Le Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 06:10:36PM +0200, Petr Cech écrivait:
> This is cool. Could it be added to db.d.o right now?
It could, but not right now since I've not yet started to
work on this... I'll have some technical details to resolve.
I need access to the BTS, the LDAP database and probably the
I've built a package of bidwatcher, which is a tool for users of eBay, that
assists in placing and monitoring bids. I don't really want to maintain the
package, though, so I'm calling for a volunteer to package this for real and
upload it. I'm happy to provide what I've done so far, but it's just
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 11:03:11PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> > Do you want to sign each package entry, or the whole file?
>
> The whole file --- verifying each entry would take at least three minutes
> on my hardware, and god knows how long on anything moderately o
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > DUL and ORBS both seem to think they need to punish anyone whose config
> > or origin does not meet their standards (or as someone else noted in the
> > case of ORBS, if they are unable to te
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 01:11:17AM +0200, Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote:
> I have no idea, but what does it do when you press your E key while in the
> middle of a command (while editing).
>
I am afraid it has the same symptoms. :-(
PS: Please carbon copy messages to me.
[]'s
--
Rodrigo Ca
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:02:20PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 09:00:34AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > The whole file --- verifying each entry would take at least three minutes
> > on my hardware, and god knows how long on anything moderately old or
> > outdated. I c
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> > I don't see how you can create a false positive on a relay test. Either
> > the message gets through, and you're an open relay, or it doesn't, and
> > you're fine. It's quite simple, really
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> I don't see how you can create a false positive on a relay test. Either
> the message gets through, and you're an open relay, or it doesn't, and
> you're fine. It's quite simple, really.
Actually, I ran the relay test at abuse.net on tw
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:07:15PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> | - I booted with init option (linux init=/bin/bash) in order to run no
> | init script and it didn't work either. I also tried D option (linux
> | D).
>
> Assuming that your mail is serious requires a fair amount of work, b
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 08:13:25AM -0800, David Benson wrote:
> I only have one debugging idea, but your problem sounds
> like no fun, so I hope this helps...
>
> Try running ``strace bash'' to see whether the key-event
> is making it to bash.
>
> If so, try other libreadline-based progra
Steve Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is misleading. What ORBS does is *test* mail servers to ensure that
> it *is* an open relay, before adding the relay's address to the list.
>
> They do NOT (according to the web page) "scan the net" for open relays.
> Rather, the list is generat
| - I booted with init option (linux init=/bin/bash) in order to run no
| init script and it didn't work either. I also tried D option (linux
| D).
Assuming that your mail is serious requires a fair amount of work, but
I'll try anyway.
bash man page reports that /etc/profile is read first. What d
Nils Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Four weeks? Did they change this? When we got blacklisted coz a customer
> (open relay) used us as a smart host, they gave us four days ;-).
All I can report is my experience. I got four weeks.
> Yeah, me too. They're competent, cool people, and their sy
To be removed from this mailing list immediately press reply and enter REMOVE
on the subject line.
Would you like some information on saving 30% on your Phone bills each month
and how to get up to 8% back each month on your Utilities including phone. This
service works for both business and re
On 00-03-26 Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:15:20AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > as jsut discussed on debian-devel, I would like to package John the
> > > Ripper. If someone already has done or is working on it, please mail me,
> > > then I will stop packing it. Otherwise I wi
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 02:53:30PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Yes, because Santiago Vila doesn't want it and because it looks like
> a crude hack.
There is no correlation there. Or if there is, it is a negative one.
--
G. Branden Robinson| If a man ate a pound of pasta and
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:07:11PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> > So why don't you just change your local settings to make xterm be mono?
> > Ummm. `XTerm*ColorMode: no' seems like it'd do what you want.
>
> That seems to work just fine. I wish I was aware of that resource a bit
> earlier...
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 12:54:39AM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> > Oh crap, you're right. I wasn't thinking on that one. Oh well, I guess
> > somebody will have to find good colour combinations for every colour
> > package.
>
> I can do that. Black on white. Proven to work
> perfectly for
Hello,
Is there any debian package (or in fact Unix tool at all) that allows
uncompression of Mac .sit (stuffit) archives?
Nils
--
"Kif, if there's one thing I don't need it's your 'I don't think that's
wise' attitude."
--- Zap Brannigan
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 06:05:43PM +0400, Konstantin Kivi wrote:
> I also had to add
> Set_LCDClk 40
> to the Device section. Be aware that parse-xf86config
> used in /etc/init.d/xdm doesn't unserstand it
Be aware that because of problems like this, parse-xf86config has been
eliminated from
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:15:20AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > as jsut discussed on debian-devel, I would like to package John the
> > Ripper. If someone already has done or is working on it, please mail me,
> > then I will stop packing it. Otherwise I will try to upload this package
> > till
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> * Jason Gunthorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000326 08:45]:
> >[...]
> >ORBS - 314
> > Comparing connections it is found that 3970 out of 40236 connection
> > attempts would have been blocked. This can be roughly considered to be
> > 3970 emails bl
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 07:56:07PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Santiago Vila écrivait:
> > Perhaps we should open the Bug System to upstream maintainers by adding a
> > flag to every package. If this flag is on, reports are automatically
> > forwarded t
Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: cmatrix
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: optional
> Section: misc
> Installed-Size: 76
> Maintainer: Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Version: 1.0b-1
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1), libncurses4 (>= 4.2-3.1), xbase-clients (>=
> 3.3.3.1-5),
David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 05:32:13PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
>
> Did this message mess with GnuPG on any one else's system?
> I had to kill gpg (1.0.1-2) to get mutt to continue, and then
> I got
> [-- PGP output follows --]
> ...
> Good signature from
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:08:10AM -0600, David Starner wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 05:32:13PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
>
> Did this message mess with GnuPG on any one else's system?
> I had to kill gpg (1.0.1-2) to get mutt to continue, and then
> I got
> [-- PGP output follows --]
> ...
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 05:32:13PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
Did this message mess with GnuPG on any one else's system?
I had to kill gpg (1.0.1-2) to get mutt to continue, and then
I got
[-- PGP output follows --]
...
Good signature from ...
...
gpg: waiting for lock (hold by 829 - probably dea
Package: cmatrix
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: misc
Installed-Size: 76
Maintainer: Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 1.0b-1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1), libncurses4 (>= 4.2-3.1), xbase-clients (>=
3.3.3.1-5), kbd-compat | kbd
Description: Console Matrix simulates the
On 26 Mar 2000, Craig Brozefsky wrote:
> It's just an illustration of the problems of attempting to enforce
> your preferred policies upon others.
I'd call it self-defense, really.
--
"Kif, if there's one thing I don't need it's your 'I don't think that's
wise' attitude."
Nils Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > ORBS also blacklist sites for other reasons, such as if their probes are
> > firewalled out. This will, for example, catch sites that automatically
> > firewall out sites that attempt to relay through them - th
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 03:39:24PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> as jsut discussed on debian-devel, I would like to package John the
> Ripper. If someone already has done or is working on it, please mail me,
> then I will stop packing it. Otherwise I will try to upload this package
> till friday
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:51:50PM +0100 , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 12:31:54AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
> > Hi dear co-developers,
>
> Hey people ! I posted this mail in order to have some input ... it would
> be great if some of you gave their opinion about this pr
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 12:14:04PM +, Joseph Heenan wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Oliver Elphick" wrote:
>
> >
> > The nature of the problem is this:
> > There is a tendency for the image to be smeared to the right. This is
> > particularly noticeable with the mouse c
Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
>
> > Oh crap, you're right. I wasn't thinking on that one. Oh well, I guess
> > somebody will have to find good colour combinations for every colour
> > package.
>
> I can do that. Black on white. Proven to work
> perfectly for centuries. Or do you only read books wit
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
> The point exactly.. If RBL or RSS blacklists someone, it's a known
> spammer or a site which has refused to act against spammers abusing their
> systems. In these instances, the blacklisting happens as a last resort.
But you can't keep up with the amo
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 16:57:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rmdir --ignore-... and chmod --reference
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:34:37PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> > Unfortunately, it demonstrates that ORBS is a little more indiscriminant
> > than perhaps is good.
>
> Yes; because innocent people do get caught in the middle of it. But it's
> the only method to fight open relays. I've said it befor
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:12:26AM +1000, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> There has been some discussion about packaging GOB on the lists.
> If they are OK and a developer is prepared to sponsor me I'd love
> to have the packages added to the distribution.
I already uploaded a package to Incoming.
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> > > Given every report I've heard to the contrary, I'm not sure I believe
> > > that. I've also been told that there are cases where their tests produce
> > > false positives.
This used to be
Hello
Sorry for asking again about my problem but I can't make my
letter E work in bash (neither in console nor xterm). See what
happens:
- "E" is treated like a dead key. It is not showed at first time, but
when you press another key after "E", it beeps
- "E" works in other programs and
Le Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:12:26AM +1000, Robert Graham Merkel écrivait:
> There has been some discussion about packaging GOB on the lists.
>
> I have made some test packages which should be available from:
>
> http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~rgmerk/software
>
> If they are OK and a developer is prepare
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
> Or it appears to have been accepted and goes nowhere. I've seen a setup
> or two like this specifically for the purposes of tracking who was trying
> to use the relay...
Just check your reject log for ip adresses ;-)
If someone has some weird setup li
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> > Given every report I've heard to the contrary, I'm not sure I believe
> > that. I've also been told that there are cases where their tests produce
> > false positives.
>
> I don't see how you can create a false positive on a relay te
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 10:11:57AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 12:54:39AM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> > Why does debian have to be different than the rest of the world in
> > everything? Why do I get colors when I set TERM=xterm? there was already
> > xterm-color and
On 26 Mar 2000, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
> postmaster at a host I co-admin got mail from ORBS a few days before
> Christmas of 1999. We were given four weeks to fix our open relay,
> plenty of logs and a reasonable amount of help from the ORBS website
> on how to fix it. The only difficult part
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 09:00:34AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The whole file --- verifying each entry would take at least three minutes
> on my hardware, and god knows how long on anything moderately old or
> outdated. I certainly wouldn't want to try it on m68k on a regular basis,
> eg. (If doi
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > afaik, ORBS sends to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What other right place could there
> > be?
>
> The domain's technical contact.
Might be a good idea to do this in addition to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I
fail to see where this is "better" - Most domains have quite
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Mark Brown wrote:
> ORBS also blacklist sites for other reasons, such as if their probes are
> firewalled out. This will, for example, catch sites that automatically
> firewall out sites that attempt to relay through them - the site notices
> the first check, blocks the rest
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 15:22:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug never reassigned
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 15:17:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FHS man pages not found by the old man-db
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
There has been some discussion about packaging GOB on the lists.
I have made some test packages which should be available from:
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~rgmerk/software
If they are OK and a developer is prepared to sponsor me I'd love
to have the packages added to the distribution.
--
-
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:05:40AM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> ORBS blocks all open relays. A lot of people have open relays. Since open
> relays still do not have any reason for existence other than admin
> ignorance, the "correct" way here would be to block all open relays and
ORBS also blacklis
Le Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 09:39:09PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt écrivait:
> I think we are closing bugs for the sake of it here. Any reason
> why the suggestion can't be implemented? (ie make base-files.postinst
Yes, because Santiago Vila doesn't want it and because it looks like
a crude hack. If you rea
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:42:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Mechanism for detecting unmaintained packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:03:27AM -, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> The base package doesn't exist any more for quite a long time, those first
> time Debian user are most of them quite good and knows what to do to
> correct this problem. Furthermore for those who can't, they simply have
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Uh, I can find at least one site real quickly whose admin will tell you
>that he got a message from ORBS, fixed the problem, was blacklisted
>anyway, and it took him a month to get off that list even though the
>problem was
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:59:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line base mess
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 02:41:09AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> The domain's technical contact.
Ideally, yes. In practice, I'd say that's no more likely to work
than [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen NIC entries with technical contacts
called "NOC Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"; do you think hotmai
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey people ! I posted this mail in order to have some input ... it would
> be great if some of you gave their opinion about this proposition I posted
> a while ago :
Just like everyone else: A great idea to which I have no futher idears
right now.
If
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:15:42AM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> > ORBS has a tendancy to not take the time to make sure their messages go to
> > the right places and then they are very slow to take sites off the list
> > after problems are fixed.
>
> afaik, ORBS sends to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What other
Nils Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And taking people off the list is automatic. Fix it, enter the IP in their
> form, it gets re-cehcekd and taken off the list. Works like a charm.
My recent experience with ORBS backs this up.
> If people configured their servers correctly, they'd never ge
As discussed on the debian-hams list, I am packaging xastir.
Xastir is an X client for APRS, the Automatic Position Reporting System.
In APRS, objects (houses, cars, people or whatever) report their position
on the air. (Usually their position is obtained using GPS for mobile
objects, or entered
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 10:35:02AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> e2fscheck always tells me it cannot read the superblock. Up to 2.3.4? it
> worked well. And of course 2.2.14 runs without a problem.
Do you have an IDE ZIP drive? I believe I had the same problem starting
around 2.3.43. The probl
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:48:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old bug reports related to bo->hamm transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:48:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old bug reports related to bo->hamm transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:48:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old bug reports related to bo->hamm transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:36:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Good sources.list file with non-US
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 10:35:02AM +0200 , Michael Meskes wrote:
> e2fscheck always tells me it cannot read the superblock. Up to 2.3.4? it
> worked well. And of course 2.2.14 runs without a problem.
check that you don't mount devfs, and have IDE subsystem compiled in (it
changed location).
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:41:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line subarch for i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:46:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line old kde packages and qt lib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
e2fscheck always tells me it cannot read the superblock. Up to 2.3.4? it
worked well. And of course 2.2.14 runs without a problem.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz| Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:21:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bad non-US line in its sources.list
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:30:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ITP with URLs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:26:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Themes in debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:23:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug fixed by now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote:
> ORBS has a tendancy to not take the time to make sure their messages go to
> the right places and then they are very slow to take sites off the list
> after problems are fixed.
afaik, ORBS sends to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What other right place could there
be
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 10:49:09AM +0200, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> > ORBS deserves special mention because of their insane hit count, I don't
> > know what that is about but ORBS would block 10% of the mails we get. I
> > think it is without question that the majority of those blocks are
> > legiti
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> ORBS deserves special mention because of their insane hit count, I don't
> know what that is about but ORBS would block 10% of the mails we get. I
> think it is without question that the majority of those blocks are
> legitimate mails. ORBS is also alm
* Jason Gunthorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000326 08:45]:
>[...]
>ORBS - 314
> Comparing connections it is found that 3970 out of 40236 connection
> attempts would have been blocked. This can be roughly considered to be
> 3970 emails blocked.
>[...]
> ORBS deserves special mention because of
I have packaged 'pcrd', which is a utility for controlling an Icom PCR-1000
radio receiver. It is probably mostly of interest to amateur radio folk,
and so will go in the hamradio section.
The upstream site for this package is
http://www.mv.net/ipusers/cdwalker/pcrd.html
The PCR-1000 it
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 11:28:24PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> A perusal of the DUL ips all suggest they are *all* modems which is a
> really selective filter swath. No DSL or Cable IPs appear to be listed!
Well, I don't know about the US, but I suspect that's because you can
have a dialup ac
Okay, since everyone really desperately wants to know, I ran the numbers
on the effectiveness of RBL, RSS, DUL and ORBS against the mail intake for
lists.debian.org. All of this is theoretical and done offline against the
log file, we are blocking only via RBL (and now RSS)
The period of analysi
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:43:51AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
>
> I'm not sure about this, but I think there's no web frontend for mail in
> Debian, so I am going to try to package twig.
Well, there's IMP... but twig looks nice, so don't let that stop your
ITP :-)
--
Alisdair McDiarmid
Hello,
I'm not sure about this, but I think there's no web frontend for mail in
Debian, so I am going to try to package twig.
I have not seen any entry for this app in WNPP, but if anyone really wants
this package, I have no problem giving it away.
Taken from fm's description,
TWIG is a web-base
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:51:50PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hey people ! I posted this mail in order to have some input ... it would
> be great if some of you gave their opinion about this proposition I posted
> a while ago :
[..]
I'd have to bookmark myself. ;>
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 11:03:11PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So my question is, what are your thoughts on adding a signature to the
> > current Packages.gz file, or adding a similar *dsc file for it,
> > which is then signed?
>
> Do you want to
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 10:40:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
[snip]
>
> > > With this system, each developer can add his own page on one of his
> > > bookmark and from time to time he can check what he's responsible for and
> > > what he should do in one look.
> [snip]
>
> It would be my first b
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 12:54:39AM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> Why does debian have to be different than the rest of the world in
> everything? Why do I get colors when I set TERM=xterm? there was already
> xterm-color and xterm-debian which could do colors.
Other Linux distributions tend to
88 matches
Mail list logo