Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-11-03 Thread Santosh Marella
gt; >> > > But >> >> > > > that's something worth exploring. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Thanks, >> >> > > > Santosh >> >>

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-29 Thread Santosh Marella
gt; > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> On MYRIAD-160, it's a really bad idea to let Myriad pick a random > >> port > >> > > >> outside of Mesos as other frameworks might select that port the > >> > &g

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-29 Thread Jim Klucar
gt;> probability >> > > >> of that happening is 1-(number of ports requested by other >> > > >> frameworks)/(number of ports in use). This could get near 50% and >> > cause >> > > >> frameworks that are being good citizens to crash.

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-29 Thread Jim Klucar
> frameworks)/(number of ports in use). This could get near 50% and > > cause > > > >> frameworks that are being good citizens to crash. > > > >> > > > >> I'm also not convinced randomizing the port is in fact the correct > f

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-29 Thread Santosh Marella
> > for > > >> this in the long term, as there is still a non-zero chance you'll get > > that > > >> port again. > > >> > > >> Darin > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:56 AM,

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-29 Thread Jim Klucar
> >> port again. > >> > >> Darin > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:56 AM, yuliya Feldman < > >> yufeld...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> > Great list. > >> > I would in

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-27 Thread Santosh Marella
feld...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: >> >> > Great list. >> > I would include MYRIAD-160 to the list - I am working on that one. Of >> > course as a workaround we could not use Mesos ports and let NM ports >> > randomization kick in.I also almost done with MYRIA

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-23 Thread Santosh Marella
hould submit PR tonight. > > Thanks,Yuliya > > From: Darin Johnson > > To: Dev > > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 8:29 PM > > Subject: Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0 > > > > I think this sounds good about right. A few Jim marked were new > features,

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-23 Thread Darin Johnson
s much lower chance then consistently getting the same port w/o > randomization. > Thanks,Yuliya From: Darin Johnson > To: Dev ; yuliya Feldman < > yufeld...@yahoo.com> > Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 9:57 AM > Subject: Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0 > > On MYRIAD

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-23 Thread yuliya Feldman
Subject: Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0 On MYRIAD-160, it's a really bad idea to let Myriad pick a random port outside of Mesos as other frameworks might select that port the probability of that happening is 1-(number of ports requested by other frameworks)/(number of ports in use).  This could get

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-23 Thread Jim Klucar
hat one. Of > > course as a workaround we could not use Mesos ports and let NM ports > > randomization kick in.I also almost done with MYRIAD-148 - it was really > > tricky. Should submit PR tonight. > > Thanks,Yuliya > > From: Darin Johnson > > > To: Dev > &g

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-23 Thread Darin Johnson
> Thanks,Yuliya > From: Darin Johnson > To: Dev > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 8:29 PM > Subject: Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0 > > I think this sounds good about right. A few Jim marked were new features, > gotta leave something for the 0.2.0 release :). > &g

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-22 Thread yuliya Feldman
Johnson To: Dev Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 8:29 PM Subject: Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0 I think this sounds good about right.  A few Jim marked were new features, gotta leave something for the 0.2.0 release :). On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Santosh Marella wrote: > I looked at

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-22 Thread Darin Johnson
I think this sounds good about right. A few Jim marked were new features, gotta leave something for the 0.2.0 release :). On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Santosh Marella wrote: > I looked at the JIRAs currently marked with fix version "myriad-0.1.0". > There were 19 of them. I moved a few out

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-22 Thread Santosh Marella
> just didn't want things to be missed.. Jim.. great thinking! Let me know if you see a JIRA that should be in the show stopper list. And.. thanks for being an amazing volunteer on the project! Regards, Santosh On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Jim Klucar wrote: > Sounds good. I wasn't trying t

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-22 Thread Jim Klucar
Sounds good. I wasn't trying to usurp Santosh at all, just didn't want things to be missed and I saw some easy ones out there. Just so you know, even though my vote isn't a binding one, I plan on deploying the release and testing it. Jim On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Santosh Marella wrote: >

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-22 Thread Santosh Marella
I looked at the JIRAs currently marked with fix version "myriad-0.1.0". There were 19 of them. I moved a few out. We are currently at 14. However, IMO the show stoppers are really the following: MYRIAD-43 Replace com.ebay namespace with org.apache MYRIAD-44 Prepare for 0.1.0 release MYRIAD-98 Mov

Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-21 Thread Adam Bordelon
Keep in mind that Santosh (as Release Manager) has final authority over pushing things out of 0.1.0. I created a (hopefully public) filter for Unresolved 0.1.0 Myriad JIRAs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYRIAD-44?filter=12333786 Maybe we should create a dashboard too, like https://issues

JIRA work for 0.1.0

2015-10-21 Thread Jim Klucar
I went through JIRA and assigned a bunch of the tickets to the Myriad 0.1.0 release. Some of them are really low hanging fruit, so I think we can knock most of these out. As Adam said in the meeting, we'd rather have too many flagged for the release and pair down rather than miss some. To that end,