Bug#823650: marked as done (RFS: gcc-6-doc/6.1.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2016 05:43:38 +0200 with message-id <20160507034338.ga28...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#823650: RFS: gcc-6-doc/6.1.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #823650, regarding RFS: gcc-6-doc/6.1.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#823650: RFS: gcc-6-doc/6.1.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 822667 by -1 Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package gcc-6-doc. (ITP: #822667) * Package name: gcc-6-doc Version : 6.1.0-1 Upstream Author : FSF * URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/ * License

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

Hi, I've split the caffe-cpu package and the caffe-cuda package, and I'd like to first handle the cpu version, leaving the CUDA version pending at debian/science/caffe-contrib. The updated cpu version has been uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/caffe This update involves

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Adam, >What's the problem? none, you are right! I read again your previous mail, and yes, there is no conflict assuming we use GPL2 only. I would appreciate however a new tarball, because I don't like having to tell ftpmasters where to look in the mail list for the license change.

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

Hi Balint, so I presume you want to set yourself as owner of this bug, right? thanks for your work! Gianfranco Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 23:40, Balint Reczey ha scritto: Control: reopen -1 Luckily the upload got rejected, thus I did not interfere with the RFS

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

Control: reopen -1 Luckily the upload got rejected, thus I did not interfere with the RFS process. Cheers, Balint On Fri, 6 May 2016 23:28:46 +0200 Balint Reczey wrote: > Hi Giulio and All, > > I'm sorry, but I have uploaded the package after a review but before > I

Bug#823521: marked as done (RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 23:28:46 +0200 with message-id <572d0c8e.5000...@balintreczey.hu> and subject line Re: Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit has caused the Debian Bug report #823521, regarding RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

Bug#823562: marked as done (RFS: zenburn-emacs/2.4-1 [ITP] -- low contrast color theme for Emacs)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 22:29:39 +0200 with message-id <20160506202939.GA30789@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#823562: RFS: zenburn-emacs/2.4-1 [ITP] -- low contrast color theme for Emacs has caused the Debian Bug report #823562, regarding RFS: zenburn-emacs/2.4-1 [ITP] -- low

Bug#823470: marked as done (RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 19:38:57 +0200 with message-id <572cd6b1.8050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#823470: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool has caused the Debian Bug report #823470, regarding RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme

Bug#822990: RFS: hashcat/2.00-1 [ITP]

Hi Mentors! 2016-04-29 12:57 GMT-05:00 Daniel Echeverry : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hashcat" > > * Package name: hashcat > * Version : 2.00-1 > * Upstream Author : Jens

Bug#823606: RFS: sphinxcontrib-doxylink [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sphinxcontrib-doxylink" * Package name: sphinxcontrib-doxylink Version : 1.3-1 Upstream Author : Matt Williams * URL :

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

On 06/05/2016 10:52, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 06/05/16 09:30, Giulio Paci wrote: >> Il 06/mag/2016 08:36, "Ghislain Vaillant" > > ha scritto: >> > You just need to join the team >> > on alioth, which will grant you access to the team's git

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:55:47AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > unfortunately I'm not sure this is enough for ftpmasters... > > I'm afraid we need an official tarball with the fixed licenses, otherwise > they won't be coherent license-wise. > > this seems to be a blocker for now.

Bug#823420: marked as done (Fwd: RFS: dmaths/3.5.9.8+dfsg1-1 (package already in Debian))

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 09:34:13 + (UTC) with message-id <116372347.411083.1462527253336.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#823420: Fwd: RFS: dmaths/3.5.9.8+dfsg1-1 (package already in Debian) has caused the Debian Bug report #823420, regarding Fwd: RFS:

Bug#823413: marked as done (RFS: arrayfire/3.3.2+dfsg1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 09:38:20 + (UTC) with message-id <141678666.386667.1462527500303.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#823413: RFS: arrayfire/3.3.2+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #823413, regarding RFS: arrayfire/3.3.2+dfsg1-1 to be marked as

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Alexander, unfortunately I'm not sure this is enough for ftpmasters... I'm afraid we need an official tarball with the fixed licenses, otherwise they won't be coherent license-wise. this seems to be a blocker for now. g. Il Lunedì 2 Maggio 2016 21:27, Alexander Koenig

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

On 06/05/16 09:30, Giulio Paci wrote: Il 06/mag/2016 08:36, "Ghislain Vaillant" > ha scritto: > You just need to join the team > on alioth, which will grant you access to the team's git repositories. If I remember correctly I am already part of

Bug#823575: RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC]

it might be because of different compression levels, not sure sorry :( (it happens to me too, don't worry!) Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 10:15, Ghislain Vaillant ha scritto: Weird, I just let `gbp buildpackage -nc -S -sa` do its magic and either build locally with sbuild or

Bug#823474: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.2-0.1~exp1

control: tags -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! Hi, it would be nice to avoid having a possible and problematic version even in experimental. Specially because it might be source of data-losses to the end users. BTW, please ask xnox to comaintain the package, if you really want to help in

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

Il 06/mag/2016 08:36, "Ghislain Vaillant" ha scritto: > > On 06/05/16 02:48, Giulio Paci wrote: >> >> On 05/05/2016 19:45, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >>> >>> On 05/05/16 17:16, Giulio Paci wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC:

Bug#823539: marked as done (RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.7-1 -- Emacs minor mode that reindents code after every change)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 08:17:36 + (UTC) with message-id <1597408377.314908.1462522656406.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#823539: RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.7-1 -- Emacs minor mode that reindents code after every change has caused the Debian Bug report

Bug#823576: marked as done (RFS: nfft/3.3.1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 08:09:37 + (UTC) with message-id <431576168.307152.1462522177759.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#823576: RFS: nfft/3.3.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #823576, regarding RFS: nfft/3.3.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#823575: RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC]

Weird, I just let `gbp buildpackage -nc -S -sa` do its magic and either build locally with sbuild or send to debomatic. No idea why I end up with a different orig tarball then, do you? Ghis On 06/05/16 09:08, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi, signed and uploaded, but different orig tarball is

Bug#823575: RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC]

Hi, signed and uploaded, but different orig tarball is *bad* cheers, G. Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 8:53, Ghislain Vaillant ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asl" * Package name: asl

Bug#823575: marked as done (RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC])

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 08:08:30 + (UTC) with message-id <1563003465.321147.1462522110405.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#823575: RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #823575, regarding RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#823576: RFS: nfft/3.3.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nfft" * Package name: nfft Version : 3.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Prof. Dr. Daniel Potts * URL

Bug#823575: RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asl" * Package name: asl Version : 0.1.6-2 Upstream Author : Avtech Scientific * URL : http://asl.org.il * License :

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

On 06/05/16 02:48, Giulio Paci wrote: On 05/05/2016 19:45, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: On 05/05/16 17:16, Giulio Paci wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: rbal...@debian.org Dear Balint, I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package "irstlm"