On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 14:18 +0800, Timothy Wu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems to me that every time I do some upgrade via apt-get, maybe it's
> kernel upgrades, my menu.lst entries changes from /dev/sda1 to /dev/hda1. As
> a result, the system don't find the disk. It occurs to me like three times
> al
Hi,
It seems to me that every time I do some upgrade via apt-get, maybe it's
kernel upgrades, my menu.lst entries changes from /dev/sda1 to /dev/hda1. As
a result, the system don't find the disk. It occurs to me like three times
already. Why does it keep on getting changed incorrectly? Is there an
>> Of course, a static IP would probably work as well, not by its nature
>> but because your ISP probably doesn't block port 80 for their static IPs
>> (since that would defeat the main purpose of having a static IP).
> Some ISPs only have a small surcharge for static IPs, but others only offer
> t
On 2009-07-30 21:43, Stefan Monnier wrote:
[snip]
Of course, a static IP would probably work as well, not by its nature
but because your ISP probably doesn't block port 80 for their static IPs
(since that would defeat the main purpose of having a static IP).
Some ISPs only have a small surchar
> Ok so here is the issue I have a desire to run my own linux server as an rt
> box and to do wiki web serving plus email.
This requires outside machines to be able to connect to your server on
port 80 by default. It's fairly common for ISPs to block port 80
specifically because they don't want y
ml ml wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> i need file version 5.x on my system. But Debian etch comes with file
> version 4.17.
> How do i install 5.x (from source) without messing up my system?
>
ETCH is old. Is upgrading to the latest stable version (LENNY) not an
option?
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanch
hadi motamedi wrote:
> Dear All
> Can you please let us know what is the required service that needs to be
> enabled on the Debian server to allow for Remote Desktop Connection opened
> from the MS Windows client's side ?
> Regards
> H.Motamedi
Install the openssh-server package on the Debian ser
Tim Beauregard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I recently re-subscribed having been off for about four years. The
> changes I have noticed are:
>
> 1. Much less traffic. I previously got 250+ posts per day. Now 50-100.
> Could this be due to the development of ub
Michael Pobega wrote:
> Mark, a GUI-less system is useless (unless it's some sort of server).
You are kidding, right?
It actually depends on what you are using it for. I use GUI-less systems all
the times for programming. They are as useful as a GUI system.
This is not to say that GUI is usele
On 2009-07-30 17:00, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Ron Johnson:
On 2009-07-30 14:08, Jochen Schulz wrote:
I haven't tried it yet, but I see no reason why that shouldn't work. The
DVD image is a regular ISO 9660, just as the CD images.
Linux uses the udf fs for DVD & BlueRay disks.
I expected that,
AG wrote:
> Hi
>
> Having recently upgraded to sid, I want to try to ensure that I am able
> to maintain a more or less stable system under those circumstances and
> in the full knowledge that, by definition, sid is unstable and may be
> subject to breakages.
>
> With this in mind, what do the m
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:54:55AM -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
> Steve Kleene writes:
>
> > Before I build a Lenny system on my 5-year-old PC, I want to replace the two
> > internal hard drives. I'm not too swift with hardware specs and want to
> > make
> > sure I get the right drives. I will p
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:01:48PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:14:55AM EDT, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:47:55PM -0400, Chris Jones
> > was heard to say:
>
> > (2) Since mutt runs its editor as an external program, there's no way
> > to
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:14:55AM EDT, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:47:55PM -0400, Chris Jones
> was heard to say:
[..]
> > The only thing I find "frustrating" about mutt is that it is impossible
> > to view more than one message at a time - you actually have to fire up a
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-07-30 23:41 +0200, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>
>> I just downloaded the source for Arora (a webkit-based browser)
>> because the version available to me through aptitude doesn't like my
>> ELF64 system. The source comes with a 'builddeb.s
Patrick Wiseman:
>
> I just downloaded the source for Arora (a webkit-based browser)
> because the version available to me through aptitude doesn't like my
> ELF64 system. The source comes with a 'builddeb.sh' script, but it
> fails with './builddeb.sh: line 4: debuild: command not found'.
> Obvi
Ron Johnson:
> On 2009-07-30 14:08, Jochen Schulz wrote:
>>
>> I haven't tried it yet, but I see no reason why that shouldn't work. The
>> DVD image is a regular ISO 9660, just as the CD images.
>
>
> Linux uses the udf fs for DVD & BlueRay disks.
>
I expected that, too, but:
$ file iso/debia
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:14:55 -0700
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> (3) mutt takes *ages* to load large folders, particularly if they're
> maildir based. ISTM that an on-disk index would be a sensible
> idea here.
set header_cache="~/.mutt/cache/"
I also recompile mutt using "--with-tokyo
On 2009-07-30 23:41 +0200, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> I just downloaded the source for Arora (a webkit-based browser)
> because the version available to me through aptitude doesn't like my
> ELF64 system. The source comes with a 'builddeb.sh' script, but it
> fails with './builddeb.sh: line 4: debu
On 2009-07-30 16:41, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
Hi:
I just downloaded the source for Arora (a webkit-based browser)
because the version available to me through aptitude doesn't like my
ELF64 system. The source comes with a 'builddeb.sh' script, but it
fails with './builddeb.sh: line 4: debuild: com
Hi:
I just downloaded the source for Arora (a webkit-based browser)
because the version available to me through aptitude doesn't like my
ELF64 system. The source comes with a 'builddeb.sh' script, but it
fails with './builddeb.sh: line 4: debuild: command not found'.
Obviously I'm missing somethi
On 2009-07-30 14:08, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Mark:
Has anyone had success using the method described here
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch04s03.html.en (Section 4.3.2)
using a DVD .iso image?
I haven't tried it yet, but I see no reason why that shouldn't work. The
DVD image is a regu
On 2009-07-30 15:35, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:54:33 -0500
Ron Johnson wrote:
GNOME really is too bulky and pretty dumbed-down, but they've done
IMNSHO a good job of making an easily-configured panel and a
"smooth" system that lets me customize it enough so that what I nee
I've used unetbootin for a friend's Ubuntu installation (worked very well)
and tried it with Lenny stable but it didn't work. The second link you
provided indicates it is available for squeeze and sid but not Lenny so I
assume that's why it doesn't work with the current Lenny stable.
Luckily the
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:54:33 -0500
Ron Johnson wrote:
> GNOME really is too bulky and pretty dumbed-down, but they've done
> IMNSHO a good job of making an easily-configured panel and a
> "smooth" system that lets me customize it enough so that what I need
> is there, in colors and icon style
Mark wrote:
> Thanks J. Found an 8 GB drive for $16 so I'm moving forward with this,
> I figure it's worth a try.
>
Just curious but have you tried UNetbootin?
http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/
it's also available in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=all&keywords=unetbootin
--
On 2009-07-30 21:49 +0200, Kushal Koolwal wrote:
>>You should rm -rf /dev/.udev/, but it is better to leave the rest of
>>/dev alone.Sven, I did rm -rf /dev/.udev/ and when I restarted my system I
>>again
> got the warning message and /dev/.udev was created again automatically.
You will need to
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:59:00 -0500
Neal Hogan wrote:
> > In the 3+ years I've been with Debian I've seen *great*
> > improvements in user-friendliness.
>
> I wonder what "user-friendliness" means, sometimes.
Well, in this particular case I tried to say: the Debian *operating
system* has become
Thanks J. Found an 8 GB drive for $16 so I'm moving forward with this, I
figure it's worth a try.
Mark
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Mark:
> >
> > Has anyone had success using the method described here
> > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch04s03.html.en (S
>You should rm -rf /dev/.udev/, but it is better to leave the rest of
>/dev alone.Sven, I did rm -rf /dev/.udev/ and when I restarted my system I
>again
got the warning message and /dev/.udev was created again automatically.
Also I checked on another system which does not give this message and
SO I have a debootrap Debian 5.0 (i386) on /home/kushalk/debianTest
I chroot into it by:
#chroot /home/kushalk/debianTest
and then mount the /proc by:
#mount -t proc proc /proc
Now when I run:
#apt-get update
#apt-get upgrade
I always noticed that whenever a kernel tries to get upgraded,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Tim Tebbit wrote:
> you should mount ext4dev filesystems using -o nodelalloc and only use
> freshly created filesystems using "mke2fs -t ext4dev
Fortunately, the OP was doing exactly this.
mrc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Mark:
>
> Has anyone had success using the method described here
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch04s03.html.en (Section 4.3.2)
> using a DVD .iso image?
I haven't tried it yet, but I see no reason why that shouldn't work. The
DVD image is a regular ISO 9660, just as the CD images.
On 2009-07-30 18:53 +0200, Kushal Koolwal wrote:
>>Assuming Kushal uses an initramfs, without it the boot process will
>> halt rather early if the kernel cannot find /dev/console.
> Actually I am not using initramfs. Would leaving /dev/console and deleting
> everything under /dev/.udev/ work?
Yo
Has anyone had success using the method described here
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch04s03.html.en (Section 4.3.2)
using a DVD .iso image? The manual lists CD image but not DVD (Section
4.3.2.2), maybe I'm over analyzing it. I'm debating purchasing a new 8 GB
or greater usb memory
Mike Castle wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote:
mount -t ext4 -o nodelalloc /dev/sdc1 /s3
Leave off the -t ext4 and it should mount, though as ext4dev. Or use
-t ext4dev.
There are some known bugs with the kernel you're using, hence all of
the recommendations for new
>Assuming Kushal uses an initramfs, without it the boot process will
> halt rather early if the kernel cannot find /dev/console.
Actually I am not using initramfs. Would leaving /dev/console and deleting
everything under /dev/.udev/ work?
Kushal Koolwal
I do blog at http://blogs.koolwal.net/
Is there a particular brand of router?
Is the multi-tiered switch configuration preventing this?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Paul Scott wrote:
> John Haggerty wrote:
>
>> I would ask would a static ip really be able to allow the machines to
>> reach the outer network?
>>
>
> Why not? As l
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-07-30 10:17, Mark Allums wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-07-30 10:02, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
Second, you need a userland that knows what to do with ext4---this
is very important.
Do you mean e2fsprogs?
As a start, yes.
What else, then? Is up-to-date Sid
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote:
>
> mount -t ext4 -o nodelalloc /dev/sdc1 /s3
Leave off the -t ext4 and it should mount, though as ext4dev. Or use
-t ext4dev.
There are some known bugs with the kernel you're using, hence all of
the recommendations for newer kernels (that al
On 2009-07-30 10:17, Mark Allums wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-07-30 10:02, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
Second, you need a userland that knows what to do with ext4---this
is very important.
Do you mean e2fsprogs?
As a start, yes.
What else, then? Is up-to-date Sid hiding something fr
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:47:55PM -0400, Chris Jones was
heard to say:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:20:00AM EDT, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > On 2009-07-28 13:09, Mark wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > >> When I feel adventurous one weekend I'll try a Debi
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-07-30 10:02, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
Second, you need a userland that knows what to do with ext4---this is
very important.
Do you mean e2fsprogs?
As a start, yes.
MArk Allums
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 2009-07-30 10:02, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
Second, you need a userland that knows what to do with
ext4---this is very important.
Do you mean e2fsprogs?
--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Rick Pasotto wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 05:16:34PM -0400, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
As far as I know 2.6.27 included stable ext4 support.
Is there a debian package? 'apt-cache policy linux-image-686' shows only
2.6.30 in unstable and 2.6.26+17+lenny1 in testing.
You need a recent kernel,
On 26.06.09 10:35, Jesus arteche wrote:
> I'm working with proftpd, it works right, the users make login and access to
> the directories with the right permmission, but when they access to their
> directoris they can also see the others directories from other users. How
> can i do to make them just
Hi,
On Thursday 30 July 2009 12:24:46 Javier Barroso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:38 AM, wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Can't run xend in debian squeeze.
> >
> > Install packages:
> > linux-image-xen-amd64
> > xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64
> >
> which xen-utils version?
Latest from squeeze re
John Haggerty wrote:
I would ask would a static ip really be able to allow the machines to
reach the outer network?
Why not? As long as the outer fixed IP is routable which it would be.
OTOH dyndns.org and others provide a way to tell the outside world what
your current IP is. These service
This is in testing (currently squeeze, I believe).
I log in using gdm. My default window manager is icewm.
I click on the little square icon on the bar at the bottom (the one that
says "XTerm" in a white box when I hover the nouse over it), and nothing
happens.
I do this repeatedly, and still
>>
>> I run off of a qwest dsl setup that is feeding 4 computers
>>
> I would ask would a static ip really be able to allow
> the machines to reach the outer network ?
John
In all honesty, I don't know as I haven't tried outside connections
through my qwest dsl with a static
> Useful links for getting rid of U3...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U3
>
> http://www.u3.com/uninstall/final.aspx
The second is a 404. Turns out my mp3 player is not U3, it's mounted
as a normal vfat. It just happens to have model #YP-U3ZB and acts as
regular mass storage, not like what's des
Dave Witbrodt writes:
> Does the new 'ia32-apt-get' system honor anything in /etc/apt after
> initially being installed, such as 'apt.conf'? Or should 'apt.conf'
> be copied to '/etc/ia32-apt'?
>
>
> Dave W.
It does honor it. It actualy comes with
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00ia32-apt-get too.
MfG
On 2009-07-30 12:21 +0200, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
> Kushal Koolwal wrote:
>> Recently I was having some trouble with my udev, so I purged udev, rebooted
>> system and re-install udev again. After that most of the udev startup error
>> went away but now I get the following warning message during s
Kushal Koolwal wrote:
> Recently I was having some trouble with my udev, so I purged udev, rebooted
> system and re-install udev again. After that most of the udev startup error
> went away but now I get the following warning message during system boot:
>
> .udev/ already exists on the static /de
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:38 AM, wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Can't run xend in debian squeeze.
>
> Install packages:
> linux-image-xen-amd64
> xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64
>
which xen-utils version?
> And reboot using:
>
> title Xen 3.2-1-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64
> root (hd0,0)
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:50:08PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
Hi,
I have a new install of sid on a laptop with a new hard drive. The
wireless works fine except at one location where my guess is that the
DNS is not set up correctly. I work around this by adding useabl
On 29 Jul 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-07-29 12:19, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> >On 29 Jul 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>On 2009-07-29 02:36, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> >[snip]
> >>>Incidentally, the same comments apply to mutt. What's wrong with it?
> >>Nothing's *wrong* with it. Except that "o
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Girish Kulkarni wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
>>
>> ... I think Mark has hit the proverbial nail-on-the-head ...
>
> Yes, with a top-posted HTML message, sent using Gmail. :-)
okay . . . maybe he bent the nail a bit. At least it was on the head.
58 matches
Mail list logo
