[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904558#action_12904558
]
Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-92:
---
I've thought about start.jar some more.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904561#action_12904561
]
Jettro Coenradie commented on CONNECTORS-92:
As for the start.jar I do not s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904582#action_12904582
]
Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-41:
---
I looked at this in some detail yesterday
Apache Manifold is growing on me. And/or Apache Manifold CF or Apache Manifold
Conn. Framework.
Has a nice short name, easy to pronounce, doesn't require funky acronyms and
from Webster's:
"Machinery . a chamber having several outlets through which a liquid or gas is
distributed or gathered."
I, too like it. There's a problem though:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold_System
Other similar possibilities include Multiplex, or maybe we get somewhere by
using ManifoldCF? Or maybe "Apache Manifold" is different enough from
"Manifold System" to be distinguishable?
FWIW, Multiplex is a
How about Macon... from Mac[hinery] + con[nection]. A small city, also a
dirigible airship.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Grant Ingersoll"
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:46 AM
To:
Subject: Re: About name change
Apache Manifold is growing on me.
Hah. If I'd scrolled past the German, I would have realized that the
"Multiplex" this refers to is in fact a piece of hardware, so I think we'd
be OK with this one.
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I, too like it. There's a problem though:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org
I don't find any obvious software uses of the name. I don't find it
terribly descriptive though - multiplex/manifold wins in my opinion.
Acromantula is also available and is more descriptive:
http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Acromantula
(if you don't mind the HP references. ;-) )
Karl
On Tu
Simon suggests "Apache Omni", which I also like, and which does not appear
to be common in software packages (although there is a company called the
"Omni Group", apparently).
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hah. If I'd scrolled past the German, I would have realized
Brand names are better when they are less purely descriptive or simply
indirectly descriptive.
I'm okay with Acromantula if people want it, especially since it seems to
adhere to all the Apache guidelines, but since I am unable to pronounce it,
I would be able to promote it via "word of mouth"
Gotta do it. We've got to have a vote among the connectors developers, and
before that we need all the name candidates on the slate. At 5 PM I intend
to present the feasible candidates (I will include the current Apache
Connectors Framework), and ask everyone to rank them in order of preference.
"Ackromantyoola."
I think JK got the name from somewhere else anyhow, so there's prior art
involved. ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Jack Krupansky <
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
> Brand names are better when they are less purely descriptive or simply
> indirectly desc
Gotta do it. We've got to have a vote among the connectors developers, and
before that we need all the name candidates on the slate. At 5 PM I intend
to present the feasible candidates (I will include the current Apache
Connectors Framework), and ask everyone to rank them in order of preference.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904610#action_12904610
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-41:
--
To be clear about the use case, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904611#action_12904611
]
Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-41:
---
Does it makes no sense to create an entir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904614#action_12904614
]
Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-41:
---
I also claim that even if a wholly-as-yet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904618#action_12904618
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-41:
--
The notification is certainly "asso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904622#action_12904622
]
Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-41:
---
I think we're discussing two entirely dis
On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I, too like it. There's a problem though:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold_System
>
> Other similar possibilities include Multiplex, or maybe we get somewhere by
> using ManifoldCF? Or maybe "Apache Manifold" is different enough from
On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I don't find any obvious software uses of the name. I don't find it
> terribly descriptive though - multiplex/manifold wins in my opinion.
> Acromantula is also available and is more descriptive:
>
> http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Acromantula
Maybe we should just ask Doug Cutting's kid to come up with a name ;-)
FWIW, we should also think about names that are findable. Omni is likely to be
buried in any search engine
Of course, it's easy to be the critic, much harder to come up with a good
suggestion.
On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:11 AM,
Technically, the official name would be "Apache Manifold" anyway. The
"Apache" always gets prefixed. Even Yukon may be okay since it would
actually be "Apache Yukon".
In short, we don't need to propose "Apache" as part of what we vote on since
that will automatically get added, I think.
-- J
To increase findability, how about Lucon or Lukon - Lu[cene] + con[nector]
or "k" for Karl.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Grant Ingersoll"
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:25 AM
To:
Subject: Re: About name change -- Acromantula
Maybe we should
I hope to call a vote tonight, but my posting about that never made it
through for some reason. (I posted the same thing twice, too!). Anyhow,
I'll include all of these in the list of candidates. It would be good to
find out in advance if Apache Manifold is a possibility, though. That would
be
Omnivore, perhaps? A little more findable... Of course, now the humorist
in me tries to extend this in obviously wrong directions, like "Apache
Yardsale" and "Apache VacuumCleaner". ;-)
Tying to Lucene seems like not quite the right idea, in my view, but we can
vote on it.
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wright reassigned CONNECTORS-41:
-
Assignee: Karl Wright
> Add hooks to output connectors for receiving event notificatio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wright resolved CONNECTORS-41.
---
Fix Version/s: LCF Release 0.5
Resolution: Fixed
Fix checked in, r991295.
> Add h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904736#action_12904736
]
Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-57:
---
I added unconditional commit support to t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904746#action_12904746
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-57:
--
This looks fine so far and should w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-62?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904768#action_12904768
]
Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-62:
--
Just wanted to update the link to t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wright resolved CONNECTORS-57.
---
Fix Version/s: LCF Release 0.5
Resolution: Fixed
Checked in a new tab. r991374.
I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list with
a selection, in order, of the top three names for the project currently
known as Apache Connectors Framework. The choices
are:
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Acromantula
Apache Manifold
Apache ManifoldCF
Apache Multi
Huh. My vote post didn't make it either. The connectors-dev list must be
holding my posts for moderation or something. So I'll post it in-thread as
well, and hope that somebody fixes my email soon.
I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list with
a selection, in orde
1. Apache Yukon
2. Apache Macon
3. Apache Lukon
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Karl Wright"
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:44 PM
To: "connectors-dev"
Subject: [VOTE] Pick your preferred name
I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to th
My preferences:
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Manifold
Apache Acromantula
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list
> with a selection, in order, of the top three names for the project currently
> kno
Apache Manifold
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Yukon
- mark
On 8/31/10 6:54 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> My preferences:
>
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Manifold
> Apache Acromantula
>
> Karl
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> I know this is un-Apache-like,
Don't know if this is an open vote... but if it is:
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Yukon
Apache Manifold
--
Thanks,
Matt Weber
3:58 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Apache Manifold
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Yukon
>
> - mark
>
> On 8/31/10 6:54 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> My preference
On 8/31/10 7:09 PM, Matt Weber wrote:
> Don't know if this is an open vote... but if it is:
>
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Yukon
> Apache Manifold
>
>
The more input the merrier!
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Connectors Framework
(sorry)
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list
> with
> a selection, in order, of the top three names for the project curren
Well, you've made your feelings clear. ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Connectors Framework
>
> (sorry)
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> > I know this is un-Apache-like,
you can ignore my vote really :)
but i was thinking from a practical perspective, this one involves the least
code changes.
plus, with existing projects named things like "apache DB" and "apache http
server", i don't understand the fuss.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> We
I think its pretty clear that unless the lords of the incubator *force*
us to do otherwise, we should just leave it as Apache Connectors
Framework. The vote is going to end up reflecting that is my bet anyway.
I havn't seen anyone that's actually involved (if you can say anyone
beyond karl is reall
I think this vote will conclusively demonstrate the community position to
the solons at incubator. They can choose to ignore the vote, of course, but
they won't be able to say we didn't consider alternatives. ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I think its pretty cle
43 matches
Mail list logo
