On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 06:09:01PM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got an issue with watch file usage in some software I'm trying to
> package ( https://mentors.debian.net/package/compton ).
>
> Upstream does not release tarballs, instead preferring packagers to
> build straight from g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've got an issue with watch file usage in some software I'm trying to
package ( https://mentors.debian.net/package/compton ).
Upstream does not release tarballs, instead preferring packagers to
build straight from git. I've followed the advice o
Your message dated Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:20:26 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: spout/1.4-1 [ITA] -- Tiny abstract black and
white 2D cave-shooter
has caused the Debian Bug report #701543,
regarding RFS: spout/1.4-1 [ITA] -- Tiny abstract black and white 2D
cave-shooter
to be ma
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phonetisaurus"
* Package name: phonetisaurus
Version : 0.7.8-2
Upstream Author : Josef Novak
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/phonetisaurus/
* License
* Giulio Paci , 2013-02-23, 19:37:
I just sent another email further explaining the issue and pointing out
it is a general issue.
Thanks.
I think this change
* Move plugins from /usr/lib/fst/ to /usr/lib/fst/1/.
warrants updating README.Debian.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "medit"
* Package name: medit
Version : 1.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Yevgen Muntyan
Daniel Poelzleithner
* URL : http://mooedit.sourceforge.net/
Hi,
On 02/25/2013 01:48 PM, Scott Leggett wrote:
> I used compat level 8 and Standards-Version 3.9.3 because these are
> the versions which dh_make automatically inserts when debianising an
> application. Thanks for the heads-up regarding the new versions - I've
> fixed the packaging.
>
> For fut
On 02/25/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> 6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format.
>
> Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a
> recommendation, not a rule. Thanks.
>
Hello,
ok, agree, my "typo". But I think it is desirable to ask for DEP-5 for
Hi,
On 02/25/2013 07:52 AM, Joachim Langenbach wrote:
>> 1) changelog says, that you are targeting the software to "stable"
>> release. It is impossible. Use "unstable" instead. Also you should put
>> your name there.
>
> So this stable or unstable line refers to the distribution status the pack
Hello,
> 6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format.
Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a
recommendation, not a rule. Thanks.
--
WBR, Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
2013/2/25 Joachim Langenbach :
> Without the dependencies to binary packages defined in this package (like
> dependency of libengsas0-common from libengsas0), right?
I think libengsas0-common should be kept.
Also, probably 0 should be removed from its name:
libengsas0-common -> libengsas-common
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/02/13 01:17, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> thanks for adopting the package. There are a couple of
> notes/questions:
Hi Anton, thanks for the review. As you can see, I'm quite new at this!
>
> 1. Why do you use compat level 8, not 9? 2
12 matches
Mail list logo
