Nice, let me write up the documentation, and then maybe you or some other
here on the dev list can give it a try and see if it is easy enough to use.
Jörn
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3010) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> I have a use case for this too in NASA pl
I have a use case for this too in NASA planetary data..
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212)
NASA Jet Propu
+1 from me
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Offic
There is no official information about brat automatic annotation services.
I just did not found any example about relations (so i proposed something
like:"R1": {"Arg1": "T5", "Arg2": "T3", "label": "relname"})
However, +1 if opennlp includes brat support.
By the way, I coded a pyhton Class that
Looks like POS Tagging is not supported by Brat.
Jörn
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Joern Kottmann wrote:
> There is a dedicated servlet which implements exactly the protocol brat
> requires. We can extend it to make it available for other tools.
>
> Do you know any other annotation tools we
Don't know if there is an documentation, it is a JSON format, I had some
problems to get that working and then brat people fixed things a bit.
Anyway, it is rather simple, have a look at the code, I don't have any
better reference for you.
https://github.com/apache/opennlp-sandbox/blob/master/ope
Sorry, I meant protocol, not format... I do know the brat format.
Best,
-- Richard
> On 19.10.2016, at 21:30, Joern Kottmann wrote:
>
> Have a look at this page:
> http://brat.nlplab.org/standoff.html
>
> Jörn
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho <
> richard.eck
Have a look at this page:
http://brat.nlplab.org/standoff.html
Jörn
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho <
richard.eck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19.10.2016, at 20:59, Joern Kottmann wrote:
> >
> > There is a dedicated servlet which implements exactly the protocol brat
>
On 19.10.2016, at 20:59, Joern Kottmann wrote:
>
> There is a dedicated servlet which implements exactly the protocol brat
> requires. We can extend it to make it available for other tools.
Slightly off topic: is that format documented somewhere? I was looking at
the brat documentation, but didn
There is a dedicated servlet which implements exactly the protocol brat
requires. We can extend it to make it available for other tools.
Do you know any other annotation tools we might want to support? As far as
I am aware there is brat and not much else.
We should add support for the POS Tagger
+1
Do you think latter we can expand the annotator server to other tools?
2016-10-19 7:05 GMT-02:00 Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara :
> +1
>
> Madhawa
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:20 PM, "Shuo Xu" wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Joern Kottmann
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hell
+1
Madhawa
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:20 PM, "Shuo Xu" wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Joern Kottmann
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > what do you think about including the brat ner annotator in the 1.6.1
> > release?
> >
> > I believe it is important that we include it to
+1
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Joern Kottmann wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> what do you think about including the brat ner annotator in the 1.6.1
> release?
>
> I believe it is important that we include it to allow our users to easier
> run custom annotation projects, as part of the move we nee
+1
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Joern Kottmann wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> what do you think about including the brat ner annotator in the 1.6.1
> release?
>
> I believe it is important that we include it to allow our users to easier
> run custom annotation projects, as part of the move we need t
Hello all,
what do you think about including the brat ner annotator in the 1.6.1
release?
I believe it is important that we include it to allow our users to easier
run custom annotation projects, as part of the move we need to extend the
documentation so everyone can easily get it up and running
15 matches
Mail list logo