> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> Taking a step back, what I'm objecting to here is that I think
Russ> people are implicitly extending the definition of a source
Russ> package to include the VCS and implicitly assuming that we're
Russ> going to require people to use a VCS
Hello everybody out there!
I am using Debian 10:
$ cat /etc/debian_version
10.1
I am running the real-time kernel from standard distribution
repositories:
$ uname -a
Linux petra 5.2.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Debian
5.2.9-2~bpo10+1 (2019-08-25) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Sam Hartman:
>> "Bastian" == Bastian Blank writes:
>
> Bastian> Hi Sam
> Bastian> On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 05:35:10PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >> The Salsa CA pipeline is recommended.
>
> Bastian> For this I need to use my veto as Salsa admin. With the CI
> Bastian> pe
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 01:16:26AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> However, basically, what you're saying is that, for those who care
>> about not using non-free platforms, we should just not do that anymore,
>> as it's not required anyway.
> No.
> If this were about a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Noteng
* Package name: scantailor-advanced
Version : 1.0.17~2019.08.16-1
Upstream Author : 4lex4 <4le...@zoho.com>
* URL : https://github.com/4lex4/scantailor-advanced/
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: C++
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
* Package name: lwt-log
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Shawn Wagner and Jérémie Dimino
* URL : https://github.com/ocsigen/lwt_log
* License : LGPL-2.0+
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : Lwt-
Hi,
On 15/9/19 3:31 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 9/14/19 6:59 AM, Balasankar "Balu" C wrote:
>> But it shouldn't matter to the project that I do my packaging work in
>> GitLab.com or GitHub.com because as far as Debian is concerned, as long
>> as others can contribute without having an account i
Hi,
On 15/9/19 1:27 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> Are there additional resources either the salsa admins or the salsa CI
>> team needs to move forward to a place where you'd both feel comfortable
>> recommending Salsa CI?
>
> We need to sit down and disuss between the admins first what we exactly
> "Sean" == Sean Whitton writes:
>>>
>>> I would already assume any branch prefixed with 'wip' might be
>>> rebased myself, but others might be surprised.
>>
>> I would like to have this documented somewhere so that people
>> dont get surprised. I am not particularly
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 01:16:26AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 9/15/19 12:06 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > There's nothing that requires you to interact with a VCS repository that
> > you
> > don't care to.
>
> But I do care about using Git, and interacting with other DDs using it.
Cool.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 12:01:24AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> It is a real life experience that I had to touch horribly maintained
> packages by unknown contributors, with Vcs-Git:
> https://github.com//, missing commits not matching the
> archive, and no response from the maintainer to the BTS
Debian doesn't add ESNI Record into it's Name Server.
Check here (ONLINE dig):
https://toolbox.googleapps.com/apps/dig/#TXT/
Check these two domains:
_esni.debian.org
_esni.cloudflare.com
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 5:31 AM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 5:48 AM Anthony DeRobertis wro
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 00:04:14 +0200, Guillem Jover
wrote:
>On Sat, 2019-09-14 at 13:07:09 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:05:20 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> > On Thu 12 Sep 2019 at 09:35PM +02, Marc Haber wrote:
>> > > How about documenting that branches prefixed with "wip" can
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 09:57:15AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:00:37PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > Bastian> For this I need to use my veto as Salsa admin. With the CI
> > Bastian> people we have to work through too much problems first.
After thinking about i
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:00:37PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Bastian> For this I need to use my veto as Salsa admin. With the CI
> Bastian> people we have to work through too much problems first.
> What I am hearing you say is that right now, as service admins, you
> cannot support the C
Anthony DeRobertis writes:
> On 9/12/19 8:57 AM, Ansgar wrote:
>> I don't see much value in this requirement (besides additional work).
>> One should look at the repository anyway whan planning to do changes
>> (to match the existing style used); one would naturally see how files
>> are organized.
16 matches
Mail list logo
