>> Power users can always add *.h back to C types but I think having it in
>> C++ is a better default.
>>
>
> Yes you're only changing the default. I just stated my opionion and won't
> try to block the change. Go a head if you prefer.
Agree, I shouldn't be defending C programmers over C++
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 06.01.2016 um 21:12 schrieb Jiří Techet:
>
>>
>>
>> It's indeed at least interesting to consider, because at least for .h
>> headers there really is some mixed stuff all over the place -- even,
>> simply
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 8 January 2016 at 08:00, Jiří Techet wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Thomas Martitz
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 06.01.2016 um 21:12 schrieb Jiří Techet:
> >>>
> >>>
>
Am 07.01.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Jiří Techet:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Thomas Martitz > wrote:
Am 06.01.2016 um 21:12 schrieb Jiří Techet:
It's indeed at least interesting to consider, because at
least for .h
On 2016-01-06 12:23 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 06.01.2016 um 21:12 schrieb Jiří Techet:
It's indeed at least interesting to consider, because at least for .h
headers there really is some mixed stuff all over the place -- even,
simply look in Scintilla's source tree.
+1 for
Am 06.01.2016 um 21:12 schrieb Jiří Techet:
It's indeed at least interesting to consider, because at least for .h
headers there really is some mixed stuff all over the place -- even,
simply look in Scintilla's source tree.
+1 for having the headers parsed/lexed by the C++ parser
Oops, forgot the [1]
> However, it being for build commands [1], or default extension, etc.,
> I'm not sure having one single "C and C++ headers and sources" is a
> great idea.
[1] I mostly agree stock build commands are seldom (if ever) useful with
C and C++, but for the most basic "Hello
On 2015-12-29 3:24 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
My only comment is to add to the point that the build commands are
different. For example C that uses "template" as a variable won't
compile with C++, a trap for beginners or existing code (just like
Geany used to have).
It's probably best that
I'm not sure about the combination, would have to examine it further.
My only comment is to add to the point that the build commands are
different. For example C that uses "template" as a variable won't
compile with C++, a trap for beginners or existing code (just like
Geany used to have).
But I
On 29 December 2015 at 21:48, Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 2015-12-29 3:24 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
>>
>> My only comment is to add to the point that the build commands are
>> different. For example C that uses "template" as a variable won't
>> compile with C++, a trap for
10 matches
Mail list logo