Allan Yang created HBASE-20903:
--
Summary: backport HBASE-20792 "info:servername and info:sn
inconsistent for OPEN region" to branch-2.0
Key: HBASE-20903
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20903
Sorry for being late. Checking now and will get back hours later with
result.
Best Regards,
Yu
On 17 July 2018 at 14:02, Ankit Singhal wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> -- Build from src - Ok
> -- Started local cluster and ran selected Integration test - Ok
> -- Basic shell commands - Ok
> -- Ran r
Hari Sekhon created HBASE-20904:
---
Summary: Prometheus /metrics http endpoint for monitoring
integration
Key: HBASE-20904
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20904
Project: HBase
I
Mike Drob created HBASE-20905:
-
Summary: branch-1 docker build fails
Key: HBASE-20905
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20905
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Task
Components:
+1
- Built tar ball from src
- Exercised some shell commands
- Checked process and audit logs for operations
- Verified replication
Regards,
Ashish
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:39 AM, 张铎(Duo Zhang)
wrote:
> The second release candidate for Apache HBase 2.1.0 is available for
> downloading and test
Glenn Kruszewski created HBASE-20906:
Summary: Hbase shell using Cygwin gives the error Could not find
or load main class org.jruby.Main
Key: HBASE-20906
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20906
+0
Verified signatures and hashes.
Built tgz from src.
Ran built hbase.
Loaded some data.
Confirmed it all made it in.
Checked logs.
Checked layout.
RELEASENOTES.md and CHANGES.md look great.
Undid the bin tgz. Doc looks good. And content.
New client bin looks good (ouch on size).
Deployed on s
Yu Li created HBASE-20907:
-
Summary: Fix Intermittent failure on TestProcedurePriority
Key: HBASE-20907
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20907
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Test
+1
S
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 8:29 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Given how often we end up accepting contributions despite
> test-for-tests complaining about lack of changed or new tests would
> anyone be opposed to me changing its vote from -1 to -0?
>
> The rationale for discounting its