Re: Vim config problem in jessie

2014-02-15 Thread rpr nospam
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 04:05:48 + (UTC), Frank Mile wrote: > > I should have added one more interesting detail. If I comment out the > (python) plugin call in /etc/vim/vimrc: > if has("autocmd") > filetype plugin indent on > endif > > then the tabstops work without the manual over

Re: apt-get remove/purge with regex gives unexpected result

2014-02-13 Thread rpr nospam
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:04:49 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote: > > My interpretation of that paragraph is that apt-get first tries to > interpret the pattern as a wildcard (see glob(7)) and only tries a > regular expression match if the glob produces no matches. Sven, it seems you are right. I tried the f

apt-get remove/purge with regex gives unexpected result

2014-02-12 Thread rpr nospam
On an installation of Debian GNU/Linux 7.0 with subsequent updates from testing (Linux 3.12.9-1 amd64) I noticed a strange output while running "apt-get remove" or "apt-get purge" in order to remove/purge libreoffice packages. Here are the libreoffice packages: $ dpkg-query -l 'libreoffice*' | ta

worthwhile spam [paris hilton video]

2003-11-12 Thread tb . 31112 . nospam
http://66.221.38.222/pudtv/girls/paris.wmv trust me, it's worth it -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A newbie's confusion about GPL

2003-10-20 Thread tb . 31020 . nospam
I'd like to stop this discussion :-) you get in one more good reply and then I'm dropping it > Then does that give people in Afghanistan and Iraq the right to attack > America? As it does seem that (some) Americans want to kill them. I said "we only want to kill them because they want to kill us"

Re: Holy Spam!

2003-10-03 Thread NOSPAM
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:13:28PM -0400, Jon Earle wrote: > I sent _one_ post to the debian-users list yesterday. One. I neglected > to use an alias I'd created for posting to that list, and, due to their > open posting policy and their email-usenet gateway and the availability of > addresses i

Re: Cron

2003-09-27 Thread tb . nospam
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:47:07PM +0200, Stefan Waidele jun. wrote: > Howell Evans wrote: > >You can not make cron more granuler(sp?) then ever 5 mins. > > Quote from 'man cron': > "cron then wakes up every minute, examining all stored crontabs, check- > ing each command to see if it shoul

snapshot.debian.net

2003-09-26 Thread tb . nospam
Does http://snapshot.debian.net really keep EVERY version of EVERY package in unstable? I've been doing this myself; on the rare instances when something blows up it's been great; but if anything is missing, Murphy's law comes into play... -Tom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Re: Anti-Spam ideas for usenet/list harvested email addresses

2003-09-26 Thread tb . nospam
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:18:51PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 04:05:39PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 01:40:27AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > Wow, way too easy. It should require you to type something long and > > > case sensitive. You know, somet

Re: SU shows my password at terminal

2003-09-25 Thread tb . nospam
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 02:43:01PM -0700, Dave Carrigan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 01:39:03PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Sometimes, when I type SU and then start typing my password really fast, > > a few of the keystrokes will be echod to the screen -- usually when the > > syste

SU shows my password at terminal

2003-09-25 Thread tb . nospam
Sometimes, when I type SU and then start typing my password really fast, a few of the keystrokes will be echod to the screen -- usually when the system is only under moderate load and I'm not "expecting" it to be slow. It happens in X with gnome-terminal and also sometimes just at the console.

Re: fonts in openoffice.org

2003-09-24 Thread tb . nospam
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:25:18PM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I am running unstable and apt-getted openoffice.org a couple of days > ago. The fonts in openoffice are awful - both the actual application and > fonts used when writing documents. My gnome desktop has really nice > anti

Re: Is "Motion" being actively maintained?

2003-09-23 Thread tb . nospam
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:55:39PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote: > On Tuesday September 23 at 06:37pm > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > You can stop flaming me now. > > I'm not flaming anyone, I'm trying to fix the signal/noise ratio by > directing your question to the proper place. I'm sorry I didn

Re: Is "Motion" being actively maintained?

2003-09-23 Thread tb . nospam
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:19:54PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote: > On Tuesday September 23 at 06:13pm > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I don't think I clearly stated my question: > > > > Why is Debian packaging 3.0.4 when 3.0.6 has been out for a long time? > > > > Purely a Debian question... > >

Re: Is "Motion" being actively maintained?

2003-09-23 Thread tb . nospam
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:13:28PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:35:21PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote: > > On Tuesday September 23 at 03:09pm > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > The latest stable release of Motion (http://motion.sf.net) is 3.0.6. > > > The packaged

Re: Is "Motion" being actively maintained?

2003-09-23 Thread tb . nospam
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:35:21PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote: > On Tuesday September 23 at 03:09pm > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The latest stable release of Motion (http://motion.sf.net) is 3.0.6. > > The packaged version in unstable is 3.0.4. I compiled 3.0.6 manually, > > > > necessary to

Is "Motion" being actively maintained?

2003-09-23 Thread tb . nospam
The latest stable release of Motion (http://motion.sf.net) is 3.0.6. The packaged version in unstable is 3.0.4. I compiled 3.0.6 manually, necessary to work with the latest ov511 drivers. I filed a wish about it; most of the bugs are >1 or 2 years old (most are marked as Fixed in NMU). What's

Re: OT: RH and Debian brothers now?

2003-09-23 Thread tb . nospam
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:55:47PM -0400, Alfredo Valles wrote: > Hi all. > > Seems to me that for the first time debian is going to have real competition > in its own field. > Red Hat announced that they will join with fedora community and produce the > Red Hat Linux Project. So they will have

Re: Procmailrc to play sound async when message arrives

2003-09-23 Thread tb . nospam
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:53:36AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote: > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:16:51 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:06:49AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:45:42 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > if I fork bplay several ti

Re: Procmailrc to play sound async when message arrives

2003-09-23 Thread tb . nospam
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:06:49AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote: > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:45:42 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > if I fork bplay several times, it doesn't "mix" the sounds: they > > still play out synchronously, even though the caller isn't blocked. > > > > Is there a sound ut

Re: Procmailrc to play sound async when message arrives

2003-09-23 Thread tb . nospam
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:22:28AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > so unless anybody has a better already written sound buffer mixer to > > recommend, consider this matter closed. > > > > Thanks for your attention. > > -T > > > I had a

Re: Procmailrc to play sound async when message arrives

2003-09-22 Thread tb . nospam
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:45:42PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:15:40PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote: > > There's probably an easier way than this, but you could use perl to fork() > > the bplay processes, so they don't block. > > > > Okay, I realized I could just ca

Re: Procmailrc to play sound async when message arrives

2003-09-22 Thread tb . nospam
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:15:40PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote: > There's probably an easier way than this, but you could use perl to fork() > the bplay processes, so they don't block. > Okay, I realized I could just call a bash script that ends in & to play the sounds async to procmail, that's h

Procmailrc to play sound async when message arrives

2003-09-22 Thread tb . nospam
I'm a procmail newb. I've written a recipie to play a WAV when a message arrives. It works, it sounds nice, but it's synchronous: :0 c * ^X-Mailing-List:.*lists.debian.org* | /usr/bin/bplay /x/x/click_x.wav Since this WAV takes ~1 sec to play, procmail blocks 1 sec per message. It ends up ta

Re: Divx and DVD playback

2003-09-21 Thread tb . nospam
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:10:14PM -0400, Gerard Ceraso wrote: > -Original Message- > From: AnotherLinuxGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 7:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Divx and DVD playback > > > what is the best of the best when it comes to a

Re: getting rid of debian gnome

2003-09-21 Thread tb . nospam
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:25:56PM -0400, Geordie Birch wrote: > Cheryl Homiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21 Sep 2003 12:09 -0500]: > > Is there any clean way to get rid of gnome. When I did > > "apt-get install gnome) > > it installed a whole bunch of packages. > > but when I did > > apt-get remove gnom

Re: DnsMasq: Happy Happy Joy Joy

2003-09-20 Thread tb . nospam
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:27:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The docs aren't very prescriptive and the new versign-blocker isn't > > documented at all, so here's what I did. > > > > 1. If you're running Woody or Sid, you'll have dhcp-client. DnsMasq recommends > > res

Re: DVDRW: Please help!

2003-09-20 Thread tb . nospam
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 11:20:03AM -0400, Jeff Elkins wrote: > On Saturday 20 September 2003 2:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> Why not try: "dvd+rw-tools" (debian packaged, reportedly has > >> better support for +RW than even cdrecord-prodvd)? > > > >I use cdrecord-prodvd. > >It's definitel

Re: DVDRW: Please help!

2003-09-19 Thread tb . nospam
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:44:56AM +0800, csj wrote: > At Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:58:37 -0400, > Jeff Elkins wrote: > > > > OK, I'm bummed. > > [...] > > > DVD-RW (don't have any DVD-R's) seems to work fine under > > linux. However, DVD +RW/DVD+R discs produce a coaster every > > time. However, both

Re: DnsMasq: Happy Happy Joy Joy

2003-09-19 Thread tb . nospam
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:57:45PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:40:01PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The other day I wished for a patched DnsMasq to block Verisign. > > Pleased to say it works! > > > 3. Then I patched /etc/dnsmasq.conf: > > --- dnsmasq.conf.orig 2

DnsMasq: Happy Happy Joy Joy

2003-09-18 Thread tb . nospam
The other day I wished for a patched DnsMasq to block Verisign. Pleased to say it works! The docs aren't very prescriptive and the new versign-blocker isn't documented at all, so here's what I did. 1. If you're running Woody or Sid, you'll have dhcp-client. DnsMasq recommends resolvconf, and dhc

Re: Moz & Firebird

2003-09-18 Thread tb . nospam
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:42:35PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt wrote: > tvn said: > > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:15:08 +0700 > > Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Have you stumbled upon the text fields that wouldn't accept any input? > >> (ie: no keystroke accepted, but the mouse works). > >> It happens

Re: Equation system resolver

2003-09-17 Thread tb . nospam
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:48:58PM -0400, Nicolas wrote: > Is there a equation system resolver in debian or linux in general? > Basicly, I need to resolv equation systems or simplify very long and > complicated equations. > > Nic Cola > -- > QOTD: > Sacred cows make great hamburgers.

Re: Verisign and spam blocking

2003-09-17 Thread tb . nospam
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 11:30:28AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > To follow up on this, thanks to the quick work of Lamont Jones, Debian > unstable will, in about 15 minutes, include a bind patched as follows: > [snip] I haven't been running a local DNS, I get my IP & DNS settings from DNS from my ISP.

Re: directfb w ATI Radeon

2003-09-15 Thread tb . nospam
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 02:11:03PM -0400, Mental Patient wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:39:01AM -0400, Mental Patient wrote: > > > >Is the framebuffer accelerated with a Radeon [9700]? I got it to work > >but it was very slow compared to not using it. This would m

Re: directfb w ATI Radeon

2003-09-15 Thread tb . nospam
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:39:01AM -0400, Mental Patient wrote: > Arnt Karlsen wrote: > >On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 00:31:55 -0400, > >Mental Patient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > >>Anyone using this setup? I recently switched my Geforce3 for a Radeon. > >>I have