- After a few objections were raised, commits should have simply stopped before
restarting again but only after consensus
- Reverts (or revert
This seems like something that is going to probably happen again if we
continue to cut releases from trunk.
I know that this has been discussed at length in a separate thread but I
think it would be good to recognize that it is the core of the issue here.
Either we:
* need to define what will hap
To clarify what happened here, I moved the commits to a feature branch, not
just reverting the commits. The intent was to make it easy to merge back in
later, and also to unblock the 2.8 and 3.0 releases we've been trying very
hard to wrap up for weeks. This doesn't slow down development since you
ll community. Only through
>> this, the success of Hadoop in age of 3.0 are guranteed.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Junping
>>
>>
>> ____________________
>> From: Aaron T. Myers
>> Sent: Monday, June 06,
>
> From: Aaron T. Myers
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 4:46 PM
> To: Junping Du
> Cc: Andrew Wang; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why there
u
Cc: Andrew Wang; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why there are so many revert operations on trunk?
Junping,
All of this is being discussed on HDFS-9924. Suggest you follow the
conversation
Junping,
All of this is being discussed on HDFS-9924. Suggest you follow the
conversation there.
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Junping Du wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I just noticed you revert 8 commits on trunk last Friday:
>
> HADOOP-13226
>
>
Hi Andrew,
I just noticed you revert 8 commits on trunk last Friday:
HADOOP-13226
HDFS-10430
HDFS-10431
HDFS-10390
HADOOP-13168
HDFS-10390
HADOOP-13168
HDFS-10346
HADOOP-12957
HDFS-10224
And I didn't see you have any comments on JIRA or email discussion before
you did this. I d
16 matches
Mail list logo
