Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

On 11/7/10 9:18 AM, tee wrote: And if there is any disagreement and fell short on your part, based on your answer, is that you seemed to denied my solution is not a solution at all. There is nothing wrong at all with your solution. It just dose not work out for me with this particular s

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

On Nov 7, 2010, at 4:37 AM, David Laakso wrote: > On 11/6/10 1:28 PM, tee wrote: >> >>> Now, if I can just figure out why Mac OS X 10.4 Safari/4.1.2 and the >>> current WebKit nightly are both rendering some images as teeny-tiny >>> thumbnails with js enabled... >>> >>> Anyone? >> Pretty sur

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

On 11/6/10 1:28 PM, tee wrote: Now, if I can just figure out why Mac OS X 10.4 Safari/4.1.2 and the current WebKit nightly are both rendering some images as teeny-tiny thumbnails with js enabled... Anyone? Pretty sure it's caused by max-width declaration in #main img. Not a good idea for

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

Now, if I can just figure out why Mac OS X 10.4 Safari/4.1.2 and the current WebKit nightly are both rendering some images as teeny-tiny thumbnails with js enabled... Anyone? Best, ~d uri: Resolved. Deleted float : left; from the declaration #main im

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

> > Now, if I can just figure out why Mac OS X 10.4 Safari/4.1.2 and the current > WebKit nightly are both rendering some images as teeny-tiny thumbnails with > js enabled... > > Anyone? Pretty sure it's caused by max-width declaration in #main img. Not a good idea for inline image. I ass

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

On 11/6/10 11:54 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: David Laakso wrote: uri: css: In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

At 10:00 AM -0400 11/6/10, David Laakso wrote: uri: css: In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red rule. What t

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

> David Laakso wrote: > > uri: > > css: > > > > In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- > digits 2 > > through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red > rule. > > What to d

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

On 11/6/10 11:38 AM, Susanne Jäger wrote: David Laakso wrote: uri: css: In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red

Re: [css-d] [+] css with js disabled

Hi David, > uri: > css: > > In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits > 2 > through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red > rule. > What to do? What about using a

Re: [css-d] css with js disabled

David Laakso wrote: uri: css: In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red rule. What to do? if I understood you co

[css-d] css with js disabled

uri: css: In this rough layout -- when viewed with javascript disabled -- digits 2 through 8 ought to be stacked vertically and flush left to the red rule. What to do? Best, ~d -- :: desktop and mobile :: http