--- On Mon, 5/7/12, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> From: Martin Langhoff
> Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools
> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis"
> Cc: "Peter Robinson" , "OLPC Devel"
>
> Date: Monday, May 7, 2012, 3:51 PM
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:29 PM,
> Yioryos Asprobounitis
>
> wrote:
> > So, the
Saw this at Ubuntu UDS-Q today: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OHW Might be
of some use?
cheers,
Sameer
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Hi,
For the next 12.1.0 build I've just enabled the XO-1.75 serial console
by default in the kernel config.
We had disabled this earlier as we had linked it to suspend/resume
crashes, but we now believe that link to have been broken.
Enabling it again now should give us some good testing before t
On 08/05/12 07:51, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
wrote:
So, the 3.3.4 headers are fine for the 3.0.19 kernel?
Yes for building userland stuff. Not for building kernel modules.
We aren't currently building kernel headers package splitoff. We sho
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> However, /dev/usb/lego0 is not created. The corresponding udev rule is
> installed by Fedora's "nqc" rpm, but it relies on the "legousbtower" kernel
> module.
>
> Am I doing something wrong, or is it really just that the OLPC kernel is
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
wrote:
> So, the 3.3.4 headers are fine for the 3.0.19 kernel?
Yes for building userland stuff. Not for building kernel modules.
We aren't currently building kernel headers package splitoff. We should :-/
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
So, the 3.3.4 headers are fine for the 3.0.19 kernel?
Thx again
--- On Mon, 5/7/12, Peter Robinson wrote:
> From: Peter Robinson
> Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools
> To: "Martin Langhoff"
> Cc: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" , "OLPC Devel"
>
> Date: Monday, May 7, 2012, 2:12 PM
> On Mon, May 7, 201
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
> wrote:
>> groupinstall'ed "Development Tools" on 21009o2 and noticed 2 things.
>> Kernel-devel is 3.0.19_xo... but kernel-headers is 3.3.4-3.f17.
>> gcc-4.7.0-4 is an unsigned rpm.
>>
bert wrote:
>
> On 07.05.2012, at 18:19, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > bert wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to connect a LEGO RCX via the RCX 2.0 USB Tower. When plugging
> >> it
> >> in, it gets listed with name and vendor in the messages log.
> >>
> >> However, /dev/usb/lego0 is no
On 07.05.2012, at 18:19, Paul Fox wrote:
> bert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to connect a LEGO RCX via the RCX 2.0 USB Tower. When plugging it
>> in, it gets listed with name and vendor in the messages log.
>>
>> However, /dev/usb/lego0 is not created. The corresponding udev rule is
>> ins
bert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to connect a LEGO RCX via the RCX 2.0 USB Tower. When plugging it
> in, it gets listed with name and vendor in the messages log.
>
> However, /dev/usb/lego0 is not created. The corresponding udev rule is
> installed by Fedora's "nqc" rpm, but it relies o
Hi,
I'm trying to connect a LEGO RCX via the RCX 2.0 USB Tower. When plugging it
in, it gets listed with name and vendor in the messages log.
However, /dev/usb/lego0 is not created. The corresponding udev rule is
installed by Fedora's "nqc" rpm, but it relies on the "legousbtower" kernel
modu
2012/5/6 Manuel Quiñones :
> 2012/5/5 Peter Robinson :
>> The "Yes yes lets try that again..without the oops" release.
>>
>> THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE
>>
>> Fixed bugs:
>> #11806 Browse: step scroll with the XO arrow keys in hand-held mode
>> #11766 systemd doesn't remount / RO on shutdown
>>
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Thirdly, fsck is not magic. It cannot detect/repair all corruption. As
> far as I know, we have not yet found a case of corruption which can be
> meaningfully fixed by fsck. We did do quite a bit of testing for this
> at an earlier point.
It i
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
wrote:
> groupinstall'ed "Development Tools" on 21009o2 and noticed 2 things.
> Kernel-devel is 3.0.19_xo... but kernel-headers is 3.3.4-3.f17.
> gcc-4.7.0-4 is an unsigned rpm.
> Are these expected and OK to go on?
Yeah, I think all ARM rpms
groupinstall'ed "Development Tools" on 21009o2 and noticed 2 things.
Kernel-devel is 3.0.19_xo... but kernel-headers is 3.3.4-3.f17.
gcc-4.7.0-4 is an unsigned rpm.
Are these expected and OK to go on?
Thx
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
htt
Hi,
I spent most of Friday and another 4 hours on Saturday working on the
arm-3.3 audio issue. The problem is that only silence is produced.
>From what I can see the core of the problem is that the "DAPM"
(dynamic audio power management) code is passed a representation of
the widgets (amps, muxes
On May 6, 2012, at 11:59 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> Installed 21009o2.zd in 2 XO-1.75 and on the one the fs failed to expand.
> fdisk shows that the card is indeed 4GB and OFW warns in red writing that the
> image is smaller than the device.
I saw the exact same behavior with 21009o2.zd
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:41 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> Capture the kernel dmesg output after boot. Daniel added some
> additional debugging lines to the resize logic, and these, if my
> memory serves me, go into the kernel message log.
>
> Capture the dmesg output, check that the filesystem has n
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:59:39PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> Installed 21009o2.zd in 2 XO-1.75 and on the one the fs failed to
> expand. fdisk shows that the card is indeed 4GB and OFW warns in red
> writing that the image is smaller than the device.
Indeed, the Open Firmware warning i
Installed 21009o2.zd in 2 XO-1.75 and on the one the fs failed to expand. fdisk
shows that the card is indeed 4GB and OFW warns in red writing that the image
is smaller than the device.
Anything I should be looking for specifically before I retry or after, if this
repeats?
__
21 matches
Mail list logo