Ok, I'll have to admit defeat and let the ambiguity continue...
;)
On 21 Jul 2014 17:08, "Howard Lewis Ship" wrote:
> I think Thiago's summary ... that tapestry-ioc is five years old, so
> renaming it will cause more confusion than good, is right on the money. I
> would not support a rename.
>
I think Thiago's summary ... that tapestry-ioc is five years old, so
renaming it will cause more confusion than good, is right on the money. I
would not support a rename.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:46:00 -0
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:46:00 -0300, Lance Java
wrote:
How's about tapioca as a name suggestion? It has references to tapestry
and ioc. :)
That's making me hungry and it's not lunch time here yet! :D
A quick Google search for "tapioca framework" shows a number of existing
stuff with that
Now with structured answers, leaving the explanations for that other
answer I've posted:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 05:02:28 -0300, Lance Java
wrote:
So, I have some questions to consider.
1. Do you agree that tapestry-ioc should be renamed?
No, as renames creates confusions by themselves. The
How's about tapioca as a name suggestion? It has references to tapestry and
ioc. :)
On 21 Jul 2014 14:38, "Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo"
wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 05:02:28 -0300, Lance Java
> wrote:
>
> I asked this question before I was a committer and generally got good
>> feedback but it
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 05:02:28 -0300, Lance Java
wrote:
I asked this question before I was a committer and generally got good
feedback but it never really went anywhere.
I think having tapestry-ioc and tapestry (the web framework) is a bit
confusing. I also feel that it hinders the promotion /
As discussed, I'm not suggesting to move the project outside of the
tapestry build / release. I'm also not tied to the hivemind name.
I constantly find myself saying tapestry (the web framework) and
tapestry-ioc on the user's list. A rename would help remove this ambiguity.
On 21 Jul 2014 11:42, "
I don't think it's a good idea to resurrect old software product names,
because you bring with them all the old connotations. To the extent people
know about Hivemind, they think of the product as old, out of date & dead.
Also, there were good reasons why Tapestry-IOC was not treated as a
distinct
Hi,
Am 19.07.2014 10:02, schrieb Lance Java:
I think having tapestry-ioc and tapestry (the web framework) is a bit
confusing. I also feel that it hinders the promotion / adoption of
tapestry-ioc as a standalone product.
I see your point. I don't really have a strong opinion about that
matter,
Hi,
Am 19.07.2014 05:35, schrieb Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo:
Beside the ones in this thread, any other ones that cannot wait for
5.4.1? I think all major stuff, specially JavaScript, was implemented
already.
I'd really like to have the asset/charset-related issues fixed for
5.4.0. I guess i
10 matches
Mail list logo