Re: Is there a page like "who is using BK/DL"?

2016-12-05 Thread Sijie Guo
Sounds a good idea! Let's create one for that purpose. Sijie On Dec 5, 2016 6:00 PM, "Jia Zhai" wrote: > Yes. That is what I mean. By it, we may get more direct info about who is > intresting and want to try on it, not only who has used it for big case. > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Siji

Re: Is there a page like "who is using BK/DL"?

2016-12-05 Thread Jia Zhai
Yes. That is what I mean. By it, we may get more direct info about who is intresting and want to try on it, not only who has used it for big case. On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > I think both BK and DL have the poweredby cwiki page. Do you mean we open a > dummy github issue

[jira] [Assigned] (DL-45) DL should allow ByteBuffer based API and should avoid copying of arrays

2016-12-05 Thread Jia Zhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-45?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jia Zhai reassigned DL-45: -- Assignee: Jia Zhai > DL should allow ByteBuffer based API and should avoid copying of arrays > -

[jira] [Assigned] (DL-46) DL should have an API which supports atomic merging of two logs

2016-12-05 Thread Jia Zhai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jia Zhai reassigned DL-46: -- Assignee: Jia Zhai > DL should have an API which supports atomic merging of two logs > -

Re: Is there a page like "who is using BK/DL"?

2016-12-05 Thread Sijie Guo
I think both BK and DL have the poweredby cwiki page. Do you mean we open a dummy github issue for people to comment to register themselves? - Sijie On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Jia Zhai wrote: > Hi guys, > I found that in project RocketMQ, there is an open issue: > https://github.com/alibab

Re: Proxy Client - Batch Ordering / Commit

2016-12-05 Thread Leigh Stewart
Great discussion here :) Have you started any work for this? I just updated the proposal page - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DL/DP-2+-+Epoch+Write+Support > Maybe we can work together with this. Looks good Xi. If I understand the proposal correctly, this gets us, in thin client

[jira] [Commented] (DL-84) Reduce HashedWheelTimer instance number

2016-12-05 Thread Leigh Stewart (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15722632#comment-15722632 ] Leigh Stewart commented on DL-84: - First two are client, second two are server. Client and serv

[jira] [Commented] (DL-84) Reduce HashedWheelTimer instance number

2016-12-05 Thread Liang Xie (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15721557#comment-15721557 ] Liang Xie commented on DL-84: - grep -R "new HashedWheelTimer" .|grep -v "test" ./distributedlog-cli