Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emanuele Rocca
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-r...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: parsec-tool
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Parsec Project Contributors
* URL : https://github.com/parallaxsecond/parsec-t
Greetings,
On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 03:57:59AM +, matt quintanilla wrote:
Package name : discord
Severity: ITP
Package name: discord
Version: 0.0.27
Upstream Author: https://discord.com
URL: https://discord.com
License: custom
Description: All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers
Copyright:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 10:11:50AM +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> I've never heard that Discord was Free Software.
Of course it isn't.
Hello,
On Fri 30 Jun 2023 at 12:31PM +02, Ansgar wrote:
> We've had a decade of that about systemd, probably more if one looks at
> Pulseaudio, GNOME and other things. Eventually we might reach a point
> where we might want to stop that. Sadly I don't see you asking for that
> to happen, rather t
Alastair McKinstry writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 08:55:11PM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
>>> Bookworm is now out; I will shortly be increasing the severity of
>>> the outstanding bugs to RC, with the intention being to remove
>>> src:pcre3 from Debian before the trixie release.
[snip]
> Th
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 10:38:39AM +0200, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 10:11:50AM +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> > I've never heard that Discord was Free Software.
> Of course it isn't.
Not yet.
Andreas Henriksson writes:
> If you want me to take suggestions like coordination seriously then
> please consider adressing https://bugs.debian.org/934463 soon or admit
> that sysvinit maintenance lacks the resources to do coordinated
> transitions. Dropping things and letting people pick them u
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 11:35:33AM +0200, Typical wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 11:33:25AM +0200, We can do better wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 10:38:39AM +0200, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 10:11:50AM +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> > > > I've never heard that
Someone said on Matrix that we aren't going to have official release goals in
future. If so that doesn't stop people from doing the work just makes it less
of an issue to release with some of the bugs unsolved.
https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SystemdAnalyzeSecurity
I think we should make
Hi Russell
On 2023/07/03 14:37, Russell Coker wrote:
Someone said on Matrix that we aren't going to have official release goals in
future.
One shouldn't trust everything that is read on Matrix. I suggest asking
the release team for clarification, because my last understanding is
that release
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fab Stz
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: kalkun
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Contact: Fab Stz
* URL : https://kalkun.sourceforge.io/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : O
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
Owner: tous
* Package name: golang-github-xhit-go-str2duration
Version : 2.1.0-1
Upstream Author : Santiago De la Cruz
* URL : https://github.com/xhit/go-str2dura
Russell Coker writes:
> https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SystemdAnalyzeSecurity
>
> I think we should make it a release goal to have as many daemons as
> possible running with systemd security features to aim for a low score
> from "systmd- analyze security".
This repos from Trent Buck has
On 2023-07-03 14:21, RL wrote:
Russell Coker writes:
https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SystemdAnalyzeSecurity
I think we should make it a release goal to have as many daemons as
possible running with systemd security features to aim for a low score
from "systmd- analyze security".
It wou
On Mon, 03 Jul 2023 at 20:21:20 +0100, RL wrote:
> (One of the issues for services that send email is that it is very
> easy to break exim)
It's also very easy to break anything else that relies on running a
setuid/setgid/setcap executable (including many mail delivery agents,
not just Exim), as t
On Jul 03, RL wrote:
> (One of the issues for services that send email is that it is very
> easy to break exim)
NoNewPrivileges breaks by design anything which depends on suid, so Exim
and (in the default configuration) Postfix.
I agree that we should do much better in terms on sandboxing,
con
Hi,
Jonathan Carter (2023-07-03):
> One shouldn't trust everything that is read on Matrix. I suggest asking
> the release team for clarification, because my last understanding is
> that release goals still exist, it's just that the release team doesn't
> want to be the entity pushing it.
FWIW, j
RL writes:
> Russell Coker writes:
>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SystemdAnalyzeSecurity
>>
>> I think we should make it a release goal to have as many daemons as
>> possible running with systemd security features to aim for a low score
>> from "systmd-analyze security".
>
>
> This re
19 matches
Mail list logo
