> I rarely use pine myself (usually only when I have to read some
> MIME-encrypted mail :-), but I know it's quite popular. It would
> be a pity if we can't ship a MIME-aware mailer with the standard
> distribution.
How odd...
I seem to have a /usr/bin/exmh, and exmh isn't in my /usr/local/bin.
On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, Marek Michalkiewicz wrote:
> The current version of pine is in non-free because the copyright
> is not clear.
The onus rests on the pine maintainer, not me, so I'm reassigning this
to pine.
Guy
Dale Scheetz wrote:
> The copyright is quite clear. You can not distribute this package for a
> fee without first getting permission from the pine developers. According
> to our policy this requires it go into non-free.
Now I noticed that the copyright has changed, the new one (same in
version 3.9
On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, Marek Michalkiewicz wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
>
> The current version of pine is in non-free because the copyright
> is not clear. We really should talk to the maintainers - perhaps
> we can get permission to distribute the package as part of the
> distribution? (FYI
Package: ftp.debian.org
The current version of pine is in non-free because the copyright
is not clear. We really should talk to the maintainers - perhaps
we can get permission to distribute the package as part of the
distribution? (FYI, it's in Red Hat, and those guys are quite
careful about cop
5 matches
Mail list logo
