Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-22 Thread jan iversen
I have added a new branch "l10n", to test the new l10n tools and make makefile/build changes without disturbing the main branch. The wiki page "source code" is updated. Jan. On 22 November 2012 16:23, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag, 15. November 2012 um 22:20 schrieb jan iversen:

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-22 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Am Donnerstag, 15. November 2012 um 22:20 schrieb jan iversen: > On 15 November 2012 22:16, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, jan iversen > > wrote: > > > +1 to move. > > > > > > But please help me out with a simple question, if I delete a > > file/directory > > > in SV

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-15 Thread jan iversen
On 15 November 2012 22:16, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, jan iversen > wrote: > > +1 to move. > > > > But please help me out with a simple question, if I delete a > file/directory > > in SVN, I assume it is only deleted from that version, so if I do a > > checkout of an old

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-15 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, jan iversen wrote: > +1 to move. > > But please help me out with a simple question, if I delete a file/directory > in SVN, I assume it is only deleted from that version, so if I do a > checkout of an old version it is included ?? > If you check out a tree you get

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-15 Thread jan iversen
+1 to move. But please help me out with a simple question, if I delete a file/directory in SVN, I assume it is only deleted from that version, so if I do a checkout of an old version it is included ?? If I am correct, why do we keep these things in trunk ? rgds jan I. On 15 November 2012 21:57

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-15 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM, jan iversen wrote: > Apart from the branches it seems we have a directory called "trunk-orig", > that only seems to contain 3 files, are they important ?? > > +1 to remove branches when they are integrated, it gives a lot better > overview. > These were some scrip

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-15 Thread jan iversen
Apart from the branches it seems we have a directory called "trunk-orig", that only seems to contain 3 files, are they important ?? +1 to remove branches when they are integrated, it gives a lot better overview. Jan. On 15 November 2012 13:19, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:03 PM,

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-15 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: > > On 11/14/2012 3:10 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make sense >> to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what each >> one is, and who is maintaining it? >> >> Current bran

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-15 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: > On 15.11.2012 10:33, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: >> >> On 15.11.2012 00:10, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make sense >>> to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what eac

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-15 Thread Herbert Duerr
On 15.11.2012 10:33, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: On 15.11.2012 00:10, Rob Weir wrote: I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make sense to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what each one is, and who is maintaining it? Current branches are: [...] writer

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-15 Thread Andre Fischer
On 15.11.2012 00:10, Rob Weir wrote: I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make sense to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what each one is, and who is maintaining it? Current branches are: AOO34/ --- Our 3.4.x branch, would be used if we ever need a 3.

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-15 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 15.11.2012 00:10, Rob Weir wrote: I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make sense to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what each one is, and who is maintaining it? Current branches are: AOO34/ --- Our 3.4.x branch, would be used if we ever need

Re: Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-14 Thread Andrew Rist
On 11/14/2012 3:10 PM, Rob Weir wrote: I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make sense to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what each one is, and who is maintaining it? Current branches are: AOO34/ --- Our 3.4.x branch, would be used if we ever need a

Look at the pretty branches

2012-11-14 Thread Rob Weir
I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make sense to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what each one is, and who is maintaining it? Current branches are: AOO34/ --- Our 3.4.x branch, would be used if we ever need a 3.4.2 alg/ -- This is Armin's long-term