Gilles,
The strange configure check comes from this commit
https://github.com/open-mpi/hwloc/commit/6a9299ce9d1cb1c13b3b346fe6fdfed2df75c672
Are you sure your patch won't break something else?
I'll ask Pavan what he thinks about your patch.
I agree that it's crazy we don't find strncasecmp on som
Brice,
the goal of the test is to check whether a function declaration is
already present
in one of the header.
in order to achieve this, the test will redeclare the function with an
absurd prototype :
strncasecmp(int,long,int,long,int,long,int,long,int,long);
/* by the way, there is no prototyp
Folks,
Since r32672 (trunk), grpcomm/rcd is the default module.
the attached spawn.c test program is a trimmed version of the
spawn_with_env_vars.c test case
from the ibm test suite.
when invoked on two nodes :
- the program hangs with -np 2
- the program can crash with np > 2
error message is
[n
Yeah, that's not the correct fix. The right way to fix it is for all three
components to have their own RML tag, and for each of them to establish a
persistent receive. They then can use the signature to tell which collective
the incoming message belongs to.
I'll fix it, but it won't be until t
WHAT: Generate an error if the user provides duplicate MCA params on the
cmd line
WHY: User confusion due to unexpected behavior
WHEN: Tues, Sept 16 as this is a gating issue for 1.8.3 release
In the beginning, OMPI would look at a cmd line for MCA params - if a param was
listed
As part of our migration to Github, there are three main things to convert:
1. SVN -> Git
2. Trac wiki -> Github markdown
3. Track tickets -> Github issues
I have a good automated solution for #1; that can be run whenever we're ready
to switchover.
I used an 80% automated solution for #2 (i.e.,
maybe we should have another MCA parameter to specify desired policy?
LAST,CONCAT,FIRST and let user select it?
basically, it is to mimic "setenv(var,val,overwrite)" behavior which is
easy to explain and good to have.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> WHAT: Generate an
This is a fantastically useful flow chart:
http://justinhileman.info/article/git-pretty/
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
I can't see how a user would know how to use such a thing - which mca params
can absorb a concatenated value? Why would you take the last vs the first
instead of just providing a value only once?
On Sep 9, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Mike Dubman wrote:
> maybe we should have another MCA parameter to s
On Sep 9, 2014, at 1:42 PM, Mike Dubman wrote:
> maybe we should have another MCA parameter to specify desired policy?
> LAST,CONCAT,FIRST and let user select it?
>
> basically, it is to mimic "setenv(var,val,overwrite)" behavior which is easy
> to explain and good to have.
Is there a use cas
10 matches
Mail list logo