On 2017-03-03, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>> I also hit (and mentioned in a previous post) the 130% limit. I got
>> there by going to TOOLS/OPTIONS/VIEW/SCALING. What effect did your font
>> manipulation have on the HELP files (because that's what we're talking
>> about here, actually).
>
> Hmmm, I just
Curt writes:
> On 2017-03-03, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>
>> I will top-post as it is meaningless to comment specifically.
>> I do have 5 and have not used base since I don't know when, on this
>> installation it was firsts. I am made fun of having large fonts as I
>> refuse to wear glasses and my eye
On 03/03/2017 04:15 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 08:45:00AM +, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
I will top-post as it is meaningless to comment specifically.
I do have 5 and have not used base since I don't know when, on this
installat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 08:45:00AM +, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> I will top-post as it is meaningless to comment specifically.
>
> I do have 5 and have not used base since I don't know when, on this
> installation it was firsts. I am made fun of having
On 2017-03-03, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> I will top-post as it is meaningless to comment specifically.
> I do have 5 and have not used base since I don't know when, on this
> installation it was firsts. I am made fun of having large fonts as I
> refuse to wear glasses and my eyes get irritated trying
I will top-post as it is meaningless to comment specifically.
I do have 5 and have not used base since I don't know when, on this
installation it was firsts. I am made fun of having large fonts as I
refuse to wear glasses and my eyes get irritated trying to read small
print. I adjusted the menus,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:53:58AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 08:19 AM, Bob Weber wrote:
> >Unacceptable. It affects the size of _everything_, not just font size.
> >>I collided with with a fatal side-effect. I tried a too large facto
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:41:14 -0600
Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>
> That triggers another question to be investigated.
> I'm using LO 4.3.3.2 on Jessie(8.6.0)/MATE .
> I do not have the bandwidth to do a Netinstall.
> Would any bug I file get anything but "won't fix" since I'm so out of
> date?
>
>
On 03/01/2017 09:00 AM, Joe wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:48:37 -0600
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 03/01/2017 06:37 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:33:58AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
How do you increase fontsize on th
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:48:37 -0600
Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 06:37 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:33:58AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> How do you increase fontsize on the Lib
On 03/01/2017 08:19 AM, Bob Weber wrote:
Unacceptable. It affects the size of _everything_, not just font size.
I collided with with a fatal side-effect. I tried a too large factor.
Now the "accept" button is now off screen and *NOT* accessible.
Don't see any option short of reinstall to resolve
-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A minimal relational database in Debian
Resent-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:49:24 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On 03/01/2017 06:37 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:33:58AM
Unacceptable. It affects the size of _everything_, not just font size.
> I collided with with a fatal side-effect. I tried a too large factor.
> Now the "accept" button is now off screen and *NOT* accessible.
> Don't see any option short of reinstall to resolve.
> I consider LibreOffice *DOA*
>
Try
> I'm not sure it's a "bug" in the "bug report" sense.
Sure looks like a bug to me (not being able to access the accept button
looks like a window manager bug, OTOH. At least with the
window-manager I use (ctwm), I have it configured such that I can move
a window from anywhere to anywhere by grab
Richard writes:
> I'm not sure it's a "bug" in the "bug report" sense.
Wishlist bugs are generally welcome.
> Even retired, there are just so many hours in a day ;/
The lst of projects grows to overflow the available time, doesn't it?
And I'm not even fully retired.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:48:37AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 06:37 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> >How about filing a bug report? That won't solve your problem
> >*right now*, but... you know, giving back and that.
> I'm not
On 03/01/2017 06:37 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:33:58AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
How do you increase fontsize on the LibeOffice (writer) toolbar and dropdown
meuns?? [closed] - Ask LibreOffice
https://ask.libre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:33:58AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> >How do you increase fontsize on the LibeOffice (writer) toolbar and dropdown
> >meuns?? [closed] - Ask LibreOffice
> >https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/31736/how-do-you-in
On 03/01/2017 02:02 AM, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote on 03/01/17 00:45:
On 02/28/2017 05:06 PM, Dominic Knight wrote:
On Monday 27 February 2017 13:17:56 Richard Owlett wrote:
I looked at at LibreOffice Base. It was unusable as its "help" system
provided no intrinsic way to in
Could you please change the Subject going forward?
--
Jonathan Dowland
Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2017-03-01, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>
> For me this works:
> Go to Tools > Options. Under LibreOffice, select View. Then find the Scaling
> option under User Interface. The default value is 100%. Increase this number
> until the font size is functional for you.
This worked for me; however, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:30:00AM +, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> Boy Microsoft10 and Office-Access and share all your data with the
> seattle bureau in a cloud and have no annoyance what so ever.
Veering dangerously off-topic. But my $EMPLOYER just did
Boy Microsoft10 and Office-Access and share all your data with the
seattle bureau in a cloud and have no annoyance what so ever.
Then pull the ethernet cable and see if your "purchased product" is
still functional.
Katrinity
Richard Owlett:
> On 02/28/2017 05:06 PM, Dominic Knight wrote:
>> On Mo
Richard Owlett wrote on 03/01/17 00:45:
> On 02/28/2017 05:06 PM, Dominic Knight wrote:
>> On Monday 27 February 2017 13:17:56 Richard Owlett wrote:
>>> I looked at at LibreOffice Base. It was unusable as its "help" system
>>> provided no intrinsic way to increase fonts to a legible size.
>>
>> Wou
On 02/28/2017 05:06 PM, Dominic Knight wrote:
On Monday 27 February 2017 13:17:56 Richard Owlett wrote:
I looked at at LibreOffice Base. It was unusable as its "help" system
provided no intrinsic way to increase fonts to a legible size.
Would temporarily changing your dpi settings work, the he
On Monday 27 February 2017 13:17:56 Richard Owlett wrote:
> I looked at at LibreOffice Base. It was unusable as its "help" system
> provided no intrinsic way to increase fonts to a legible size.
Would temporarily changing your dpi settings work, the help is
perfectly legible here, but I have incre
Richard Owlett writes:
> >
> >> A little research indicates that Tcl/Tk plays well with sqlite. A
> >> couple of years ago I started learning it for a now abandoned
> >> project. I'll follow up on that combo.
> >
> > Funny that you mention that: Sqlite's main author, D. Richard Hipp
> > has been al
On 02/27/2017 06:06 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
On 28/02/17 02:17, Richard Owlett wrote:
The last time I needed a relational database my employer was using
dBaseII on a MS-DOS machine.
What is a functional equivalent in the Debian repository?
I looked at at LibreOffice Base. It was unusable as
On 02/27/2017 02:46 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:46:16AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
A little research indicates that Tcl/Tk plays well with sqlite. A
couple of years ago I started learning it for a now abandoned
p
On Monday 27 February 2017 19:59:17 sunrise wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:46:16 -0600
>
> Richard Owlett wrote:
> >On 02/27/2017 09:44 AM, Joe wrote:
> >> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:53:30 -0600
> >>
> >> Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>> On 02/27/2017 07:43 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> LibreOffice
On Monday 27 February 2017 13:17:56 Richard Owlett wrote:
> I looked at at LibreOffice Base. It was unusable as its "help" system
> provided no intrinsic way to increase fonts to a legible size.
You prompted me to look. As you say, it is unusable and ctrl-+ has no effect
at all. It is clearly i
On Monday 27 February 2017 13:28:44 Christian Seiler wrote:
> often [Ctrl] + [+] will help
> increase font sizes.
Not in this case.
Lisi
On 28/02/17 02:17, Richard Owlett wrote:
The last time I needed a relational database my employer was using
dBaseII on a MS-DOS machine.
What is a functional equivalent in the Debian repository?
I looked at at LibreOffice Base. It was unusable as its "help" system
provided no intrinsic way to inc
Copied from a friend that dealt with such antiquities
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:46:16 -0600
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>> On 02/27/2017 09:44 AM, Joe wrote:
>>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:53:30 -0600
>>> Richard Owlett wrote:
On 02/27/2017 07:43 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> LibreOffice Base is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:46:16AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> A little research indicates that Tcl/Tk plays well with sqlite. A
> couple of years ago I started learning it for a now abandoned
> project. I'll follow up on that combo.
Funny
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:46:16 -0600
Richard Owlett wrote:
>On 02/27/2017 09:44 AM, Joe wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:53:30 -0600
>> Richard Owlett wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/27/2017 07:43 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>>>
LibreOffice Base is, AFAIK *not* a relational database, but just
>>>
Richard Owlett wrote:
> The last time I needed a relational database my employer was using
> dBaseII on a MS-DOS machine.
> What is a functional equivalent in the Debian repository?
no idea. i've used about a dozen different ones over
the years and even written parts of one.
my guess is th
That is an accessibility bug and ought to be reported as such and cargon
copied to debian-accessibility.
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Richard Owlett wrote:
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:17:56
From: Richard Owlett
To: debian-user
Subject: A minimal relational database in Debian?
Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Feb
On 02/27/2017 09:44 AM, Joe wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:53:30 -0600
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 02/27/2017 07:43 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
LibreOffice Base is, AFAIK *not* a relational database, but just
a -possibly graphical- user interface to one. Relational databases,
as I know them, ha
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:53:30 -0600
Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 02/27/2017 07:43 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> >
> > LibreOffice Base is, AFAIK *not* a relational database, but just
> > a -possibly graphical- user interface to one. Relational databases,
> > as I know them, have no "fonts", for ex
On 02/27/2017 07:43 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 07:17:56AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
The last time I needed a relational database my employer was using
dBaseII on a MS-DOS machine.
An IBM PC-XT IIRC
Hm. A strange "rel
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 02:28:44PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 02/27/2017 02:17 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > The last time I needed a relational database my employer was using
> > dBaseII on a MS-DOS machine. What is a functional equivalent in the
> > Debian repository?
>
> Well, I've nev
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 02:28:44PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Well, I've never used DBaseII, but if you want a small relational
> database, take a look at SQLite. There are bindings into most
> languages and there's a command line client. The storage is simple
> (from an end-user perspective)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 07:17:56AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> The last time I needed a relational database my employer was using
> dBaseII on a MS-DOS machine.
Hm. A strange "relational" database indeed...
> What is a functional equivalent in the
+1 for Sqlite unless you need multiuser access.
James
On 27 February 2017 at 13:17, Richard Owlett wrote:
> The last time I needed a relational database my employer was using dBaseII
> on a MS-DOS machine.
> What is a functional equivalent in the Debian repository?
>
> I looked at at LibreOffice
On 02/27/2017 02:17 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> The last time I needed a relational database my employer was using
> dBaseII on a MS-DOS machine. What is a functional equivalent in the
> Debian repository?
Well, I've never used DBaseII, but if you want a small relational
database, take a look at S
The last time I needed a relational database my employer was using
dBaseII on a MS-DOS machine.
What is a functional equivalent in the Debian repository?
I looked at at LibreOffice Base. It was unusable as its "help" system
provided no intrinsic way to increase fonts to a legible size.
https:
47 matches
Mail list logo