-Caveat Lector-
Robert wrote:
> As I recall from running the numbers the Chama NM/CO tunnel is 12.6 miles
>long
>and 10.92 feet in diameter. Where it is listed as a BuRec project, I would
>imagine
>it has something to do with water...although you never know.
It's listed as being near the San
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/8/99 9:11:01 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hiya Robert,
>
> Can't say that I'm a Hoagland fan. I believe that there are tunnels for
> very innocent reasons. But why would we need 5 and 10 mile long tunnels in
> the middle of
-Caveat Lector-
Robert wrote:
> Back in November Hoagland used the web link (except it was to Arizona) as
>suggested proof that underground activity was happening near turret
>peak...which allegedly confirmed what his "informants" were telling him.
You
>may remember
>the furor over the Dec 7t
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/8/99 4:42:17 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hey all,
>
> Pat sent this URL to underground tunnels. It has where and a description
of
> them. It's really interesting!!!
> http://www.usbr.gov/wcg/tunnels/tdata.html#Colorado
>
> Hil
Hey all,
Pat sent this URL to underground tunnels. It has
where and a description of them. It's really interesting!!!
http://www.usbr.gov/wcg/tunnels/tdata.html#Colorado
Hilary
