On 03/24/2008 03:53 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I apologize for taking so long to get back to you.
No Problem :-)
> I asked whether you were running etch because the unstable/testing
> version of mediawiki doesn't have dependencies that would pull in the
> stuff you're talking about. I've ta
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:38:36PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> I have here VDS with minimal Debian installation. Why Debian wish to
> install me Firefox, Gnome/GTK+ components, X11 components, Latex, Sound
> server, portmap, quite enough libraries etc.
I ap
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:45:29PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> On 03/23/2008 08:49 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > It is usual for upstream developers not to support the debian packages.
> > If you have troubles you should contact the maintainer/file a bug.
>
> Generally or for web applicat
On 03/23/2008 08:49 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> It is usual for upstream developers not to support the debian packages.
> If you have troubles you should contact the maintainer/file a bug.
Generally or for web applications? Why?
cheers
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 02:28:40PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> On 03/21/2008 09:20 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > I don't think so. Run 'aptitude keep-all', 'aptitude update' and retry.
> > Do you get the same thing? I'm guessing you tried to install some task
> > and aptitude still remembe
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 02:33:49PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> I posted the same topic on Mediawiki admins mailinglist. A Mediawiki
> developer[0] told that the Debian package is unsupported third-party and
> they receive a lot of complaints about it.
It is usual for upstream developers not
I posted the same topic on Mediawiki admins mailinglist. A Mediawiki
developer[0] told that the Debian package is unsupported third-party and
they receive a lot of complaints about it.
So will install myself. The only downside that I need to care myself
about security patches.
cheers
Simon
[0] h
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 02:28:40PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> On 03/21/2008 09:20 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > I don't think so. Run 'aptitude keep-all', 'aptitude update' and retry.
> > Do you get the same thing? I'm guessing you tried to install some task
> > and aptitude still remembe
On 03/21/2008 09:20 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> I don't think so. Run 'aptitude keep-all', 'aptitude update' and retry.
> Do you get the same thing? I'm guessing you tried to install some task
> and aptitude still remembers it.
Hi Andrei
No success.
Need to get 257MB/262MB of archives. After u
On 03/21/2008 10:20 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Which version of Debian are you running? etch?
Yes I am running Etch.
> What do you get if you add "-D" to the aptitude install line?
Sorry for such a long Copypasta.
# aptitude -D install mediawiki mediawiki-extensions
Reading package lists.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:38:36PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> I have here VDS with minimal Debian installation. Why Debian wish to
> install me Firefox, Gnome/GTK+ components, X11 components, Latex, Sound
> server, portmap, quite enough libraries etc.
Whic
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:38:36PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> Hi Debian users
>
> I have here VDS with minimal Debian installation. Why Debian wish to
> install me Firefox, Gnome/GTK+ components, X11 components, Latex, Sound
> server, portmap, quite enough libraries etc.
>
> Does MediaWik
Hi Debian users
I have here VDS with minimal Debian installation. Why Debian wish to
install me Firefox, Gnome/GTK+ components, X11 components, Latex, Sound
server, portmap, quite enough libraries etc.
Does MediaWiki really have that much dependencies?
Do I really need 671 MB wasted diskspace fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
