On Wed, Mar 18 2009, Joseph Nahmias wrote:
> 1 - What is an appropriate reserve level for the project?
>
> 2 - How should funds above that level be allocated?
3 - Should these decisions be made by the DPL acting alone, or
should that be left to the project membership deci
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:50:45AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I respectfully submit this general resolution proposal to your consideration.
Please make clear what is part of the proposal and what is not.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debi
> Of course, had the FTP master rejected packages under the AGPL from the
> archive, I would not have bothered with a GR. However I would like this
> GR to be considered independently of the FTP master resolution. They are
> not the target, the AGPL is.
It is not seperate. You do want to override
Bill Allombert writes:
> I proposed my resolution explicitly under 4.1.5, not under 4.1.3. The
> purpose of this GR is to take a public stance whether or not the AGPL
> meet DFSG.
>
> I am pretty confident that the FTP master will comply with the outcome
> of such determination, and I think it w
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 07:32:48PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bill, could you please change the GR to explicitly say that it's
> overriding a delegate decision so that it's clear in its implications and
> motivation?
I proposed my resolution explicitly under 4.1.5, not under 4.1.3.
The purpose o
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:19:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I like a lot Stefano's statement about collaborative maintainance:
> "Collaborative maintenance should not be mandatory (we do have
> several very efficient one-man-band developers), but should be our
> default".
>
> First of all, I
6 matches
Mail list logo
