Yes, the distclean is also skipped.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 4:52 PM Sebastien Lorquet
wrote:
> Ah, perfect, this is great to know, thanks!
>
> I believe the "expected location" is not destroyed by make distclean?
>
> This is a minor point. The local tarball can always be redeployed to the
> corre
Ah, perfect, this is great to know, thanks!
I believe the "expected location" is not destroyed by make distclean?
This is a minor point. The local tarball can always be redeployed to the
correct place prior to the make command.
Sebastien
Le 07/11/2022 à 03:50, Xiang Xiao a écrit :
With http
With https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/1295, you can just
clone(or use submodule/repo) the code to the Makefile's expected location,
the build system will skip the download step.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 4:23 AM Abdelatif Guettouche <
abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are
> Are there provisions to use a pre-downloaded tarball for external projects?
There is none at the moment. However, an option can be added to just
copy from a local folder instead of downloading them. Or the makefile
can start with that and fallback to downloading if the tarball is not
present.
Hi Sebastien,
Good question, AFAIK there is not yet a command to just download the
necessary tar balls and keep them in a downloaded area to use later.
If I remember correctly some build systems like Buildroot and Yocto
has this option.
BR,
Alan
On 11/3/22, Sebastien Lorquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
littlefs too.
This raises an important question for me: how do I handle such a build
in a self-contained, "airgapped" machine?
Are there provisions to use a pre-downloaded tarball for external projects?
Sebastien
Le 28/10/2022 à 18:30, Alan C. Assis a écrit :
Hi Sebastien,
AFAIK there
Hi Sebastien,
AFAIK there is not such directive, although it is always need to add
support to NuttX on external projects.
External projects needs to be integrated to be downloaded and compiled
dynamically, once again like LVGL.
BR,
Alan
On 10/28/22, Sebastien Lorquet wrote:
> IIRC the idea wa
An idea is, to offer a OS abstraction layer for databases, like ODBC did
on Windows. Then, particular driver could do the connection to
PostgreSQL, MySQL, whatever. But I agree, that the database drivers need
to be brought to nuttx first.
@Alan, is this MySQL port to nuttx somewhere available,
IIRC the idea was that we dont integrate code fom externally maintained
projects?
Also IIRC the acceptable method is a specific makefile that downloads
code and patch/builds it.
I agree that such libs go into apps.
Sebastien
Le 27/10/2022 à 19:28, Nathan Hartman a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 27, 2
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 12:19 PM Alan C. Assis wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I think someone else told some time ago that he used a similar lib for
> mysql, I think it was Ivan.
>
> Those libs inside nuttx/libs/ are libs used by the kernel and apps,
> but in this case the lib should be put inside apps
Hi Michael,
I think someone else told some time ago that he used a similar lib for
mysql, I think it was Ivan.
Those libs inside nuttx/libs/ are libs used by the kernel and apps,
but in this case the lib should be put inside apps/databases/postgres
for example. It should be a lib just like apps/g
11 matches
Mail list logo