Thank you everybody for your input!
I'm sorry for the delay: I've been making Christmas cards, etc. (Go
LibreOffice!)
I wish I had something satisfying to report, but I'm still fiddling. If I get a
well-working setup, and it's not already in TEXTEDITORS.md, I'll definitely add
it.
~
In general, please anyone on this thread:
If you clarify suggestions that can be good for new contributors with
little or no qualifications, submit merge-request changes to the
TEXTEDITORS.md document.
While we can't take on every issue in the Haskell ecosystem, we
certainly have an interest in
>
>
> haskdogs sounds like it's solving a similar problem to codex. Any
> insight to their relative strengths and weaknesses?
>
>
Oh wow. I was not aware of codex, so I can't compare them, but I'll
definitely be trying that out. At first glance, I think haskdogs is stack
specific and codex is not,
On 11/14/2017 11:04 AM, Samuel Tay wrote:
> Hasktags generates pretty much all the tags you want relevant to
> your project. If you have git submodules, forks of other projects
> locally, etc. then you can pass these directly via the CLI, e.g.
>
> hasktags -b "src deps/package1 deps/package2
On 11/14/2017 12:02 PM, David Thomas wrote:
> While the general case for TH is intractable, it would probably be
> pretty simple to write a script that can generate tags locations for
> identifiers generated by specific, known cases - particularly
> Persistent.
>
> At work I took a bit of a
Hasktags generates pretty much all the tags you want relevant to your
project. If you have git submodules, forks of other projects locally, etc.
then you can pass these directly via the CLI, e.g.
hasktags -b "src deps/package1 deps/package2 /some/other/location"
Another cool tool built off
Hi!
On 11/13/2017 06:30 AM, jake wrote:
> In Haskell code, I'd like the ability to click an identifier and go
> to its definition. How do I do this?
You're not alone in your frustration. I think the only people who have
a really good answer to this question are users of emacs + intero (+
