Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-08 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Branden Robinson may or may not have written... > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: >> It wan't asking for help, it was asking that we change the way we do >> things for their minor benefit. >> Thinking that the world revolves around yourself is a seriou

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-07 Thread Ava Driscoll
I did not intend to send an Email that could not be replied to. However, I will send this post to let you know I do have Email -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:56, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > Also the Driscoll is very annoying by using a false email address so it > > can't be replied to. > > As far as I'm concerned, mail that can't be replied to *is* spam. Fair enough. A

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > It wan't asking for help, it was asking that we change the way we do things > for their minor benefit. > > Thinking that the world revolves around yourself is a serious attitude > problem, and not something that we want to pander t

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > Also the Driscoll is very annoying by using a false email address so it can't > be replied to. As far as I'm concerned, mail that can't be replied to *is* spam. -- Glenn Maynard

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 07:35, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 02:59:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Given the tone of Driscoll's messages to us, whom are innocent > > bystanders in this affair, I think your solution is quite unlikely to > > happen. > > Huh? What's wrong with

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Richard Braakman
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 02:59:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Given the tone of Driscoll's messages to us, whom are innocent > bystanders in this affair, I think your solution is quite unlikely to > happen. Huh? What's wrong with the tone? The first message wasn't to us, it was to the spam

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 11:46:47PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 18:22, Ava Driscoll wrote: > > I have sent a complaint regarding SPAM abuse to Yahoo regarding the > > originator of the SPAM. Perhaps I am not the only Ava Driscoll in the > > world. However, it is the name of my

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 18:22, Ava Driscoll wrote: > I have sent a complaint regarding SPAM abuse to Yahoo regarding the > originator of the SPAM. Perhaps I am not the only Ava Driscoll in the > world. However, it is the name of my web portfolio site and the only > name I ever had. I am against SPAM

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 02:46:57PM -0700, Ava Driscoll wrote: > I do not appreciate the following showing up: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01662.html > > Please cease and desist using my name. Thank you. It's not us, it's some random spammer whose spam happ

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 12:38:48AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > > However, pulling that message from the list archives may be a good idea. > > It's what Ava Driscoll asked for, and the big HTML links sure don't look > > good on the Debian pages. > > Debian is not in the habit of editing its histo

Re: Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Ava Driscoll
I have sent a complaint regarding SPAM abuse to Yahoo regarding the originator of the SPAM. Perhaps I am not the only Ava Driscoll in the world. However, it is the name of my web portfolio site and the only name I ever had. I am against SPAM and it hurts to have it associated with my name in

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 12:38:48AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > Debian is not in the habit of editing its history (mailing list > archives). Don't start down that slope. Spam is routinely removed from the BTS. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 01:26:00 -0400, Daniel Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:34:32AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> However, pulling that message from the list archives may be a good >>> idea. It's what Ava Driscoll asked

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Mathieu Roy
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:34:32AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > However, pulling that message from the list archives may be a good idea. > > It's what Ava Driscoll asked for, and the big HTML links sure don't look > > good on the Debian pages. > >

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-06 Thread Daniel Martin
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:34:32AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: >> However, pulling that message from the list archives may be a good idea. >> It's what Ava Driscoll asked for, and the big HTML links sure don't look >> good on the Debian pages. > > Debian

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-05 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:34:32AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > However, pulling that message from the list archives may be a good idea. > It's what Ava Driscoll asked for, and the big HTML links sure don't look > good on the Debian pages. Debian is not in the habit of editing its history (mailin

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-05 Thread benfoley
On Friday 05 September 2003 23:34, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Richard Braakman wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:12:35PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > > On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Ava Driscoll wrote: > > > > I do not appreciate the following showing up: > > > > http://lists.debian.org/d

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-05 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:12:35PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Ava Driscoll wrote: > > > I do not appreciate the following showing up: > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01662.html > > > > That

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-05 Thread Richard Braakman
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:12:35PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Ava Driscoll wrote: > > I do not appreciate the following showing up: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01662.html > > That email was sent by a virus. This virus is really nasty.

RE: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-05 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
- From: Ava Driscoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:47 PM To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]   Original Message Subject: False Representation at Google.com Date

Re: [Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-05 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Ava Driscoll wrote: > > > Original Message > Subject: False Representation at Google.com > Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 14:20:27 -0700 > From: Ava Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I

[Fwd: False Representation at Google.com]

2003-09-05 Thread Ava Driscoll
Original Message Subject: False Representation at Google.com Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 14:20:27 -0700 From: Ava Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To