Ludovico Cavedon writes:
> Hi all,
>
> There are some files like:
> -man page
> -.desktop file
> -menu file
> -menu icon
> which are architecture-independent. However, if you put them inside the
> "-data" package, lintian will complain (e.g. binary-without-manpage,
> desktop-command-not-in-packa
Julian Andres Klode writes:
> With debhelper (>= 7.0.50) you can add this to debian/rules:
>
> override_dh_installchangelogs:
> dh_installchangelogs RELEASE-NOTES
Now that debhelper 7.2.6 is in ‘squeeze’, I'm using the above, which
works fine. Thank you!
--
\ “Are you thinkin
Hi all,
There are some files like:
-man page
-.desktop file
-menu file
-menu icon
which are architecture-independent. However, if you put them inside the
"-data" package, lintian will complain (e.g. binary-without-manpage,
desktop-command-not-in-package, ...)
What is currently considered best pra
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:37:50 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'd
> personally tend to say that, doing the above and assuming my
> characterization is correct, it would be okay to put that in main.
Another precedent (and quite similar, since it's also an application
for a mobile phone, just symbian i
Chow Loong Jin writes:
> On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 10:53 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> That would mean it should go into contrib, which is for DFSG-free
>> things that can't be built or used without non-free bits.
> I'm actually considering using a postinst script to tell the user that
> there is a
Hi Jérémy,
On Donnerstag, 26. März 2009, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> is there a way to change a package dependency without rebuilding it ?
apt-cache show equivs
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6
of my package "stardata-common".
It builds these binary packages:
stardata-common - Common framework to manage astronomy packages
This package allows the installation and removal of astronomy catalogues,
converting those catalogu
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 10:53 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> That would mean it should go into contrib, which is for DFSG-free
> things
> that can't be built or used without non-free bits.
I'm actually considering using a postinst script to tell the user that
there is a .jar that they need to download
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wbar".
* Package name: wbar
Version : 1.3.3+dfsg1-1
Upstream Author : Rodolfo Granata
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/wbar/
* License : GPL
Section : x11
It builds these binary packages:
wbar
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.4+dfsg-2
of package "checkstyle".
It builds these binary packages:
checkstyle - checks Java source against a coding standard
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 512149
The package can be found
Chow Loong Jin writes:
> Regarding the DFSG-compliance of this .jar, I've looked through the
> DFSG, and don't see where this could be a problem. DFSG mainly prohibits
> distribution of binaries without sources. This is a binary with the
> source, but cannot be compiled due to a non-free build-de
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:29:06AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> The problem begins here: The Java portion has a build-dependency on Sun
> Microsystem's WTK[1], and it is not free[2].
Just to make sure, what exactly is not free?
a) the Java portion (and the Sun Microsystem's WTK)
b) only th
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clewn".
* Package name: clewn
Version : 1.14-1
Upstream Author : Xavier de Gaye
* URL : http://clewn.sourceforge.net
* License : GPLv2
Section : devel
It builds these binary packages:
clewn
In <01785aaa-09b5-4cff-826b-78f31bd27...@free.fr>, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>Distributing non-DFSG-free software in main, even if it
>[...] can be considered data...
All software can be considered data. That's the beauty of the Turing
machine abstraction and the von realization.
--
Boyd Stephen
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 18:15 +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you could provide the .jar in non-free, and the DFSG free part which
> actually runs on the host could Suggest this non-free package. You
> need to provide a mean to upload it to the cellphone from the Debian
> box.
>
> The
Le 26 mars 09 à 17:29, Chow Loong Jin a écrit :
[...]
The problem begins here: The Java portion has a build-dependency on
Sun
Microsystem's WTK[1], and it is not free[2]. However, this is just a
build dependency, and not a runtime dependency. In fact, the .jar
isn't
even supposed to run on
Hi all,
I've recently encountered an issue while packaging remuco (Bug #416379).
Remuco is a duplex remote control application (mobile phones <=> media
players). The mobile phone portion is written in Java, whereas the
portion that runs on the media player computer is written in Python.
For the P
Hi
Dne Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:21:29 +0100
Adam Ziaja napsal(a):
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mpview".
>
> Package name: mpview
> Version : 0.4.1-1
> Upstream Author : Martin Petricek
> URL : http://mpview.sourceforge.net
> License : GPL
>
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "png-sixlegs".
* Package name: png-sixlegs
Version : 1.3.0-1
Upstream Author : Chris Nokleberg
* URL : http://www.sixlegs.com/software/png/
* License : LGPL-2+
Section : Java
It builds these bin
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mpview".
Package name: mpview
Version : 0.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Martin Petricek
URL : http://mpview.sourceforge.net
License : GPL
Section : graphics
It builds these binary packages:
mp
At Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:28:30 +0900,
Hideki Yamane wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:48:47 +0900
> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > > It's less easy to maintain patches.
> > > > How do I patch a file inside that tarball?
> > >
> > > Okay, it's not easy to maintain patches. Yes.
> > > But upstream is
On Thursday 26 March 2009 03:40:50 Tristan Greaves wrote:
>Matthew Palmer wrote:
>>> One option would be to NOT include those two data files in the package,
>>> but then it would not be a particularly user friendly installation.
>> Producing unencumbered data files would seem to be the best option.
Hi,
is there a way to change a package dependency without rebuilding it ?
For example, gimp2.6 depends on libwebkit-1.0.1, and i want latest
libwebkit-1.0.2
installed. I don't really care to break that dependency since gimp will work
without libwebkit (although some stuff will be broken, but i do
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 08:40:50AM +, Tristan Greaves wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
>> [clue data files with copyrighted info]
>>> One option would be to NOT include those two data files in the package, but
>>> then it would not be a particularly user friendly installation.
>>
>> Producing une
Matthew Palmer wrote:
[clue data files with copyrighted info]
One option would be to NOT include those two data files in the package, but
then it would not be a particularly user friendly installation.
Producing unencumbered data files would seem to be the best option.
In terms of a separate
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 08:02:44AM +, Tristan Greaves wrote:
> I'm taking a look at packaging the game Cluedome:
>
> http://www.cluedome.com/
>
> I'm wondering if there are any copyright concerns. The game advertises itself
> as a clone, and the source ships with an example game rules ru
Hi,
I'm taking a look at packaging the game Cluedome:
http://www.cluedome.com/
I'm wondering if there are any copyright concerns. The game advertises itself
as a clone, and the source ships with an example game rules rule and image --
which match that of the board came Clue/Cluedo.
Fo
27 matches
Mail list logo
