Re: groovy-all 1.0 pom in central repo?

2007-10-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
? --jason - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven jason at sonatype

Re: Moving plugin-support bits out of Genesis into Mojo?

2007-02-24 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 24 Feb 07, at 9:07 PM 24 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote: On Feb 24, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 24 Feb 07, at 8:22 PM 24 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote: Folks, I'm thinking about moving the plugin-support module out of Genesis and into the Mojo project. A few plugins I mai

Re: Moving plugin-support bits out of Genesis into Mojo?

2007-02-24 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 24 Feb 07, at 8:22 PM 24 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote: Folks, I'm thinking about moving the plugin-support module out of Genesis and into the Mojo project. A few plugins I maintain there already use some parts of this, but the classes were simply duplicated. I'm also planning on updati

Re: no more modules for specs...

2006-12-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 16 Dec 06, at 7:49 PM 16 Dec 06, David Jencks wrote: On Dec 16, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: On Dec 16, 2006, at 9:33 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: IMO, we release source code. Binary distributions and maven artifacts are a convenience. If users can't build our source code,

Re: no more modules for specs...

2006-12-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 16 Dec 06, at 11:26 AM 16 Dec 06, Kevan Miller wrote: On Dec 15, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: this change really killed me for all of the build automation I have been working on... and was one of the reasons why I had warned against using this style of versioning. basically

Re: no more modules for specs...

2006-12-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 16 Dec 06, at 2:50 AM 16 Dec 06, Jason Dillon wrote: On Dec 15, 2006, at 11:05 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: I doubt it. When it came down to releases and updating artifacts and trying to tie everything all together. Lots of people might have problems but even now I bet there are people who

Re: no more modules for specs...

2006-12-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 16 Dec 06, at 3:40 AM 16 Dec 06, David Jencks wrote: On Dec 15, 2006, at 11:05 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Then don't use those repos, or label them as snapshot repos. As far as Geronimo is concerned why do you need anything more then central as a source? Aside from your SNA

Re: no more modules for specs...

2006-12-15 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 16 Dec 06, at 12:10 AM 16 Dec 06, Jason Dillon wrote: On Dec 15, 2006, at 7:51 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: IMO the remote repos are for user connivence *ONLY*, That is horse shit. What they contain is a product of what you people put in them. You guys for example have something that is

Re: no more modules for specs...

2006-12-15 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 15 Dec 06, at 6:41 PM 15 Dec 06, Jason Dillon wrote: this change really killed me for all of the build automation I have been working on... and was one of the reasons why I had warned against using this style of versioning. basically since this was removed, checking out the specs projec

Re: Organization and versioning of specs; a new proposal

2006-08-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
t of the respective pom. Comments? --jason Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Organization and versioning of specs; a new proposal

2006-08-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
7;t know it was split up into a separate module for each as I unsub'd from the list for a while. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Maven2... we are almost there!

2006-08-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
up going back to m1 please let us know so we can fix it. The last major issue left unresolved (that I am ware of) is the car plugins support for geronimo-plugin.xml fluff, which I am working on resolving. --jason Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Classloader code

2006-08-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, While working on some classloader code I noticed this: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/trunk/modules/kernel/src/java/ org/apache/geronimo/kernel/classloader/ Do you think that could be put in a separate module so that I could use it in ClassWorlds? Thanks, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL

Re: [Vote] Installer: Default Web Container Selection

2005-12-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
tion of both is possible though. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples. Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without actually developing a running system is doomed to failure.

Re: [VOTE] sponsor ActiveMQ & ServiceMix to become sub-projects of Geronimo

2005-11-18 Thread Jason van Zyl
I don't mind either way > [ ] -1 = I don't support this move because: ___ +1 > I'm obviously +1 :) > > James > --- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org believe nothi

Re: Specs build still fails (Maven 2)

2005-11-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
ployed the top-level POM but I can ... done. It will take a few hours to sync to ibiblio but then you should be able to checkout the specs and build. > Aaron > > On 11/5/05, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 20:29 -0500, Aaron Mulder wrote:

Re: Specs build still fails (Maven 2)

2005-11-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
> Unable to download the artifact from any repository > at > org.apache.maven.artifact.manager.DefaultWagonManager.getArtifact(DefaultWagonManager.java:260) > at > org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolve(DefaultArtifactResolver.java:124) > ... 20 more >

Re: Building specs with Maven 2.x

2005-10-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
nstall That will push the POM you need into your local repository and then you should be able to build the specs. I'll whip up a little document. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org Three people can keep a secret provided two of them are dead. -- Unknown

Building specs with Maven 2.x

2005-10-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
to-the-standard-directory-layout.html And getting a few tips about the corba module (Alan :-)). Everything else appears to be working. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org you are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting

Re: Geronimo ORB and Maven 2

2005-10-27 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 12:58 -0700, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Unless someone has an objection, I shall convert this to M2 as I put it > into the sandbox. I can help you too. > > Regards, > Alan > > > -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.ap

Re: Continuum and m2 (was Re: build failed Sat Jul...)

2005-07-09 Thread Jason van Zyl
. We can chat in IRC about per module builds, scheduling of builds and whatever else but there really isn't any reason we can try it. Continuum works fine with m1/shell scripts too. > :) > > -David > > -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org Three people can keep a secret provided two of them are dead. -- Unknown

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
directory structure and there's a site.xml file that's a little different then the navigation.xml but xdoc files as is work in m2. > geir > > On Jun 8, 2005, at 10:25 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 11:37 -0700, David Blevins wrote: > > >

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
; >> > > >>Lets decide if we want to go forward with this, even as a temporary > > >>measure. Maybe people will bite and want to contribute to it - at > > >>the worst, we get the site updated quickly and get the ApacheCon EU > > >>ad on it... > > >> > > >> > > > > > >+1 From me for the same reasons you state. We can get fancy as > > >time allows. Baby steps. > > > > > >Thanks, > > >David > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org the course of true love never did run smooth ... -- Shakespeare

Re: Using entities to manage dependency versions

2004-10-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
to garner some feedback now if possible. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://maven.apache.org happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come and sit softly on your shoulder ... -- Thoreau

Re: Using entities to manage dependency versions

2004-10-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
r you because > > of the use of the ant:property tag, but if you tried using the standard > > form of inheritance I think you could actually use what's recommended. > > > > If you have actually it without the ant:property task and it doesn't > > work then it&#

Re: Using entities to manage dependency versions

2004-10-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 12:00, Bruce Snyder wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: > The main reason I began using the entity solution was because I could > not get the property inheritance working at all. However, upon further > investigation by my friend Jeff Genender, it appears

Using entities to manage dependency versions

2004-10-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
nded. If you have actually it without the ant:property task and it doesn't work then it's a bug and needs to be fixed but people have been reporting that inheritance generally works now in m1. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://maven.apache.org happiness is like a butte

Re: Who has access to ibiblio for Geronimo?

2004-10-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
POMs placed in there for each artifact you deploy. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://maven.apache.org happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come and sit softly on your shoulder ... -- Thoreau