Re: Community contributions to core apps & features. (Was: Terminal for ASU)

2008-08-08 Thread Michael Shiloh
rakshat hooja wrote: > > > > It is already linked from the front page, but clearly from not those > places it should be from :) > > But you have good points. Openmoko is open, but its development is not > exposed in the open as much as I'd like for an open source project to >

Re: Community contributions to core apps & features. (Was: Terminal for ASU)

2008-07-27 Thread Lisa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for posting that link Rashat! I'm waiting for Stroller to get an answer too, but it's nice to know who to complain to about what after this :) ~ I want my KEYBOARD SWITCH back, I do! ~ Lisa -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0

Re: Community contributions to core apps & features. (Was: Terminal for ASU)

2008-07-26 Thread Michele Renda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This problem is common to all the process / firms: who must to take the important design decision? There can be two possibility: A) Who code B) Who doesn't code but can have a global vision of the project To choose between these two alternatives i

Re: Community contributions to core apps & features. (Was: Terminal for ASU)

2008-07-26 Thread Aaron Sowry
rakshat hooja wrote: > > > > It is already linked from the front page, but clearly from not those > places it should be from :) > > But you have good points. Openmoko is open, but its development is not > exposed in the open as much as I'd like for an open source project to > be

Re: Community contributions to core apps & features. (Was: Terminal for ASU)

2008-07-26 Thread rakshat hooja
> > > It is already linked from the front page, but clearly from not those > places it should be from :) > > But you have good points. Openmoko is open, but its development is not > exposed in the open as much as I'd like for an open source project to > be. The Openmoko folks are still a bit "myste

Re: Community contributions to core apps & features. (Was: Terminal for ASU)

2008-07-26 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2008/7/26 Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I won't comment further at this time, but I'll amend the wiki later > (cc'd to documentation as a reminder) so that some other relevant > pages link to it & it's easier to find. It is already linked from the front page, but clearly from not those places it

Re: Community contributions to core apps & features. (Was: Terminal for ASU)

2008-07-26 Thread Stroller
On 26 Jul 2008, at 09:46, rakshat hooja wrote: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Stroller > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> There's apparently no design document saying where ASU (or whatever) >> is going in terms of features. We don't know who to contact in order >> to get approval for our con

Re: Community contributions to core apps & features. (Was: Terminal for ASU)

2008-07-26 Thread rakshat hooja
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > There's apparently no design document saying where ASU (or whatever) > is going in terms of features. We don't know who to contact in order > to get approval for our concepts before we waste a lot of time on > them. I agre

Community contributions to core apps & features. (Was: Terminal for ASU)

2008-07-26 Thread Stroller
On 26 Jul 2008, at 03:10, steve wrote: > Ask your questions stroller. > > I'll do my best to answer them. Hi Steve, Thanks for your reply. I've posted my questions - or rather a request for openness & clarification - already in this thread. Because the background of the thread already cont