Here is the draft of the January 2018 board report - please let me know if
there is anything else to add.
---
## Description:
Apache TinkerPop is a graph computing framework for both graph databases
(OLTP) and graph analy
Github user spmallette closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/826
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/825
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16423918#comment-16423918
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1930:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1930.
---
Resolution: Done
> Drop support for Giraph
> ---
>
>
I'll just answer your basic question at this point and say that I'm not
aware of anyone working on those kinds of things with TinkerPop in mind.
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 10:06 PM, david.g.bo...@gmail.com <
david.g.bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there any groups trying to implement machine learning
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1246.
---
Resolution: Won't Do
Closing - won't do anything further on this one. thanks
> 'h
Reviving this thread a bit - a quick summary of where things were left:
1. no one seems specifically against adding a tool of this kind (though
Florian went so far as to be positive on doing so)
2. if we did add a tool it was a good suggestion to get the tool selected
first and then slowly enable
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/828
@harsh9t i've merged your PR and rebased the TINKERPOP-1878 branch on
tp33. please make sure that you update your fork. i'm beginning to think we
should rebase to master so that sparql-gremli
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/828
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16424139#comment-16424139
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1878:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Could somebody explain how adding a multi-language tool makes adding a
single-language tool undesirable, given one doesn't strictly cover another?
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, 16:36 Stephen Mallette, wrote:
> Reviving this thread a bit - a quick summary of where things were left:
>
> 1. no one seems spec
Hello,
We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.8 is ready for release.
The release artifacts can be found at this location:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.8/
The source distribution is provided by:
apache-tinkerpop-3.2.8-src.zip
Two binary distributions
Branden Moore created TINKERPOP-1933:
Summary: gremlin-python maximum recursion depth exceeded on large
responses
Key: TINKERPOP-1933
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1933
Proj
Looks good.
*Validating binary distributions*
* downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin
(apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.8-bin.zip)... OK
* validating signatures and checksums ...
* PGP signature ... OK
* MD5 checksum ... OK
* SHA1 checksum ... OK
* unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ...
Sure, I think that I was the one to specifically say that I didn't agree
that "running more tools was better". Sorry, I should have said more on
that to explain why I felt that way.
Shouldn't projects consider the cost to each new tool that gets added the
build chain? It seems undesirable to me fo
validate-distributions.sh was clean for me. also gave some review to the
docs and what i looked at seemed good to go:
VOTE +1
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> *Validating binary distributions*
>
> * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin
> (apache-tinkerpop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette reopened TINKERPOP-1870:
-
> n^2 synchronious operation in OLAP WorkerExecutor.execute() method
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1870:
Component/s: hadoop
> n^2 synchronious operation in OLAP WorkerExecutor.execute(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1870.
---
Resolution: Implemented
added component field
> n^2 synchronious operation in OLA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette reopened TINKERPOP-1858:
-
> HttpChannelizer regression: Does not create specified AuthenticationHandler
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1858:
Labels: (was: easyfix regression)
> HttpChannelizer regression: Does not creat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1858.
---
Resolution: Fixed
just cleared some labels that we don't track so that they don't
It's definitely hard enough to get one tool done right, as demonstrated by
the broken PR, let alone trying to get several tools done right. It makes
sense for our team to choose one tool that's most broadly applicable. We
can master that one tool and use it to its full extent. Then we can
evaluate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16424448#comment-16424448
]
Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-1711:
---
I don't know why, but in our cu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Kuppitz closed TINKERPOP-1711.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.3.2
> map(union(fold())) bug
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16424457#comment-16424457
]
Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-1711:
---
Funny, also works in {{tp33/}},
Hello,
We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.3.2 is ready for release.
The release artifacts can be found at this location:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.3.2/
The source distribution is provided by:
apache-tinkerpop-3.3.2-src.zip
Two binary distribution
28 matches
Mail list logo