. I've talked to upstream about fixing the build, and they agree
that removal is what's appropriate at the present time.
--
Sean Whitton
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: stylish-hask...@packages.debian.org,
debian-haskell@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:stylish-haskell
Orphaned: #1017878
FTBFS since 2022: #1017205
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
with our ghc package. I think we should remove them to permit
migration.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: tag -1 + pending
Hello,
On Thu 23 Feb 2023 at 12:27PM -04, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Joey, do you know why d/control restricts these build deps as it does?
>
> IIRC some of those deps are or were not available on some architectures
> like m68k. And t
ly
> enabled
> for a subset of architectures, namely those where the build dependency
> doesn't arise
Joey, do you know why d/control restricts these build deps as it does?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
so it restricts itself to formatting only
some parts of the Haskell code piped to it, such as import
statements.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
an and DHG_packages repos and get yourself into a position
where you can help update versions bounds in package metadata, refresh
patches etc.
--
Sean Whitton
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-haskell@lists.debian.org
Please drop hothasktags from sid. It has been unbuildable for more than
a year and no-one seems sufficiently interested in the package.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
gt;
> Does anyone plan to package the new "citeproc"?
I guess that this will happen when pandoc itself gets updated.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Wed 24 Nov 2021 at 02:21AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Hi Sean, Richard,
>
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:20:04 -0700 Sean Whitton
> wrote:
>> Source: git-annex
>> Version: 8.20210223-2
>> Severity: serious
>> git-annex recently began to FTBFS on 32-bi
** [Makefile:58: git-annex] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_auto_build: error: make -j4 "INSTALL=install --strip-program=true"
returned exit code 2
make: *** [debian/rules:31: build-arch] Error 25
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ore likely to be in use by end users, and there are far fewer of them?
A few other examples from the list are pandoc-citeproc-preamble (which I
know people are using to build documents, including me) and debug-me.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
using it; thus, I request an adopter for the
propellor package.
The package description is:
Propellor ensures that the system it's run in satisfies a list of
properties, taking action as necessary when a property is not yet met.
.
It is configured using haskell.
--
Sean Whitton
hown that new upstream versions which trigger the need
for a change in the binary packages often result in the need for
significant updates to d/copyright, so a full check is done.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hat a new
> browser goes through?
I think in this case Clint meant that haskell-binary-instances would
need to go through NEW, not the new github library.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ackage them.
>
> NB! Please do *not* upload a Pandoc without coordinating with me.
May I ask where you are with pandoc atm?
pandoc-citeproc and pandoc-citeproc-preamble are broken and I believe
fixing them needs newer pandoc.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
no longer depends on it. Thank you
for your efforts!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
efully applying this patch and marking the upload as closing this
bug, but if Ilias thinks we should still consider dropping this library
for the reason that it's unmaintained, he should reopen the bug.
--
Sean Whitton
C 8.8, is not part of Stackage and has no rev
> dependencies.
>
> I intend to remove this package.
keysafe, in experimental, depends on haskell-readline.
CCing upstream: Joey, do you think it would be possible for keysafe to
migrate to use something maintained?
--
Sean Whitton
an option to test-package-plan.pl which limits it to
packages given in lts.config.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> join this channel, '/msg NickServ help' to learn how to register and verify.)
>
> what is wrong ? I do not have this problem with other debian irc chanel
Presumably someone set it that way to prevent spam. You'll need to
register with NickServ.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
mits to our repos from machines we
don't personally control. Porterboxes are generally considered to be
insecure, suitable for testing things, but not as part of the package
delivery pipeline.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
all and
> produce the packages ready for upload ?
I have a propellor config to produce a machine like this and some
credits which were donated by Exoscale for DHG to use. Shall I fire it
up? Send me an SSH public key.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I take it that I have permission (or encouragement, or
> whatever) to do so now.
The issue is not really actionable at the distro level -- we wouldn't
add a patch to change this behaviour.
So it sounds like the discussion should indeed be moved to the upstream
bug tracker.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Mon 04 May 2020 at 05:17PM +02, Marco Ricci wrote:
> Thus wrote Sean Whitton:
>> On Sun 03 May 2020 at 08:57am +02, Marco Ricci wrote:
>>> After upgrading the repository format to v8, `git annex add` sometimes
>>> treats ordinary files stored in a dotdir the
forced to
> git by default unless I set `annex.dotfiles`, but I do not expect this to
> happen with non-dotfiles, even if they are located within dotdirs.
So what you are suggesting is that git-annex should treat all files
within dotdirs as if they were themselves dotfiles?
--
Sean Whitton
y config, since you use propellor:
https://git.spwhitton.name/propellor/tree/src/Propellor/Property/SiteSpecific/SPW.hs#n575
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Thu 09 Apr 2020 at 08:26PM -04, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> a couple of weeks have passed now, any progress on this effort?
I started it but was not able to do a lot and others have not been
active, I'm afraid.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sat 28 Mar 2020 at 03:45PM +01, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Gentle ping.
Typically we try to build all the libghc-* packages against the new GHC
in experimental before uploading anything to unstable. That hasn't
happened yet which is why things haven't moved.
--
Sean Whitton
URL : https://hackage.haskell.org/package/bytestring
> * License : BSD-3
> Programming Lang: Haskell
> Description : Fast, compact, strict and lazy byte strings with a list
> interface
This library is bundled with ghc. I believe that it shouldn't
Hello,
On Mon 18 Nov 2019 at 12:10AM +00, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> Ack, can I remove that part from the wiki? Don't wanna do it without
> somebody from the team agreeing with it.
Sorry, but I don't have time to review it right now, so I'd prefer not
to say yes to th
ng team uploads.
You probably want to stay away from any gbp commands.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
See #911024 for more info.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
th Debian, I would consider the amount of work to be
completely unwieldy for a single contributor.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
it up-to-date is a requirement of the official
backports policy.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
prevents the
> transition to ghc 8.6.5 on my laptop for (I think) two weeks.
Unfortunately only a few people have access to schedule such builds, and
I am not one of them.
However, since you kindly let me know that it does currently build, I've
uploaded the latest upstream release instead
again on sid.
Yes, there are issues with binNMUs right now. See the other thread on
the d-haskell mailing list.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Fri 06 Sep 2019 at 08:55AM +02, Félix Sipma wrote:
> Is there something blocking the migration of propellor? It seems it just
> needs a binNMU.
5.6.0-1 is in both unstable and testing?
I have been waiting to upload a new upstream release until the binNMU
situation improves.
--
to backport it to what's currently in sid?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ns we won't support that hardware for git-annex" kind
> of bug.
This would mean reassigning it to git-annex, wouldn't it?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
will have to package singletons.
I've packaged it in DHG_packages.git. I don't know if it will build yet
but d/copyright is done, at least.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y homework and reading first, but I'd rather sit on the
> computer and get it all done in one (large) step than in a lot of
> intermittent little steps.
I understand, but Debian development very rarely works that way.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
pain atm.)
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
upload: ...".
Thank you for your interest.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Thu 25 Oct 2018 at 03:00PM +0200, Félix Sipma wrote:
> Is there something preventing the update to a newer version of git-annex, now
> that the transition is almost done? This bug is quite annoying...
Yes. git-annex is not yet buildable. I try it every few days...
--
Sean W
https://salsa.debina.org/haskell-team/package-plan
https://salsa.debina.org/haskell-team/DHG_packages
and join #debian-haskell on OFTC.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ate of testing (this is the reason that debug-me is not in
stretch-backports).
Therefore, the only way to fix what you've reported is to prepare stable
updates to the Haskell libraries. FAOD I won't be able to do this, but
someone else could.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
expected to be
> released later today.
Thank you for your attention.
--
Sean Whitton
Package: pandoc
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 elpa-ebib
Dear maintainer,
When pandoc builds --standalone HTML output, it includes a reference to
an online copy of html5shiv-printshiv.min.js. For a Debian package
build-depending on pandoc to generate HTML documentation, th
Hello,
On Tue, May 29 2018, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> ... and it turns out my build does not reproduce the problem.
Just to be clear, you mean without Joey's patch?
--
Sean Whitton
is isn't enough information about how to reproduce this bug for me to
be comfortable forwarding it upstream, but I've CCed upstream just in
case he recognises the error message.
--
Sean Whitton
eeding to be stripped.
I did not catch this. Glad you did.
Thank you for your understanding!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
doc now.
>
> Thanks for nudging,
Er. I just did a team upload of 2.1.2, after migrating the repo to
salsa.
I pinged #debian-haskell on IRC but it would have been better if I'd
also replied to this thread. I hope you have not wasted too much time,
Jonas.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
taffybar package
> (#895264).
>
> I do not plan on maintaining this, and hope someone will magically
> step up to do so. :) But I would certainly use the resulting taffybar,
> which I'm pretty excited about...
All GHC libs are team-maintained. We just do them all together.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
g-php -> php-team, etc.). If there are no objections,
> I will go with `haskell-team`.
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/12/msg00428.html [2]
> https://salsa.debian.org/explore/groups
+1 for haskell-team.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ndividual
libraries.
What has to happen first is ghc 8.2 moved experimental->unstable.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 25 2017, Clint Adams wrote:
> I'm fixing the propellor version in the package-plan.
Sorry for always forgetting to do this.
> Stackage LTS 10 should appear soon. Should we wait for it or go to
> GHC 8.2.2 now?
What would be the advantage of not waiting?
--
ing +dsfg made it sound like the previous package
> was not DFSG compliant.
I've filed a minor bug to track this.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n the source package, and
repacking to remove it just makes things unnecessarily more complicated
for people maintaining the package.
(further, since the repack is not an issue of freeness, the correct
version suffix is +ds not +dsfg)
Thanks again.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description
ght want to look at
my package stylish-haskell.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nice if we didn't have to wait on humans to do that -- it
would save time if the binNMU state was more up-to-date because they
were scheduled automatically while the rest of us were sleeping.
Thanks!
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-wb-team/2017/06/msg00021.html
--
Sean Whitton
signatur
Hello,
The following need to be packaged and uploaded to NEW before we can get
much further, if someone is up for it:
cryptonite-conduit
data-clist
here
uri-bytestring-aeson
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Sep 02 2017, Sean Whitton wrote:
> This afternoon I started upgrading to LTS 9.2 on the lts-9.2 branch.
> Not merged to master yet because package plan isn't yet passing.
>
> Please work on that branch rather than making changes to master, to
> avoid duplicating any
s-9.2 may be merged to master.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Aug 14 2017, Marcel Fourné wrote:
> Shall I tag the commit for upload or does this happen on upload?
The uploader will do it.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 07:00:27PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Sean Whitton (2017-07-18 18:44:20)
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 05:51:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > dep-wait? Where is that documented so I can learn more?
> >
> > I believe
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 05:51:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> dep-wait? Where is that documented so I can learn more?
I believe Gianfranco means: confirm the Haskell part of the package is
actually buildable using (e.g.) `dht build-all`, and then do a
source-only upload.
--
Sean Whit
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 02:39:06PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I opened an haddock upstream bug report
Thanks :) I've subscribed.
For others: https://github.com/haskell/haddock/issues/574
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
disable the docs?
> I failed to find the place for the upstream code location to see if
> there were updates/commits
There has been no update since 2014.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ds bumped in their cabal files?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-emacsen team can fix this sort of thing across all packages.
http://pkg-emacsen.alioth.debian.org/elpa-hello/
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e package being configured.
To prevent this getting lost, please use reportbug(1) to file a bug
against haskell-devscripts. reportbug will prompt you to tag the bug
'patch', and you can attach your patch to the e-mail.
Thanks!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
reference https://
> packages.debian.org/unstable/pandoc ), which was released on 17 July 2016
If this hasn't happened about a month from now, please check back --
we're concentrating on the move to GHC version 8.
--
Sean Whitton
-1 # please obtain key from
keyring.debian.org
gbp buildpackage
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ckaged. For your own personal
package, maybe you could bundle it all into one package with stack. You
won't find any scripts and tools in Debian to do that, though, since we
wouldn't be able to use them to make official packages.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello Damien,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:01:58AM +0200, Damien Couroussé wrote:
> Does anyone here use stack to build Debian packages? Is it possible?
Could you explain why you'd want to do this? To take advantage of
upstream stack config files?
--
Sean Whitton
reporter) everywhere I can, work as a developer and system
> administrator part-time, and as a farmer most of my time (not the usual
> job for debian contributors I guess :-)).
Go ahead and submit a request to join pkg-haskell on alioth.debian.org
--
Sean Whitton
ion
number updated in package-plan.git so that the team won't accidently
break your package.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:29:08PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I'd be grateful if someone could review & sponsor the following
> libraries (keysafe dependencies):
>
> - finite-field
> - type-level-numbers
> - polynomial
> - dice-entropy-conduit
> - se
-1.dsc
Or build it with gbp:
gbp clone --pristine-tar https://git.spwhitton.name/zxcvbn-c
git checkout debian/0.20150103-1
git verify-tag debian/0.20150103-1 # my key is in DM keyring
gbp buildpackage
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello all,
I'd be grateful if someone could review & sponsor the following
libraries (keysafe dependencies):
- finite-field
- type-level-numbers
- polynomial
- dice-entropy-conduit
- secret-sharing
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 08:38:29PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I need to package the following Haskell libraries first. If anyone
> wants to help me with that, please drop me a line to co-ordinate
> efforts.
>
> libghc-dice-entropy-dev
> libghc-finite-field-dev
> libghc-raa
need to package the following Haskell libraries first. If anyone
wants to help me with that, please drop me a line to co-ordinate
efforts.
libghc-dice-entropy-dev
libghc-finite-field-dev
libghc-raaz-dev
libghc-zxcvbn-c-dev
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:44:37AM +0200, José A. Romero L. wrote:
> I've just installed the latest packages (version 1.0.2-1+b1) and they seem to
> be working fine. Thanks a lot!
Ah, sorry for the noise -- the package tracker doesn't show binNMUs.
--
Sean Whitton
signature
haskell.txt
It doesn't look like enclosed-exceptions is going to be NMUed. Just
things that depend on it.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
le with all other
> dependencies that rely on the current version, which is
> libghc-lifted-base-dev-0.2.3.8-59abe.
enclosed-exceptions's cabal file claims compatibility with lifted-base
0.2.3.8, so we just need to binNMU enclosed-exceptions, right?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
r the
packages I have DM rights for.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:24:07PM +0200, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> I guess GHC, like other Haskell programs, doesn't even have meaningful
> debugging symbols. Can someone confirm this, so we can just drop the
> dbgsym package?
Confirmed. GHC is built with GHC.
--
Sean Whitton
ed with ghc. Then this would work for haskell
packages that don't use haskell-devscripts. Is that feasible?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
oid clogging the already over-worked arm buildds.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ch Debian currently
supports, right? So far as I can see there's no way to mark an
exclusion.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ace for haskell-openglraw. It might be worth a try for
> agda.
I've made this change, confirmed the package still builds on amd64 and
marked agda 2.5.1-2 as ready for upload. I would be grateful if someone
would sponsor the upload.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
agda-stdlib has been pushed to collab-maint and is ready for upload.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t; available.
>
> Do you guys know of any major obstacles that would come up if GHC has
> a build dependency on Alex and Happy?
It might make it hard to add a new architecture to Debian. See
<https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBootstrap>. I don't know enough to judge
how hard it
does one do in this situation with the buildds?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
uploaded. (I don't have the
ability to push to the collab-maint repo myself.)
[1] https://git.spwhitton.name/agda-stdlib
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
bian/ of my package to
> DHG_packages with UNRELEASED and ask for a sponsor, right?
No, you should run `dch -r` when you want it to be sponsored, and then
ask on this list or on IRC.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ilt in sid any more sice cpphs was upgraded to 1.20.1:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=agda&suite=unstable
I'm working on packaging agda 2.5.1 so this should be fixed v. soon.
Just to keep you informed.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ecipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed
`
Does anyone happen to know why agda wants to write to /usr, and how I
can stop it?
My work is at https://git.spwhitton.name/agda-stdlib if anyone wants to
hack on it themselves.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-shake&arch=i386&ver=0.15.6%2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1464809317
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo