Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

On 2018-07-12, Mohan Boddu wrote: > Things got fixed quicker than expected. The issues related to binutils > is fixed with binutils-2.30.90-3.fc29 build. > Taskotron reports on SDL rebuild

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

Hi. As I see rebuild failed for all packages use %{__python} macro because it point to /usr/bin/python that removed from python2 package. Need MassFix all these packages. Many of them not updated very long time. -- Vasiliy пт, 13 июл. 2018 г. в 11:30, Petr Pisar : > On 2018-07-12, Mohan Boddu

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

On 13.7.2018 10:38, Vascom wrote: Hi. As I see rebuild failed for all packages use %{__python} macro because it point to /usr/bin/python that removed from python2 package. Need MassFix all these packages. Many of them not updated very long time. Please, only fix yours or those you care about

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On 8.7.2018 20:46, Igor Gnatenko wrote: As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot , I'm going to automatically add BuildRequires: gcc and/or BuildRequires: gcc-c++ to packages which fail to build with common messages (like gcc: c

Re: OCaml 4.07.0 is now in Fedora 29

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 08:33:27PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 9:14 AM Jerry James wrote: > > If I can, I will put my WIP mojo-executor, > > string-template-maven-plugin, and antlr4 packages somewhere online so > > any motivated souls can look at them while I am gone. One

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 11:19 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 8.7.2018 20:46, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot > > , I'm > > going to automatically add BuildRequires: gcc and/or BuildRequires: > > gcc-c++ to

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:39:55PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 11:19 Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 8.7.2018 20:46, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot > > > , I'm > > > going to a

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On 13.7.2018 12:39, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 11:19 Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 8.7.2018 20:46, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot > , I'm

Intend to retire python-openstack-nose-plugin

Hello, the subject says it, I'm intending to retire python-openstack-nose-plugin. It is old, very old. Last commit upstream was 2012. Any takers, otherwise I'd retire it in a week. Matthias -- Matthias Runge ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedor

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On 07/12/2018 10:17 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:10:37PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> On 07/11/2018 04:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On 07/11/2018 12:57 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 07/11/2018 09:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I don't see the cache=unsafe any

fsck error creating live cd

Hi, I was trying to build a live cd with livecd-creator and towards the latter part of the process I encountered the following error, Checking filesystem /var/tmp/imgcreate-230i9kyl/tmp-fjf6k6vu/ext3fs.img resizing /var/tmp/imgcreate-230i9kyl/tmp-fjf6k6vu/ext3fs.img Checking filesystem /var/tmp/i

Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: > I've clicked randomly trough failures during the mass rebuild at [1]. > > I see quite a lot of commands not founds for gcc, cc, c++... > > I think the maintainers should add them and that's fine, but it seemed that > during this change you said you will

Updating Brotli to 1.0.5 in Rawhide

Since nobody complained, I decided to push the update. if you need to rebuild anything that depends on it, you might need to do so -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links:

Re: Removal of GCC from the buildroot

> "RPH" == R P Herrold writes: RPH> This list seems to only cover packages starting with an uppercase RPH> letter, or a letter before lowercase 'i' Well, the list is incomplete because the mass rebuild is not complete. Upper case letters and digits were submitted first. Currently packages i

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

> On Jul 12, 2018, at 4:26 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > >> On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 07:32 +, Petr Pisar wrote: >>> On 2018-07-11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> The effects of fsync are impossible to see unless you hard-reboot >>> the >>> machine. >> >> Are you sure non-fsynced changes are ar

Self Introduction: Chris/BunnyApocalypse

Hello all, I'm Chris King, and on the internet I go by BunnyApocalypse, a name which I created in 6th grade, and has stuck with me ever since. I am a foss enthusiast and have been using Linux as my daily driver for a few years now, although I only recently switched to Fedora. I don't have any ma

Re: Updating Brotli to 1.0.5 in Rawhide

I wanted to point out that because libcurl now depends on brotli [1], nearly every package in the distribution indirectly depends on brotli. So repoquery --whatreqires brotli --recursive gives me 57775 packages. If anyone feels up to it, I'm sure our friend pouar might like to have a comaintainer

Re: Updating Brotli to 1.0.5 in Rawhide

On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 15:20 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I wanted to point out that because libcurl now depends on brotli [1], > nearly every package in the distribution indirectly depends on > brotli. So repoquery --whatreqires brotli --recursive gives me 57775 > packages. > > If anyone

Re: Packages which use the BuildRoot: directive

On 07/11/2018 03:38 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Kevin Fenzi [11/07/2018 12:47] : >> >> Barring that, I think we will just continue to have people make changes >> and them get overwritten. > > Does this include changes that were made for security reasons (disabling > a compile-time option, doing

Re: Packages which use the BuildRoot: directive

On 07/12/2018 07:45 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > I second that. When we mass filled PRs with python2 related changes it > was always a Red Hat maintained software, where people were basically > telling us: "no, we won't accept your PR here, we maintain the specfile > somewhere else". It was very unpl

Re: Packages which use the BuildRoot: directive

On 07/12/2018 10:24 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Ben Rosser wrote: >> We have been telling people for a while now that they don't "own" >> their packages. Making it easier for people to maintain their packages >> outside of dist-git and (effectively) ignore changes fro

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On 07/12/2018 01:15 AM, Daniel Mach wrote: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On 06/27/2018 03:18 AM, Lubomír Sedlář wrote: >>> Removing Yyum would mean that there will no longer be /usr/bin/pungi >>> available in Fedora. This is not a problem for any work done by release >

Re: GCC 8/9 ABI change: call for rebuilds

On Tuesday, July 10 2018, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 15:31 -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: >> Recently a serious bug in the compiler was discovered whereby we miscompiled >> several packages. The problem only occurs in C++ programs that contain a >> class >> with a trivial move co

[Test-Announce] 2018-07-16 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2018-07-16 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! We didn't meet last week, and there are Interesting Times going on in Rawhide (and I think Test Day l

[Test-Announce] 2018-07-16 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 29 Blocker Review Meeting

# F29 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2018-07-16 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Beta blockers to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday. If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted b