Hi,
I am looking for gcc2 2.95.3-10 for cygwin environment, running on Win2k.
Where can I download it from ?
Do you happen to know ?
I can not find it anywhere...
Thanks,
Oz
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Hello,
I'd like to be able to run apache + php via cygwin. However, a setup
package search for `mod-php4' and the like led to zero results. A
search on `php' returned results but nothing useful.
It seems that mod-php4 is missing.
The following google query didn't help too much:
http://www.goo
Hi,
I have asked more question about share memory and semahpore , now I have further
difficult quesions
1) is there a way to compile VC++ generated libraray in cygwin gcc?
2) all posix IPC functions require cygserver?
3) how to run cygwin gcc compiled apache2 (containing IPC functions) in
Actually, the cygipc package has been superceded by the integrated and
more capable cygserver that comes with the Cygwin package. You should
investigate cygserver if you want to know how these things work in Cygwin.
cygserver is also run as a service though, which you state is a problem
for you
Hi,
I read the cygipc source code and get to know a service must run for the IPC
functions.
That is not good for my program.
I'd like to ask how the cygwin1.dll realize the IPC functions, use cygipc package also?
another question is where I can find the IPC package using System V style funct
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Robert Pendell wrote:
> Right. Windows actually stole certain things from UNIX. Example: The
> system32\drivers\etc folder is taken directly from UNIX. There are
> certain others stolen from UNIX too but I can't remember what.
``Stolen'' is a big word. Microsoft has as muc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following packages have been added to the Cygwin distribution:
*** esound-0.2.34-1
*** libesound-devel-0.2.34-1
*** libesound0-0.2.34-1
EsounD mixes multiple digitized audio streams and samples together for
playback by a single audio device. It a
Robert Pendell wrote:
Yes. That is true. Microsoft is showing some changes though for the
future. For example. Even in Windows XP, LAN connections are
firewalled by default. SP2 will enable the firewall by default and
include a security center. The firewall is more robust giving the user
a bit
Hi,
This guy sounds like a nut case... Obviously flame bait... I don't know
where this guy gets his information, maybe from MS press literature.
First he claims not to use Outlook, then claims he uses it behind a
firewall... What difference does it make that he runs Outlook behind a
firewall? He i
See below for my replies to certain comments
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:38:20 -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>
> Robert McNulty Junior wrote:
>
> > It's not Ourlook or Ourlook Express. I use outlook xp with a firewall
> > and an antivirus.
>
> Ah duh! That's still Outlook!
>
> > Its coming from someone
Robert McNulty Junior wrote:
It's not Ourlook or Ourlook Express. I use outlook xp with a firewall
and an antivirus.
Ah duh! That's still Outlook!
Its coming from someone on [EMAIL PROTECTED] And [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what?!? You do realize that email addresses can easily be forged
don't you?
I'
Ok. Let's stop talking about this now.
It was a temporary glitch. Hoping that would be obvious given the
amount of spam/viruses that actually makes it through here is probably
way too much to ask.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://c
It's not Ourlook or Ourlook Express.
I use outlook xp with a firewall and an antivirus.
Its coming from someone on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not affected by this virus. I just scanned my computer, and netsky worm
is not there, nor is any other virus.
Linux is being hit hard with v
Chris Taylor wrote:
On Wed, June 30, 2004 7:47 pm, Andrew DeFaria said:
phil wrote:
can whoever maintains this list ensure that virus definitions are up
to date.
I have had 3 and as I write 5 instances of the above.
be on guard
How about switching to something other than the virus propagating MS
On Wed, June 30, 2004 7:47 pm, Andrew DeFaria said:
> phil wrote:
>
>> can whoever maintains this list ensure that virus definitions are up to
>> date.
>>
>> I have had 3 and as I write 5 instances of the above.
>>
>>
>> be on guard
>
> How about switching to something other than the virus pr
phil wrote:
can whoever maintains this list ensure that virus definitions are up
to date.
I have had 3 and as I write 5 instances of the above.
be on guard
How about switching to something other than the virus propagating MS
software (i.e. Outlook and Outlook Express)?
--
There cannot be a crisi
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, phil wrote:
> can whoever maintains this list ensure that virus definitions are up to
> date.
>
> I have had 3 and as I write 5 instances of the above.
>
> be on guard
> Regards
> Phil
Phil,
There are spam/virus filters, and there are messages with spoofed e-mail
addresses t
can whoever maintains this list ensure that virus definitions are up to
date.
I have had 3 and as I write 5 instances of the above.
be on guard
Regards
Phil
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentatio
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Ford
> Sent: 30 June 2004 18:31
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > The virtual memory available to a process is 2GB under NT.
> I see two
> > possible workarounds:
> >
> > - There's a way to start NT with a "
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dan Hatton
> Sent: 30 June 2004 16:34
> I've now added " /3GB" to the end of the last line of my
> boot.ini, making
> the complete file:
>
> [boot loader]
> timeout=30
> default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINDOWS
> [operatin
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > The virtual memory available to a process is 2GB under NT. I see two
> > possible workarounds:
> >
> > - There's a way to start NT with a "/3gb" switch from boot.ini which
> > allows to get 3GB of virtua
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> The virtual memory available to a process is 2GB under NT. I see two
> possible workarounds:
>
> - There's a way to start NT with a "/3gb" switch from boot.ini which
> allows to get 3GB of virtual memory per process. Dunno if that's
> available
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Dan Hatton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Tim Prince wrote:
>
> > cygwin doesn't emulate a 64-bit OS. Did you try setting up XP with /3GB to
> > see whether that would give another 1 GB, or check the archives for any
> > reports on such an attempt?
>
> I've now added " /3GB" t
I am having a problem with timer notifications using SIGEV_THREAD. I adapted
the sigev_thread.c program from
http://homepage.mac.com/dbutenhof/Threads/source.html to illustrate problem.
basically my application has a main loop which reads commands from the keyboard
and meantime in the backgroun
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Tim Prince wrote:
> cygwin doesn't emulate a 64-bit OS. Did you try setting up XP with /3GB to
> see whether that would give another 1 GB, or check the archives for any
> reports on such an attempt?
I've now added " /3GB" to the end of the last line of my boot.ini, making
th
At 06:39 AM 6/30/2004, you wrote:
>OKay, so what soltuion do I have ?
>I have downloaded Cygwi, especially the GDB 20030919-1 package (guess it's
>what you call vanilla Windows GDB ?). I have tried to compile it for
>architecture ia64-pc-cygwin, but it failed. Same for ia64-pc-elf.
>I'de like to ad
On Jun 30 14:54, Dan Hatton wrote:
>
> I'm using CYGWIN_NT-5.1, under XP Pro.
>
> I've set my heap_chunk_in_mb registry key to a very large value (10240
> decimal,) because I'm doing some RAM-hungry numerical calculations.
>
> I have enough space to do this (Control Panel->System reports 12 GB o
At 06:54 AM 6/30/2004, Dan Hatton wrote:
I'm using CYGWIN_NT-5.1, under XP Pro.
I've set my heap_chunk_in_mb registry key to a very large value (10240
decimal,) because I'm doing some RAM-hungry numerical calculations.
I have enough space to do this (Control Panel->System reports 12 GB of
virtual
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dan Hatton
> Sent: 30 June 2004 14:55
> I'm using CYGWIN_NT-5.1, under XP Pro.
>
> I've set my heap_chunk_in_mb registry key to a very large value (10240
> decimal,) because I'm doing some RAM-hungry numerical calculations.
>
> I hav
I'm using CYGWIN_NT-5.1, under XP Pro.
I've set my heap_chunk_in_mb registry key to a very large value (10240
decimal,) because I'm doing some RAM-hungry numerical calculations.
I have enough space to do this (Control Panel->System reports 12 GB of
virtual memory allocated.)
However, the max_me
I have tried your link, but it's a dead link. I saw your post telling that
MSDN CDs provide teh CV5.0 spec. I can find them neither on the last MSDN
library CDrom. Any idea of where I could find the spec ?
Vincent Girard-Reydet
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
> Hi,
>>
>> I have recognized that files named "aux", "lpt1", "nul", "prn" ... (old
DOS
>> devices) generated under Cygwin on a XP OS cannot be deleted anymore:
>>
>> rm: cannot unlink `prn': Permission denied
>>
>> Why? How to get rid of them?
>
>It's a bug in 1.5.10 that these files can be cre
On Wed, June 30, 2004 5:27 am, Marcel Telka said:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 11:04:05AM +0800, jackylamaddress-deleted
> wrote:
www.cygwin.com/acronyms#PCYMTNQREAIYR
>
>> Before running my program, I install the ioperm service by:
>> ioperm.exe -i
>
> You should install the service as administr
On Jun 30 11:46, Guettich, Ulrich, OPM2 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have recognized that files named "aux", "lpt1", "nul", "prn" ... (old DOS
> devices) generated under Cygwin on a XP OS cannot be deleted anymore:
>
> rm: cannot unlink `prn': Permission denied
>
> Why? How to get rid of them?
It's a bug
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Sean McCune
> Sent: 30 June 2004 04:51
> Howdy all,
>
> In building the latest source (checked out tonight), I'm getting the
> following error, stating that bfd_get_section_size() is
> undeclared. Was
> something not checked in to C
OKay, so what soltuion do I have ?
I have downloaded Cygwi, especially the GDB 20030919-1 package (guess it's
what you call vanilla Windows GDB ?). I have tried to compile it for
architecture ia64-pc-cygwin, but it failed. Same for ia64-pc-elf.
I'de like to add PDB support to the BFD library, but I
Hi,
I have recognized that files named "aux", "lpt1", "nul", "prn" ... (old DOS
devices) generated under Cygwin on a XP OS cannot be deleted anymore:
rm: cannot unlink `prn': Permission denied
Why? How to get rid of them?
Best regards
Ulrich
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#uns
On Jun 29 23:51, Sean McCune wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> In building the latest source (checked out tonight), I'm getting the
> following error, stating that bfd_get_section_size() is undeclared. Was
> something not checked in to CVS fully?
>
>
> ../../../../src/winsup/utils/parse_pe.cc: In functio
38 matches
Mail list logo
