On 07/02/15 at 09:48am, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 07/01/15 at 09:08am, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> >> > Pratyush,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the effort, let's cc Fedora devel list, see if we ca
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Which “that”? The file (with a different URL) or the bad URL itself (to
> make it not bad)?
'That' should be 'that 404 problem'.
>> or disable that screenshot for a while(make sure there are still other shots)
>
> Any file change would be
On 07/03/2015 06:45 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Subject pretty much says it all...
>>
>> I have an appdata file from upstream that I think has a bad screenshot URL,
>> how do I test this?
>
> You can either ask upstream to fix that,
Which
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Subject pretty much says it all...
>
> I have an appdata file from upstream that I think has a bad screenshot URL,
> how do I test this?
You can either ask upstream to fix that, or disable that screenshot
for a while(make sure there are still
Subject pretty much says it all...
I have an appdata file from upstream that I think has a bad screenshot URL,
how do I test this?
I tried changing the file installed by the package but of course it didn't
do much.
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
On 04/08/2015 12:46 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>
> I look at tl2pm and think "it would be fairly easy to patch that to
> spit out 4000 and something spec files rather than one 16 MB one". The
> unresolved issues are whether doing that would invalidate the previous
> license audit (it shouldn't
On 04/08/2015 02:12 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> One reason I'm building my OSJourno Docker images on Fedora and not
> the more popular and theoretically more stable CentOS is that EPEL
> doesn't have a few LaTeX packages I need. Sometime when I run out of
> more pressing things to fix, I'm
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 01:47:11PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> The longstanding FTBFS thing is harder. In principle we do actually
> retire things that haven't built for multiple releases; in practice,
> things apparently get missed. pathfinder logiweb and python-rpi-gpio,
> for example, were a
Are there any Intel Haswell users with Chromium running having similar issues?
On 2 July 2015 at 09:35, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> This album shows how badly this affects productivity when using Fedora
> as your main workstation:
> https://goo.gl/photos/d2EAXWTZQRVMsSSPA
--
devel mailing
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 14:59 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> First, there's no way to let a "good enough" package in and have it
> progress to excellent — it must be excellent at the start, because we
> generally don't trust the package quality to do much but go down.
This is actually something I'd
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:49:37AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to gather
> some statistics on the actual impact: what the most impacted packages
> and apps are, what the typical overhead is like, etc. The results
> are... unpleasant, but
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 01:47:11PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > I agree. What can and should we do about it?
> Good question. I'm not entirely sure, but I have opinions.
That's a good start... we can build from there in to plans.
> The binaries-in-/usr/share/doc thing is the sort of clearly o
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:49:37AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Beyond that, the fact that we have such blatant packaging errors, and
> > that nearly 4% of our binary packages haven't rebuilt in F23, is quite
> > worrisome.
>
> I agree.
HI
I have intention to orphaning apache-poi [1] ,
because, it, for build, use resources with unknow license [2].
I tried to contact several time the developer/s [3] of these files but
without succes.
regards
gil
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/apache-poi/
[2] https://bugzilla.r
On 2 July 2015 at 16:55, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 16:24 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> On 2 July 2015 at 15:49, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to gather
>> > some statistics on the actual impact: what the most impacted
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:56 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Stephen Gallagher <
> sgall...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 10:33 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:55 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> > > > * AGREED: Netizen is not a
I just took over maintainership of libax25 and ax25-tools and I am working
on an update.
The update is only from rc2 to rc4 but abi-compliance checker shows it as
an incompatible update:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34775202/compat_reports/libax25/0.0.12.rc2_to_0.0.12.rc4/compat_report.htm
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 16:38 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> this type of attitude?
>
> everybody who reads IT news over the past years about CA's issued
> certificates even for Google knows that a CA signed certificate does
> not
> prove anything - the real problem is wehn this happens for Google
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 10:33 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:55 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
>> > * AGREED: Netizen is not approved as spin. We approve the option
>> > to
>> > have netizen as optional suite in
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 16:24 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 2 July 2015 at 15:49, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to gather
> > some statistics on the actual impact: what the most impacted packages
> > and apps are, what the typical overhea
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 10:33 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:55 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> > * AGREED: Netizen is not approved as spin. We approve the option
> > to
> > have netizen as optional suite in anaconda. Please work with
> > Workstation WG. (+7, 0, -0)
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:55 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> * AGREED: Netizen is not approved as spin. We approve the option to
> have netizen as optional suite in anaconda. Please work with
> Workstation WG. (+7, 0, -0) (thozza, 18:48:50)
Hi, maybe there was some misunderstanding about the
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 21:33 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I haven't gone through all the requirements but it seems pretty clear
> that brasero is unmaintained.
FWIW, it's unmaintained upstream as well. If anyone is looking for a
GNOME package to take care of
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
On 2 July 2015 at 15:49, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to gather
> some statistics on the actual impact: what the most impacted packages
> and apps are, what the typical overhead is like, etc. The results
> are... unpleasant,
[snip]
Impressive
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:49:37AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Beyond that, the fact that we have such blatant packaging errors, and
> that nearly 4% of our binary packages haven't rebuilt in F23, is quite
> worrisome.
I agree. What can and should we do about it?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Proje
Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to gather
some statistics on the actual impact: what the most impacted packages
and apps are, what the typical overhead is like, etc. The results
are... unpleasant, but not so much because of the hardening change
itself. I started by grabb
In any case, this is drifting significantly off-topic. Anyone
interested in continuing it further, please use other venues.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
- Original Message -
> *lol* and with a CA certificate you can?
A lot of us are sick of this type of attitude on fedora-devel, to
the point where we don't actually care what you think anymore. Take
this as an opportunity to read instead of jumping at people's throat
with an attitude tha
Am 02.07.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
- Original Message -
*lol* and with a CA certificate you can?
A lot of us are sick of this type of attitude on fedora-devel, to
the point where we don't actually care what you think anymore. Take
this as an opportunity to read instead o
I will update a belated bump of armadillo (that happened in May) in rawhide.
# dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires
'libarmadillo.so.4()(64bit)'
armadillo-devel-0:4.650.2-3.fc23.x86_64
gdal-0:1.11.2-10.fc23.x86_64
gdal-java-0:1.11.2-10.fc23.x86_64
gdal-libs-0:1.11.2-1
Am 02.07.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 02.07.2015 um 16:04 schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 02.07.2015 um 02:30 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:59 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Principles are good and well. But how many t
Am 02.07.2015 um 16:04 schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.07.2015 um 02:30 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:59 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Principles are good and well. But how many times did you actually USE
that option you so r
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 04:04:37PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> > a self signed certificate is exactly as secure as a CA certificate you pay
> > for after there are hundrets and thousands by default trusted CA's in the
> > browsers with the only difference you have to accept it once
> No its not. Becaus
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 02.07.2015 um 02:30 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
>>
>> On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:59 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>>
>>> Principles are good and well. But how many times did you actually USE
>>> that option you so reluctantly implemented? :)
>
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-07-02)
==
Meeting started by hhorak at 12:02:14 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2015-07-02/env-and-stacks.2015-
Hello,
As suggested in the packaging guide [0], I'm here to introduce myself! I'm Jie,
currently working as a software engineering intern on the Java team at RedHat.
Most of my work is on Thermostat [1], a instrumentation tool for the Hotspot
JVM and Icedtea-Web [2], a browser plugin for Java a
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> I agree , ask him that, please , he gave me commit permissions on
> packages gammu and wammu a while ago ...
Just got a response from him overnight and he said he'd take a look at my
bug.
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
On Seg, 2015-06-29 at 13:47 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 29/06/15 12:00, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >> Greetings, all!
> >>
> >> The elections for FESCo - June 2015 have concluded, and the results
> >> are shown below.
> >>
> >> FESCo is electing
Compose started at Thu Jul 2 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[airsched]
airsched-1.00.0-12.fc23.i686 requires libzmq.so.4
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
- Original Message -
> Il giorno mar, 30/06/2015 alle 06.13 -0400, Bastien Nocera ha scritto:
> > It doesn't need updating, the error you're seeing is:
> > "DMA: Out of SW-IOMMU space for 65536 bytes at device :09:00.1"
> >
> > Which I reported upstream here:
> > http://thread.gmane.
- Original Message -
> From: "Miroslav Suchý"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 11:30:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Mass bug filing proposal - switching to Python3
>
> Dne 1.7.2015 v 15:33 Robert Kuska napsal(a):
> > I would like to start with Mass bug filing proce
For rubygem-apipie-rails-0.3.4-1.fc23, the license was changed from
MIT and ASL 2.0 and (MIT or GPLv2)
to
MIT and ASL 2.0
since the bundled jQuery was replaced by symlink to the system version
of jQuery.
Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 11:03:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Mass bug filing proposal - switching to Python3
>
> Dne 1.7.2015 v 15:33 Robert Kuska napsal(a):
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I would like to start with
A bit late announce, sorry for that, but I was offline for couple of days.
WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston,
21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
= Topics =
* New meeting time?
* Elections wrap-up
* Changes in governance
* Fedora use
Dne 1.7.2015 v 15:33 Robert Kuska napsal(a):
> I would like to start with Mass bug filing process and as stated
> at wiki, the first step is to gain consensus for what I want to make.
I maintain several python applications, but not all python libraries are
available for python3 yet.
Just few week
Dne 1.7.2015 v 15:33 Robert Kuska napsal(a):
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to start with Mass bug filing process and as stated
> at wiki, the first step is to gain consensus for what I want to make.
>
> Note please that this mass bug filing is conditioned with acceptance of
> 'Python3 as defau
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 07/01/15 at 09:08am, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Dave Young wrote:
>> > Pratyush,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the effort, let's cc Fedora devel list, see if we can get help
>> > from Fedora experts.
>> >
>> > Summary the
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-07-01)
===
Meeting started by thozza at 18:01:35 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-07-01/fesco.2015-07-01-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
This album shows how badly this affects productivity when using Fedora
as your main workstation:
https://goo.gl/photos/d2EAXWTZQRVMsSSPA
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-
49 matches
Mail list logo
