.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi, is there any progress on packaging igmpproxy daemon?
When will be package in debian apt repository?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
In ubuntu is package updated for 3 years. Can you update this
package also in Debian? (e.g forward ubuntu patch?)
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Right, it does not make sense to have in debian repository free
applications with enabled xvmc support and disabled (not included)
free xvmc drivers in repository.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
onsole 115200)" {
EOF
printf '%s\n' "${prepare_boot_cache}"
cat << EOF
$LX $MEMTESTPATH console=ttyS0,115200n8
}
fi
EOF
===
and both memtest86+ menu entries will be visible only if grub is
running in bios mode. In uefi mode grub_platform is set to &q
This bug is fixed in upstream version 0.9.6 of network-manager.
In Debian Jessie is version 0.9.8, so this bug is already fixed.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hello!
It looks like nouveau, r600 and radeonsi vdpau drivers are already in
debian repository. But not xvmc libraries. See:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/mesa-vdpau-drivers
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705558#24
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
2014-03-23 21:19 GMT+01:00 Julien Cristau :
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 19:03:52 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> It looks like nouveau, r600 and radeonsi vdpau drivers are already in
>> debian repository. But not xvmc libraries. See:
>>
> Correct,
Hello Raphael,
are these wlm patches on debian bug #657191 still valid? Btw in
future, please send kopete patches to kopete-devel mailinglist or
to kde reviewboard.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Friday 31 May 2013 16:56:23 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 31 May 2013 14:58, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello Raphael,
> >
> > are these wlm patches on debian bug #657191 still valid? Btw
> > in future, please send kopete patches to kopete-devel
>
no with default which calling ifup/ifdown).
Patch is attached, generated by hg diff against repository on:
http://hg.serpentine.com/netplug
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
diff -r aaebd52fac19 lib.c
--- a/lib.c Sat Jun 26 09:36:45 2010 -0700
+++ b/lib.c Sat Mar 02 02:38:19 2013 +0100
Patches from Debian bug #657191 was commited to Kopete master git
repository and they will part of KDE 4.11 release. So this bug
can be closed as fixed in upstream.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Št 21. júl 2011, 16:22:48 CEST, Timo Juhani Lindfors
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I you might want to keep the bug in the Cc list if you talk about it so
> that others see what has been done..
Ok, I forgot append CC list.
>
> Pali Rohár writes:
> > I can maintain my appli
On Sunday 30 October 2016 18:31:39 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "igmpproxy"
>
> * Package name: igmpproxy
>Version : 0.1-1
>Upstre
://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=118977
Patch which fixes zerofill attribute will be part of DBD::mysql 4.042
release and is there: https://github.com/perl5-dbi/DBD-mysql/pull/75
It contains also automated test for verification that zerofill is
working correctly.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro
-2017-8305 for this issue.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
am release.
- CVE-2017-8305: Fix buffer overflow in strlcpy implementation
(Closes: #861347)
* Enable hardening.
* Install new man pages.
* Update debian/watch.
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Per Gregor's request CCing perl team.
On Sunday 26 February 2017 23:30:03 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Package: libdbd-mysql-perl
> Version: 4.041-1
>
> DBD::mysql in version 4.040 introduced regression for zerofill
> columns and since that version values are returned as without
even when they are not used and needed?
>
>
> you have to list *every* copyright and license on copyright file, regardless
> of it being used or not.
> This is a showstopper for ftpmasters.
Done, now all embedded libraries have entry in copyright file.
Package is now updated on men
am release
* Remove upstream patch Makefile.patch
* Fix formatting of package description
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
rejected by ftpmasters!
>
> So, this point is really a showstopper for the inclusion in Debian of the tool
> (BTW if you want to ask ftpmasters about their opinion let me know their
> answer).
>
> I would like to avoid uploading and get a reject, but I would consider an
> uploa
G.
>
Hi Gianfranco, I did not updated package because I did not know that
some step is needed to do. My last uploaded version worked and I thought
that it was OK.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
not need to patch software just for compilation
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
and upgrading if original
source code which patch modify changes.
And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to
reduce patches if they are not really needed?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place.
> > I know where and how. But I do not like idea
On Friday 27 May 2016 13:10:26 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> I'll have a look.
Now it is in sid: https://packages.debian.org/sid/udfclient
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 28 April 2016 10:13:51 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2016-03-15 21:26, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) package
> > > in Debian repository, because it is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: stormlib
Version : 9.20
Upstream Author : Ladislav Zezula
* URL : http://www.zezula.net/en/mpq/stormlib.html
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Library for accessing the MPQ archives
The
nges since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #819380)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
net/en/mpq/namebreak.html.
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #819380)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smpq"
* Package name: smpq
Version : 1.5-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://launchpad.net/smpq
* License : GPLv3
Hi!
Packages are now ready at mentors.debian.net:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/smpq
https://mentors.debian.net/package/stormlib
https://mentors.debian.net/package/stormlib-listfiles
Can somebody review them?
Note that stormlib upstream changed license to MIT.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro
ists.debian.org mailing list.
>
> Thank you for your interest in Debian,
> --
> Lucas, for the QA team
>
>
Hi Lucas! If there is no progress on packaging igmpproxy to Debian
archive, I can look at it...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 23:08:26 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-03-15 22:50, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:47:23 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2016-03-15 22:25, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
PING!
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:51:59 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi! Now after month, any news regarding this package?
>
> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 12:53:06 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Hi Pali and mentors,
> >
> > (redirecting the question to -mentors, because I don&
I updated udftools package, new version is on mentors.debian.net. Let me
know if it is OK now.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Ok, I added description about generation of files in README.source file.
New package is uploaded on mentors.debian.net
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
listfiles from Depends: to Recommends: as smpq can work without
listfiles package, just is unable to unpack old archives. Also I added
pgp check to watch...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 29 June 2016 21:17:38 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi! Is somebody already migrating package aspell-sk to new debhleper?
> If not, I can look at it.
No answer for 4 days, so I uploaded nmu update to mentors.debian.net.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: T
ragraph then??
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
opyright
file. That is all what I know and cannot do more. If there are or there
are not law problems it is probably question for other people...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-03-15 21:26, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) package in
> > Debian repository, because it is stable and is working, not like new
> > libusb-1.0-0-dev which
sing
* Handle ST_DOWNANDOUT state (Closes: #652418)
* Allow to specify custom script file via new param '-s' (Closes: #702495)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hello,
I added dirhash.h and vfs_dirhash.c files to debian/copyright as those
were missing. Other BSD files reported by licensecheck are not correctly
detected (they are not BSD licensed).
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package netplug
New version of netplug package (1.2.9.2-2) which is on
http://mentors.debian.org/package/netplug fix more bugs reported to Debian.
Ner version is not from up
\000' , driver =
'\000' }
(gdb) print *i->next->next->next->next->next
$7 = {list = {next = 0x61c470, prev = 0x61bfd0}, next = 0x61bfd0, parent = 0x0,
configuration = 0, ifnum = 1, bAlternateSetting = 0, bInterfaceClass = 11,
bInterfaceNumber = 1, bInterfaceProtocol =
report of disc
cd_sessions - Show sessions on disc
mmc_format - Format optical disc
newfs_udf - Create UDF filesystem on file or a formatted disc
udfclient - FTP-like client for UDF filesystem
udfdump - Dump information from UDF filesystem
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
se (Closes: #791421)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 17 December 2015 15:51:51 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > >> > you just dropping the patch into th
removing working libusb 0.1 implementation from
Debian until we have other working replacement library. Thanks!
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
now that there is at least one application which
does not work with new libusb 1.0.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:47:23 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-03-15 22:25, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1)
> > > > package in Debian reposi
On Friday 04 March 2016 22:40:35 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 4 March 2016 at 22:29, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> I just wanted to note that with the latest bmake (20150606-1), it
> >> is enough to have this in your debian/rules:
> >>
> >> #!/usr/bin/make -f
>
On Friday 04 March 2016 22:48:59 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 04/03/16 22:47, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 04 March 2016 22:40:35 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> >> > On 4 March 2016 at 22:29, Pali Rohár
> >> > wrote:
> >>>> > >> I just wanted t
On Friday 04 March 2016 22:59:10 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 4 March 2016 at 22:57, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> >> > Well, I did test it and it worked, otherwise I wouldn't have
> >> >> > proposed it.
> >> >
> >> > See attachment in
On Sunday 06 March 2016 08:59:53 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 6 March 2016 at 01:20, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > First dpkg-buildpackage call works, but calling it secondary fails
> > with:
> >
> > dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
&g
On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:24:05 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 6 March 2016 at 09:50, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> > It is because "debian/rules clean" calls only "bmake clean"
> >> > which does not delete autogenerated file Makefile. That is
&
On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:28:31 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:24:05 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > On 6 March 2016 at 09:50, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >> > It is because "debian/rules clean" calls only "bmake clean"
> > >> >
On Sunday 06 March 2016 10:24:05 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 6 March 2016 at 09:50, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> > It is because "debian/rules clean" calls only "bmake clean"
> >> > which does not delete autogenerated file Makefile. That is
&
On Monday 07 March 2016 14:31:44 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 6 March 2016 at 21:16, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> > But should not be cleandir part of that --buildsystem=bmake? Or
> >> > why not?
> >>
> >> You're actually very right in this, I'm
On Monday 07 March 2016 17:49:00 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 07 March 2016 14:31:44 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > On 6 March 2016 at 21:16, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >> > But should not be cleandir part of that --buildsystem=bmake? Or
> > >> > why not?
> >
On Thursday 17 December 2015 15:51:51 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > >> > you just dropping the patch into th
st*
upgrade to new version 0.6.1. It is really bugfix version and it
does not make sense to do any cherry-picking. You should apply
all patches from 0.6 to 0.6.1, so if you generate & apply cherry-
picked patches on top of 0.6 you will have same tarball as 0.6.1.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gm
Hi Arthur,
your patch fix-function-declaration.patch is broken and will not
work. That functions must be declarated in functions because they
access local function variables. So you cannot move them out.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
t.d:
- Turn off ethernet interface autoprobing
* Handle ST_DOWNANDOUT state (Closes: #652418)
* Allow to specify custom script file via new param '-s' (Closes: #702495)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
freeze.
When I patched init script to call cryptsetup with -v --debug args I see
there these last lines:
# Udev cookie 0x (semid ) decremented to 1
# Udev cookie 0x (semid ) waiting for zero
So it looks like problem is in cryptsetup and bug is still there!
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro
On Sunday 28 May 2017 21:26:53 Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 18:23:00 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Same problem there. I have up-to-date Debian Stretch with
> > LUKS-encrypted rootfs and system hangup on every shutdown or
> > reboot.
>
is a regression
when upgrading from Jessie to Stretch.
Please fix this problem in Stretch.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
On Monday 29 May 2017 09:31:39 Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Sun, 28 May 2017 at 23:41:56 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 May 2017 21:26:53 Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> >> which as I explained in message #86 is due to /etc/init.d/sendsigs
> >> killing systemd-ud
sks
/etc/rc0.d/K09cryptdisks-early
/etc/rc0.d/K10udev
So that fix is called *after* crytptdisks which is too late.
cryptdisks-early has:
# Should-Start: udev mdadm-raid
# Should-Stop: udev mdadm-raid
And cryptdisks has:
# Should-Start: udev mdadm-raid lvm2
# Should-Stop: udev mdadm-raid lvm2
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
On Monday 05 June 2017 12:55:20 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 05.06.2017 um 09:59 schrieb Pali Rohár:
> > On Monday 05 June 2017 00:49:47 Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Am 03.06.2017 um 19:44 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> >>> Am 03.06.2017 um 17:24 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
&g
On Monday 05 June 2017 20:23:52 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 05.06.2017 um 13:12 schrieb Pali Rohár:
> >> Am 05.06.2017 um 09:59 schrieb Pali Rohár:
> >>> /etc/rc0.d/K08cryptdisks
> >>> /etc/rc0.d/K09cryptdisks-early
> >>> /etc/rc0.d/K10udev
> >
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 11:56:45 Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 05 June 2017 20:23:52 Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Am 05.06.2017 um 13:12 schrieb Pali Rohár:
> >> >> Am 05.06.2017 um 09:59 schrieb Pali Rohár:
On Wednesday 07 June 2017 09:58:55 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 11:56:45 Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Pali Rohár
> > wrote:
> > > On Monday 05 June 2017 20:23:52 Michael Biebl wrote:
> > >> Am 05.06.2017 um 13
On Saturday 10 June 2017 22:44:31 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 10.06.2017 um 21:14 schrieb Pali Rohár:
>
> > PING. Do you need to test something more? Or is that patch enough?
>
> The patch seems to contain some left-over comments. Afaics it also
> misses th
:XS/g' on sources of
3rd applications/modules should be enough.
And if not, I can help with porting existing perl applications in Debian
which uses Email::Address, to be compatible with Email::Address::XS.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
On Thursday 13 July 2017 15:08:38 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> This IMHO is no reason to mark it as severity grave.
Debian Security Team suggested to add severity grave, so I did it.
On Thursday 13 July 2017 16:47:34 gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:21:06 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 13 July 2017 15:08:38 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > This IMHO is no reason to mark it as severity grave.
> > Debian Security Team sugg
s for display name or for company), plus we do not know if there are
no other inputs which can cause that problem even with applied
workaround.
Workaround was mean to be just mitigation for temporary period...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
BUMP again. This is really annoying bug which disallow installing Debian
on pre-formatted disks/partitions. Any progress? Was Colin Watson
proposed patch accepted? Or what is current state of it?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Tuesday 27 December 2016 11:58:53 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 26 December 2016 18:58:04 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Pali Rohár (2016-12-26):
> > > Package: debian-installer
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > Dear Maint
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"
* Package name: udftools
Version : 1.2-2
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools
* License : GPL-2+
debhelper 9
* Use hardening=+all
* Fix spelling in changelog
* Build only on linux-any
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
nges since the last upload:
* New upstream release 9.21
* Remove static linked library from libstorm-dev
* Compile without pie hardening (shared library is already pic)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: libtomcrypt
Version: 1.17-3.2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
priority of the package libtomcrypt is set to extra. According to policy
[1], extra priority is for packages which conflicts with others. But
package libtomcrypt0 does not conflict with other packages, see [2].
So can you c
priority: extra. Is there any specific rationale for making it
> priority: optional, though?
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > Package: libtomcrypt
> > Version: 1.17-3.2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smpq"
* Package name: smpq
Version : 1.6-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://launchpad.net/smpq
* License : GPL-3+
am release.
* Update Standards-Version.
* Change priority to optional.
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package is fixed and reupload on mentors... I hope now correctly.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Package udftools does not conflicts with others, so optional priority
level fits better then extra.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"
* Package name: udftools
Version : 1.3-1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools
* License
am release.
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ebian/ruls (upstream fixed *FLAGS support)
* Update debian/watch (upstream does not provide PGP signed tarballs)
Regards,
Pali Rohár
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: devscripts
Hi! I'm sending two patches for bts to bugs as Mattia Rizzolo wanted.
Originally I sent those patches to devscripts-devel mailing list.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
From 3178362c639d35c95682b822618d7d1361b9c8e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pali=20R
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
when DHCP server is configured to send bootfile option with iPXE script
then debian-installer fails with following "red" error:
[!!] Download debconf preconfiguration file
Failed to process the preconfiguration file
The installe
On Sunday 18 December 2016 21:32:32 Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 08:33:47PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > when DHCP server is configured to send bootfile option with iPXE
> > script
>
> > then debian-installer fails with following "red" erro
urns different response). And for example qemu does
not support it.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
4:4.14.2-5
> ii libkdnssd4 4:4.14.2-5
> ii libkemoticons4 4:4.14.2-5
> ii libkhtml5 4:4.14.2-5
> ii libkio5 4:4.14.2-5
Hi! This problem is fixed in Kopete 16.12.
Debian KDE team now needs to update Kopete package...
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 19 December 2016 00:19:02 Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:56:30PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:28:03PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > I know that they are two DHCP requests. Problem is that Debian
> > > installe
On Monday 19 December 2016 00:48:12 Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:05:45AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 December 2016 23:56:30 Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > The DHCP bootfilename in the second request, the d-i request,
> > > sh
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
