qt-mobility on a generic non-wireless KDE desktop PC?

Is this wasteful new dependency on Nokia intentional? -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- devel mailing list deve

Re: Mass bug: packages should not auto-enable systemd units

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:02:30AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > Due to some confusion around how alternatives worked, I screwed up the > list of packages here. I've updated it below. I'll give it a few > more days before filing the actual bugs. > abrt > acpid > aeolus-audrey-agent > aeolus-c

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > If that's what you think, okay. I do agree with you that suids & all are the > worse thing. After all, it's like winning the lottery for hackers and that's > probably where they focus most. But still fear something ending up execute

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

Em 30-04-2014 07:57, Lennart Poettering escreveu: On Tue, 29.04.14 15:36, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner (marcelo.leit...@gmail.com) wrote: Em 29-04-2014 12:27, Lennart Poettering escreveu: On Tue, 29.04.14 10:37, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote: On 04/29/2014 06:33 AM, Lennart Poetterin

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: The Shogun Machine Learning Toolbox

On 30 April 2014 14:10, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: The Shogun Machine Learning Toolbox = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/shogun > > Change owner(s): Björn Esser > > SHOGUN is a large Scale Machine Learning Toolbox, being implemented in C++ and > offering i

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 03:55:59PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:12 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > If I once connected to an open network called "MyFavoriteCoffeeShop" > > then later on someone creates a network with the same name but with > > malicous intent, will Network

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:12 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:06:51PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > >> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote: > > >> >

Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-24 16:00 UTC)

Lennart Poettering wrote: Hmm, we should probably do our homework first from the systemd side, and provide some RPM macros so that packages installing binfmt snippets can actually register/unregister them on package installation/deinstallation correctly. And when that's done we should probably as

Dracut HostOnly two releases later

looks like https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly over the long has the opposite effect and more and more modules are included in the hostonly-initrd because regressions right and left people who used hostonly before the feature on machines where it is fine where down below 5 MB, w

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:06:51PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > >> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote: > >> > >> > Why would you care for the domain name as provided by dhcp ?

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote: >> >> > Why would you care for the domain name as provided by dhcp ? >> >> internal DNS views, eg server.internal.corp.com where the search domain

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > Why would you care for the domain name as provided by dhcp ? > > internal DNS views, eg server.internal.corp.com where the search domain > gets set to "internal.corp.com" and "server.corp.com" do

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote: Why would you care for the domain name as provided by dhcp ? internal DNS views, eg server.internal.corp.com where the search domain gets set to "internal.corp.com" and "server.corp.com" does not exist. By default you wouldn't want that as you roam with

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 12:16 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > On 04/30/2014 01:17 AM, P J P wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 3:18 AM, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > >> On my home LAN, I run my own DNSSEC-enabled server using F20 & bind 9. > >> This local server also is my DHCP and Samba server. As usual

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Dan Williams wrote: Untrusted networks use WPA too, like coffee shops that don't leave the network open, but write the WPA key on the chalkboard menu or print it on standup cards at the tables. I've seen quite a few of these. You are at least consciously logging into that

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

Am 30.04.2014 20:38, schrieb Dan Williams: > There's really no guessing what's trusted/not-trusted unless you're > using 802.1x/WPA Enterprise, or if the user has told you explicitly to > trust this network thank you! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 13:22 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Robert Marcano wrote: > > > What about domain and search lines? If NetworkManager will always use > > 127.0.0.1, it should still modify resolv.conf with the domain name received > > from DHCP > > That's actually not a

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-05-01 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2014-05-01 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2014-05-01 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2014-05-01 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2014-05-01 16

Re: Mass bug: packages should not auto-enable systemd units

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> >> Hi >> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: spacenavd >>> Right or wrong, the decis

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Remote Journal Logging

So, this change went to fesco last week, but there were some questions/issues around it. Could change owners respond to: 1) sgallagh wasn't sure this was a self contained change: see: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1250#comment:19 2) FESCo in general wondered if we advertised this as a c

Re: Mass bug: packages should not auto-enable systemd units

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> >>> spacenavd >>> >>> Right or wrong, the decision for enabling spacenavd by default is that >> you would only inst

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: It is hard to find anything useful by searching for "rpm collections". Yeah, they're not well documented yet. Luckily I was able to track down a copy of the rpm source so I could read how it works. "In an industry wrought with broken

Re: Mass bug: packages should not auto-enable systemd units

Hi On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> spacenavd >> >> Right or wrong, the decision for enabling spacenavd by default is that > you would only install the package if you have one of these devices. > Nothing should

Re: Mass bug: packages should not auto-enable systemd units

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > spacenavd > > Right or wrong, the decision for enabling spacenavd by default is that you would only install the package if you have one of these devices. Nothing should be pulling it in so it needs to be explicitly installed by the user

Re: Mass bug: packages should not auto-enable systemd units

Due to some confusion around how alternatives worked, I screwed up the list of packages here. I've updated it below. I'll give it a few more days before filing the actual bugs. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > Hi everyone- > > This is a notice in accordance with the m

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-04-30)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-04-30) === Meeting started by dgilmore at 17:01:09 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-04-30/fesco.2

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Robert Marcano wrote: What about domain and search lines? If NetworkManager will always use 127.0.0.1, it should still modify resolv.conf with the domain name received from DHCP That's actually not always correct from a security point of view. If you set your system do h

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 12:34 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:28:56AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:05 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > For example, when a package bar has a postinstall script that does: > > > > > > systemctl enable bar.service

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On 04/30/2014 01:17 AM, P J P wrote: On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 3:18 AM, Al Dunsmuir wrote: On my home LAN, I run my own DNSSEC-enabled server using F20 & bind 9. This local server also is my DHCP and Samba server. As usual, dynamic clients receive the LAN local domain ID and DNS serve

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On 30.4.2014 15:29, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 08:49 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: On tis, 2014-04-29 at 11:24 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 17:15 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: On tis, 2014-04-29 at 14:15 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed System Wide C

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:28:56AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:05 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > I suspect just dropping the deps would break initial installations, e.g. > > anaconda / livecd-creator. RPM uses the deps to order the transaction so > > that systemd gets i

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-04-30)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/30/2014 12:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > I've got a conflicting meeting and will probably show up late -- > sorry for the late notice. > I also have a conflicting meeting and will be an hour late. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-04-30)

I've got a conflicting meeting and will probably show up late -- sorry for the late notice. -- Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project-- "Tepid change for the somewhat better!" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On 30 April 2014 15:52, Kalev Lember wrote: > Getting rid of the copy-pasted rpm scriptlets would be a huge win. Totally agree. We should make this happen. SUSE has been doing it for years. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On 04/30/2014 02:52 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: On 04/30/2014 04:28 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: If you are right, this is an argument for rpm collections, which we've had for ages now and should really start using. YES! Getting rid of the copy-pasted rpm scriptlets would be a huge win. They are error

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Wayland

Hi! Jaroslav Reznik wrote on 30.04.2014 16:27: > - Original Message - >> Jaroslav Reznik wrote on 29.04.2014 14:04: >> > Port the GNOME desktop to Wayland. >> >> Sorry, but what is actually proposed here? The above sentence for me >> doesn't make any sense(¹), as Gnome 3.12 is able to run

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On 04/30/2014 04:24 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 04/30/2014 10:05 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: >> For example, when a package bar has a postinstall script that does: >> >> systemctl enable bar.service >/dev/null 2>&1 || : >> >> .. but if systemctl gets installed _after_ foo in the same transaction

Re: fedora-atomic discussion point: /usr/lib/passwd

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 13:25 +, Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > can you use an actual chroot ? > > Calling chroot tends to imply running code from the target system. I'd > prefer to avoid that by default. In practice some things are going

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On 04/30/2014 04:28 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > If you are right, this is an argument for rpm collections, which we've > had for ages now and should really start using. YES! Getting rid of the copy-pasted rpm scriptlets would be a huge win. They are error prone and require huge effort to get them r

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-04-30)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '20

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On 04/30/2014 10:28 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:05 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > >> I suspect just dropping the deps would break initial installations, e.g. >> anaconda / livecd-creator. RPM uses the deps to order the transaction so >> that systemd gets installed first, and t

[perl-qpid_proton/f20: 8/8] Merge branch 'f20'

commit b94220d367838d49f66b4995ec422414f6b5ad7b Merge: f8e2dec 91ae5ef Author: Darryl L. Pierce Date: Wed Apr 30 10:36:02 2014 -0400 Merge branch 'f20' perl-qpid_proton.spec |9 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedorap

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Wayland

- Original Message - > Hi! > > Jaroslav Reznik wrote on 29.04.2014 14:04: > > > > Port the GNOME desktop to Wayland. > > Sorry, but what is actually proposed here? The above sentence for me > doesn't make any sense(¹), as Gnome 3.12 is able to run on Wayland > already (not perfectly, but

[perl-qpid_proton/f20] (8 commits) ...Merge branch 'f20'

Summary of changes: a0427c5... Changed the qpid-proton dependency to qpid-proton-c. (*) 8cb9c27... Rebased on Proton 0.5. (*) 0481900... Added the specific Perl provides for Proton. (*) 9c5b0f5... Rebased on Qpid Proton 0.6. (*) ca5acb9... Merge branch 'f20' into f19 (*) 91ae5ef... Mer

Re: Headsup: Ruby 2.1, Rubygems 2.2, Ruby on Rails 4.1 and Minitest 5.x in Rawhide

Dne 30.4.2014 15:46, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Hi All, During the last few days, we've been preparing a rebase to Ruby 2.1 in f21-ruby sidetag and it was just merged back to Rawhide. This rebase involves libruby soname bump. Updated Ruby carries RubyGems 2.2. We've tried to rebuilt all binary p

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:05 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > I suspect just dropping the deps would break initial installations, e.g. > anaconda / livecd-creator. RPM uses the deps to order the transaction so > that systemd gets installed first, and the packages that ship service > files get installed

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 16:05:37 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: I suspect just dropping the deps would break initial installations, e.g. anaconda / livecd-creator. RPM uses the deps to order the transaction so that systemd gets installed first, and the packages that ship service files get install

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On 04/30/2014 10:05 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 04/29/2014 12:31 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Mon, 28.04.14 15:11, Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) wrote: >> >>> On Apr 28, 2014 5:01 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" wrote: The problem is lots of services require systemd because they ship a

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On 04/29/2014 12:31 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 28.04.14 15:11, Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> On Apr 28, 2014 5:01 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" wrote: >>> >>> The problem is lots of services require systemd because they ship a >>> unit file and want systemctl reload to hap

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Wayland

Hi! Jaroslav Reznik wrote on 29.04.2014 14:04: > > Port the GNOME desktop to Wayland. Sorry, but what is actually proposed here? The above sentence for me doesn't make any sense(¹), as Gnome 3.12 is able to run on Wayland already (not perfectly, but it works afaik), so it was ported already I'd

Re: EPEL RFC: Strategy for python3 versions

I wonder if the softwarecollections.org repos might be a better choice for this. All the userspace tools already exist in 5, 6 and 7. Pat On 04/29/2014 08:22 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/29/2014 05:54 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Hi guys, Ori

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On 04/30/2014 01:44 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: I agree, where do I open a bugzilla to make this happen? rpm? Distro? Systemd? Dont you need to first file a change with FPC to the packaging guideline then file bug against every component that has that Require, then provide patches that remov

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: 389-ds-base #348

See -- Started by an SCM change Building remotely on Fedora20 in workspace Wiping out workspace first. Cloning the remote Git reposito

Headsup: Ruby 2.1, Rubygems 2.2, Ruby on Rails 4.1 and Minitest 5.x in Rawhide

Hi All, During the last few days, we've been preparing a rebase to Ruby 2.1 in f21-ruby sidetag and it was just merged back to Rawhide. This rebase involves libruby soname bump. Updated Ruby carries RubyGems 2.2. We've tried to rebuilt all binary packages, but some remaining - which were eit

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On 04/29/2014 05:47 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Em 29-04-2014 18:27, Martin Langhoff escreveu: >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Reindl Harald > > wrote: >> >> defense in depth means limit the attack surface as much as you can >> >> >> As folks are try

Re: fedora-atomic discussion point: /usr/lib/passwd

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: can you use an actual chroot ? Calling chroot tends to imply running code from the target system. I'd prefer to avoid that by default. In practice some things are going to require it, but the more we can avoid it, the better. I am not

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 08:49 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On tis, 2014-04-29 at 11:24 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 17:15 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > On tis, 2014-04-29 at 14:15 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > > = Proposed System Wide Change: Default Local DN

F21 Self Contained Change: MariaDB 10.0

= Proposed Self Contained Change: MariaDB 10.0 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MariaDB10 Change owner(s): Jakub Dorňák Update MariaDB to version 10.0 == Detailed Description == MariaDB 10.0 is the current stable (GA) release of MariaDB. It is built on the MariaDB 5.5 series with bac

F21 Self Contained Change: The Shogun Machine Learning Toolbox

= Proposed Self Contained Change: The Shogun Machine Learning Toolbox = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/shogun Change owner(s): Björn Esser SHOGUN is a large Scale Machine Learning Toolbox, being implemented in C++ and offering interfaces to C#, Java, Lua, Octave, Perl, Python, R and Ru

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.26.0 at 12th of May. There are several API changes. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.26.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6798518 and here: h

Re: kernel packaging split up landing in Rawhide

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 07:56:29 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: Nothing at the moment. Later this week I'm going to look at enabling auto-provides for kernel modules in the various kernel packages. This will make situations like this much more flexible, as gfs2-utils will be able to Requires: gfs

Re: Python 3.4 to rawhide

On 04/30/2014 12:22 PM, Matej Stuchlik wrote: > Good day folks, > Python 3.4 is now [ready and tagged] in f21-python, so I'd like to ask you > to make whatever modifications that may be necessary and [rebuild] your > Python packages into the tag. Once we have sufficient fraction up and running, > w

Re: kernel packaging split up landing in Rawhide

Am 29.04.2014 23:41, schrieb Josh Boyer: > As part of the F21 "Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud" Feature[1], > I've committed and pushed the kernel packaging split up into > kernel-core and kernel-drivers subpackages. For those of you running > rawhide, this really shouldn't be a major impact a

Re: kernel packaging split up landing in Rawhide

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > > On 29/04/14 22:41, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> As part of the F21 "Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud" Feature[1], >> I've committed and pushed the kernel packaging split up into >> kernel-core and kernel-drivers subpa

Re: Deprecate setjmp/longjmp? [was Re: Maybe it's time to get rid of tcpwrappers/tcpd?]

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 04/28/2014 09:52 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > > setjmp and longjmp are tools, that one may use in a good or bad way. >> Along the same lines one could argue for dropping programs that use goto >> in Fedora (because everyone know

Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj

On 04/07/2014 07:29 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: As of JDK8, OpenJDK can be cross-compiled. Not before time, either. It seems to me that support is fairly limited—you cannot compile Hotspot across different operating systems, but perhaps across CPU architectures. In the context of GCJ obsolesce

Re: We want to stop systemd from being added to docker images, because of rpm requiring systemctl.

On Tue, 29.04.14 15:36, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner (marcelo.leit...@gmail.com) wrote: > Em 29-04-2014 12:27, Lennart Poettering escreveu: > >On Tue, 29.04.14 10:37, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > >> > >>On 04/29/2014 06:33 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >>>On Mon, 28.04.14 17:01, D

Python 3.4 to rawhide

Good day folks, Python 3.4 is now [ready and tagged] in f21-python, so I'd like to ask you to make whatever modifications that may be necessary and [rebuild] your Python packages into the tag. Once we have sufficient fraction up and running, we'll merge with rawhide. Note that your spec file may r

[perl-PerlIO-via-Timeout/epel7] Initial import (#1080952).

Summary of changes: 5f602f7... Initial import (#1080952). (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproj

Re: kernel packaging split up landing in Rawhide

Hi, On 29/04/14 22:41, Josh Boyer wrote: Hi All, As part of the F21 "Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud" Feature[1], I've committed and pushed the kernel packaging split up into kernel-core and kernel-drivers subpackages. For those of you running rawhide, this really shouldn't be a major impac

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: LVM Cache Logical Volumes

- Original Message - > Hello, > 2014-04-29 14:48 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik < jrez...@redhat.com > : > > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: LVM Cache Logical Volumes = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Cache_Logical_Volumes > > > * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Wayland

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 14:04 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >> GNOME is being ported to Wayland. In particular GNOME shell is changed to run >> as a Wayland compositor instead of an X11 compositor. > > Does that mean that the shell will stop w