Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

On 02/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Martin Dubuc wrote: > > > What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially > released? > > > > > that is based on the voting results, which passed, so yes, it will be > released. I've not seen the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail ? > > > If

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

Martin Dubuc wrote: What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released? that is based on the voting results, which passed, so yes, it will be released. If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 13:22 -0400, Martin Dubuc wrote: > What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released? > If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released? If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/? Martin On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Remy Maucherat

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 01:33 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: >> The candidates binaries are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ >> >> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: >> [ ] Broken >> [ ] Alpha

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 01:33 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] Stable Ok, so with one exception, all voted

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

2009/5/24 Konstantin Kolinko : > 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat : >> The candidates binaries are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ >> >> According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: >> [ ] Broken >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [x] Stable >> > > I do not see any issu

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 17:02 +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > I do not see any issues with the release, except the one > of the tgz sources archive. > > Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following: > The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip > archive

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

On 25/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2009/5/24 sebb : > > > On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > >> 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat : > >> > >> > The candidates binaries are available here: > >> > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ > >> > > >> > According to the releas

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

2009/5/24 sebb : > On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >> 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat : >> >> > The candidates binaries are available here: >>  > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ >>  > >>  > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: >>  > [ ] Broken >>  > [ ] Alpha >>

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat : > > > The candidates binaries are available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ > > > > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: > > [ ] Broken > > [ ] Alpha > > [ ] Beta > > > [x] Stable

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat : > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [x] Stable > I do not see any issues with the release, except the one of the tg

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

On 22.05.2009 15:45, Mark Thomas wrote: > 2. i18n resources are still corrupted. There is a patch already in the > STATUS file to fix this. Was an issue in 6.0.18 so this is a bug that > has not been fixed rather than a regression. But only for the tarball source distribution, right? I checked som

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

Remy Maucherat wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] Stable > > Rémy Observations -src.tar.gz - hashes match, key in WOT (more sigs

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

Just clarification: The tgz is broken. Assuming that is fixed, I see no problems and the actual *codebase* is [X] Stable On May 20, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: [X] Broken On May 20, 2009, at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote: extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file.

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable - To unsubscribe

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

On 14.05.2009 01:33, Remy Maucherat wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] Stable --

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[X] Stable Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

[X] Broken On May 20, 2009, at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote: extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file. All jars should ideally have N&L files, but they must be present if the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here. The EXE fails to install the following fil

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file. All jars should ideally have N&L files, but they must be present if the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here. The EXE fails to install the following file: RELEASE-NOTES It also fails to install RUNNING.txt a

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

On 14.05.2009 01:33, Remy Maucherat wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] Stable Please stay tuned, I can test and vote tomorrow. Th

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Looks OK :-) Cheers Jean-Frederic Rémy --

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat : > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] Stable > > Rémy > The tgz archive of the sources is broken. Some of the fi

[VOTE] Release build 6.0.20

The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsu