On Jan 31, 2008 3:31 PM, joerg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *) So it seems you're talking about X. Don't you? (Well "terse" is relative)
> something like
X is rather low-level.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://list
David Schlesinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >If you look I specifically said VOIP over wifi.
> >OpenMoko phones WILL allow this!
>
> My unlocked Nokia E65 also allows this.
>
> As he said, it's a carrier issue, not a phone issue.
>
Fair enough I stand corrected - I will remove this one
>If you look I specifically said VOIP over wifi.
>OpenMoko phones WILL allow this!
My unlocked Nokia E65 also allows this.
As he said, it's a carrier issue, not a phone issue.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://li
>
> Quite a few of the 'problems' you have pointed out are carrier issues not
> handset issues, ie it wont matter if you have a GTA01/02 or not. eg the use
> of voip software...
>
> Andy
>
Andy
If you look I specifically said VOIP over wifi.
OpenMoko phones WILL allow this!
JW
PS I agree
Sorry, wrong mailinglist.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Hi,
I tried this: http://owfs.sourceforge.net/WRT54G.html and it doesn't
work for me.
It looks really weird how the author connected the DS2480B, which runs
at 5V directly to the UART, which provides only 3.3V. I think this would
need some level-shifting.
The datasheet also says the POL-Pin
Hi all,
I wrote a little gsmd testing framework, with the hope it can be used
to stabilize (lib)gsmd. You can find an initial release on:
http://chmeee.dyndns.org/om/testing_gsmd.html
NB: I cross-posted to three mailing lists to get exposure (everybody
should be able to write tests, though you
I would be interested :)
2008/2/3, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello,
>
> Al Johnson wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 January 2008, Lally Singh wrote:
> >> On Jan 31, 2008 5:31 PM, joerg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Am Do 31. Januar 2008 schrieb Shawn Rutledge:
> >>> [...]
> >>>
Sorry, I have updated that.
AFAIK:
Here (in Hungary) it is illegal to unlock your phone. Certainly you can
buy unlocked phone for a higher price, but unlocking already locked ones
(by "experts") is illegal. There are many people earning their money
from this illegal activity though...
Schmi
Hello,
Al Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2008, Lally Singh wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 5:31 PM, joerg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Do 31. Januar 2008 schrieb Shawn Rutledge:
[...]
My
goal is to have applications written in arbitrary languages, running
on app servers, using a terse UI met
On Sunday 03 February 2008 19:55, JW wrote:
> Hi Openmoko community
>
> I created a new page to list the problems of typical "closed" phones with
> the intention of informing potential Openmoko phone buyers.
>
> Please add your examples to the 4 I included as a starting point.
> Feedback welcome! :
Hi Openmoko community
I created a new page to list the problems of typical "closed" phones with the
intention of informing potential Openmoko phone buyers.
Please add your examples to the 4 I included as a starting point.
Feedback welcome! :-)
JW
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Problems_of_typica
On Thursday 31 January 2008, Lally Singh wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 5:31 PM, joerg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Do 31. Januar 2008 schrieb Shawn Rutledge:
> > [...]
> >
> > > My
> > > goal is to have applications written in arbitrary languages, running
> > > on app servers, using a terse UI met
ian chu wrote:
Hello~
I have two simple questions about Openmoko develop.
Is it correct to transfer our projects ( like GPS ) from PC to
Openmoko by dfu ? and how? scp?
If all you want is to download and install the file from the project
repository, the cool solution may be to type wget on Ope
Wolfgang Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It seems to me there is now a clear structure
> >
> > 1) Neo1973 has internal codename (GTA01xxx)
> > 2) Freerunner has internal codename (GTA02xxx)
>
> That is correct.
Ok, but we wait to see if Piotr is right!
I am glad I asked!
> We just hire
JW, Pietro, roh -
OK, the confusion even exist within OpenMoko :-)
So it's definitely something we need to find out soon.
I think it's like JW said, roh thinks it's like Pietro said.
Stay tuned, we will find out soon...
Wolfgang
On Feb 3, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Joachim Steiger wrote:
Pietro "m0nt0
Hello,
Thank, you Joachim! That confirms what I knew!
Joachim Steiger wrote:
Neo1973 is a class of devices, not only one specific model.
gta01 and gta02 are models.
FreeRunner a synonym for gta02 release version
Cheers,
Bogdan
___
OpenMoko commun
On 03/02/2008, JW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Openmoko community
>
> The wiki needs to present clear information.
>
> There is one area where it is pretty bad at the moment and that is in all
> the
> confusing references to neo's and GTA01s and GTA02s.
>
> It seems to me there is now a clear
Pietro "m0nt0" Montorfano wrote:
> JW ha scritto:
>> Hi Openmoko community
>>
>> The wiki needs to present clear information.
>>
>> There is one area where it is pretty bad at the moment and that is in
>> all the
>> confusing references to neo's and GTA01s and GTA02s.
>>
>> It seems to me there is
JW -
Should i just go ahead and change the core structure to being
correct and the
rest will follow?Is there someone overlooking wiki structure?
Yes, I think you can move ahead with those changes.
Let's see what others are saying...
It seems to me there is now a clear structure
1) Neo
JW ha scritto:
Hi Openmoko community
The wiki needs to present clear information.
There is one area where it is pretty bad at the moment and that is in all the
confusing references to neo's and GTA01s and GTA02s.
It seems to me there is now a clear structure
1) Neo1973 has internal codename (
21 matches
Mail list logo
