Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Release:10.04
gdm:
Installed: 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3
Candidate: 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3
Version table:
*** 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3 0
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updat
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645472/+attachment/1623818/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
Alarm Clock panel applet has several disfeatures.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645472
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
I don't know how to add a picture to this site, so I created a web page
on my site. Here is the URL
http://www.ezlink.ca/~jwinterton/Alarm%20applet%20bug%20illustrated.html
This really is a small error either in specification or programming. I
think it falls into the area of public relations.
Agreed. It is always good to have confirmed testing before a feature is
offered.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795558
Title:
Cannot change pointer
To manage notifica
Public bug reported:
I applied the published updates to oneiric beta this morning, and now I
no longer get any controls except for a menu in nautilus. ALT+F2 is not
working, so I can't get get a console command in.
Hope you will be able to fix this soon. Since I can't open a console, I
am unabl
Fixed by subsequent updates. Not surprising, I suppose, but this can
now be closed as being transient.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850336
Title:
Oneiric beta d
Fine, glad to help.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850336
Title:
Oneiric beta desktop non-functional.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.l
Interesting that a bug from 2010 should still be around. I haven't had
this problem lately, but if it still shows up in testing, it should be
fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu 13.10
Release:13.10
brasero:
Installed: 3.8.0-1ubuntu3
Candidate: 3.8.0-1ubuntu3
Version table:
*** 3.8.0-1ubuntu3 0
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ saucy/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
When invoked
Just installed trusty (14.04) and this upstream problem is still
present. Someone should send a message upstream that the system is for
the end user. This has been present for several releases and as a
programmer myself, I know this is a simple fix.
--
You received this bug notification because
--
Screen is presented blank with no content.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubu
Yes, please do. I should have closed it myself as it was fixed by a
published update (I don't know which one).
--
Screen is presented blank with no content.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscri
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu Saucy Salamander (development branch)
Release:13.10
nautilus:
Installed: 1:3.8.2-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:3.8.2-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 1:3.8.2-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ saucy/main amd64 Packages
Forgot to mention that the work around is to run the wine command from
the correct directory in the console. Works just fine thank you, but
the shortcut would be nice.
One gets into operating habits, and find the facilities missing is
rather more than slightly annoying.
--
You received this bug
One tends to wonder if "invalid" is simply a way of getting rid of this
problem without a statement that it has been addressed. I am currently
running the 12.10 Beta2 in test mode, and will have to examine this to
see if it is fixed or ameliorated in any way. It most certainly wasn't
in 12.04 LTS
Thanks for taking a second look at this, Dylan.
This carelessness with respect to the controls is like telling your
corporate receptionist that she is irrelevant to the business and is
just a pretty face. The settings panel and all the sub-pages are the
opening shot when a new users or one who is
Public bug reported:
$ gedit stat.txt
(gedit:6108): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_list_store_set_column_types: assertion
`priv->columns_dirty == 0' failed
Description:Ubuntu 12.10
Release:12.10
gedit:
Installed: 3.6.0-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 3.6.0-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 3.6.0-0ubunt
I look forward to testing 13.04. Hard to believe that a few windows
properties settings can be such a pain, but I do understand that the
man-power shortage can cause problems.
I think a lot of it can be solved by doing a more assiduous QA inside
the heads of the programmers. They seem to be an u
no recurrence, so closing is appropriate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951439
Title:
[soundnua]: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV
To manage
Still present in 13.04.
(gedit:3667): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_list_store_set_column_types:
assertion `priv->columns_dirty == 0' failed
Description:Ubuntu 13.04
Release:13.04
gedit:
Installed: 3.6.2-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 3.6.2-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 3.6.2-0ubuntu1 0
500
Well, here we are in 13.04 and this is not only not fixed but it also
affects the tweak tool. There seems to be some universal widget window
in use, and this is still unacceptable performance when some junior
programmer decided to see what would happen if he turned off the
variable geometry for so
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 951439 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951439
I don't seem to be allowed to see that page, so I am unable to comment.
I did fix my sound problem (wrong driver selected).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop B
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795558
Title:
Cannot change pointer
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/7955
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
Description:Ubuntu 11.04
Release:11.04
gdm:
Installed: 2.32.1-0ubuntu3.2
Candidate: 2.32.1-0ubuntu3.2
Version table:
*** 2.32.1-0ubuntu3.2 0
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main amd64
Packages
Subsequent note. I did change the pointer to black. I cannot get the
redglass pointer to work.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795558
Title:
Cannot change pointer
To
This should be removed from the list. Fixed in last update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795558
Title:
Cannot change pointer
To manage notifications about this bug
I think you can close this. I have switched to 11.04 and have not have
a recurrence. There has also been an upgrade to the ATI driver (fglrx)
that has fixed some other problems, It appears that there was an
initialization problem with gdm coming from some complication with Xorg
that has either b
I upgraded to 10.10. The bugs reported here are fixed in that release.
This bug should be closed out.
--
Alarm Clock panel applet has several disfeatures.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645472
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribe
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: brasero
Description:Ubuntu 10.10
Release:10.10
brasero:
Installed: 2.32.0-0ubuntu2
Candidate: 2.32.0-0ubuntu2
Version table:
*** 2.32.0-0ubuntu2 0
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Packages
100
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659927/+attachment/1691009/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
brasero fails to launch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659927
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
Program runs correctly from CLI.
Clearly, something serious has happened to your implementation of xorg
and related items. Not only have several programs failed to perform in
the GUI environment, but you have also broken my nvidia-96 driver,
disabling my high graphics environment.
This release s
I am sorry, it was all lost in a system crash yesterday. In light of
events, I had to format my disks, and I lost my archives as well, which
puts me back to square zero. I was so disgusted with 10.10 that I
retreated to 10.04 LTS.
Frankly, 10.10 has overtones of Vista. Rushed on to the scene fo
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Release:10.04
gdm:
Installed: 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu4
Candidate: 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu4
Version table:
*** 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu4 0
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-update
--
The case of the missing desktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666380
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listin
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
Description:Ubuntu 10.10
Release:10.10
nautilus:
Installed: 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages
--
Nautilus fails to detect the manual removal of media
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673141
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists
Admittedly, this is a cosmetic fix, but I don't think it should be let
go past the next release.
--
Nautilus fails to detect the manual removal of media
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673141
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed t
I have upgraded to the official release of 11.10 and this problem does
not appear. I think it can now be closed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747772
Title:
gdm fails
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
Description:Ubuntu Natty (development branch)
Release:11.04
gdm:
Installed: 2.32.0-0ubuntu14
Candidate: 2.32.0-0ubuntu14
Version table:
*** 2.32.0-0ubuntu14 0
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Package
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747772
Title:
gdm fails to come up completely.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
Public bug reported:
Because i have visual acuity problems it is necessary for me to use a
larger font on my desktop. This program and several others have fixed
windows boundaries and cannot be resized. Another example is the Menu
Editor (alacarte) which is insensitive of the font size along wit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257
Title:
Gnome-Control-Center window poorly programmed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.l
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257
Title:
the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
http
Considering that this kind of thing is a simply poor decision on the
part of a programmer/developer, I believe it should be fixed for 12.04
LTS.
Most GUI systems I have used default to full control of the widget
window. I believe that this and similar sins of omission such as the
same problem wit
Thanks, Seb. I do understand the point about software cycles.
I sometimes think that fixed software cycles are rules made to be
broken. I also understand the dearth of good developers.
I am sorry to say that I've been retired from programming now for nearly
25 years. I haven't written any "rea
Dylan, jgv:
I suggest, Dylan, you just try it and see what the effects are. They
are rather retarted, IMHO.
As a matter of interest, yesterday I pulled in all the necessary
software and tried the very first item in the Getting Started section of
GTK+ 3 reference manual. It runs without a hitch,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: file-roller
Description:Ubuntu 10.10
Release:10.10
file-roller:
Installed: 2.32.0-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 2.32.0-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696546
Title:
Crypic error comment
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
Most intriguing. I created an account and now it says my password is
invalid. I don't understand why there should be such a dichotomy for
bug reporting, and since I can't use GNOME Bugzilla until I get some
clarification, I will have to rest here. Frankly, I have had
contretemps with Bugzilla so
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: brasero
I have a mounted data CD and I asked Brasero to copy it to an image
file. I would have preferred an ISO image, but would have taken
anything if it could only do it at all. Brasero went through the
formalities then claimed that the module cdrdao
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51945048/Dependencies.txt
--
Brasero will not copy cd to image file because cdrdao is not present. False!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605637
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
The only cdrkit I could find was cdrkit-doc.
I widened my scope of updates to include the proposed objects, and got a
big update. Strangely, before the update, but after the chanve, cdrdao
showed as uninstalled where it showed as installed before this. If
brasero was looking for a specific versi
Widening the scope of updates was no help. An apparently new cdrdao was
loaded, but no soap. The matter is not so urgent that I am going to
wade through all the stuff in the cdrkit documentation to try and do
this by hand. However, whatever is going on should be solved. I think
brasero is looki
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
Lucid Lynx (10.4) released today.
I suspect this may not be a problem with gdm but the infrastructure governing
logins. Here is the scenario:
1. Perform a switch user from my ID
2. Login to root (yes, I need root user access)
3. Some maintenance
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/46708003/Dependencies.txt
--
Can't log in to suspended session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572603
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
** Attachment added: "BugInRootTerminal.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35668309/BugInRootTerminal.png
--
Screen is presented blank with no content. Happens on others as well. G.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gucharmap
This doesn't seem to be quite what has been previously reported.
Version is Karmic.
This package worked quite well up until today when I switched to
webdings to pick up an oddball character. When I went to switch fonts
for another need, the co
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36085330/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36085331/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36085332/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachm
58 matches
Mail list logo