Hi,
I found a broken link in the source builder documentation:
https://docs.rtems.org/rsb/#_windows
The ready to go windows tools link doesn't work.
Hope this helps,
Mohammed Khoory
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
Hi
I am sending this email because Joel told us, participants of ESA SOCIS
2015, to submit our work to devel@RTEMS for evaluation.
In this summer of code I was supposed to add a fault injection tool work
with RTEMS. I've selected two tools for this purpose:
- GRINDER
Do we still have two versions of the untar code?
This looks good to commit.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> ---
> cpukit/libmisc/untar/untar.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/untar/untar.c
The problem exists for both RTEMS untar implementations and their
variants: Untar_FromMemory(), Untar_FromFile() and rtems_tarfs_load().
---
cpukit/libfs/src/imfs/imfs_load_tar.c | 12 +++-
cpukit/libmisc/untar/untar.c | 18 +-
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2
El 9/9/2015 16:14, "Gedare Bloom" escribió:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
> > Hello Martin,
> >
> > - Martin Galvan schrieb:
> >> Hi there! We were looking at the RTEMS
On 9/9/2015 5:27 PM, Daniel Gutson wrote:
El 9/9/2015 16:14, "Gedare Bloom" >
escribió:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Sebastian Huber
> > wrote:
> > Hello
Looks good. This should go on 4.11 and master? Someone can commit.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> The problem exists for both RTEMS untar implementations and their
> variants: Untar_FromMemory(), Untar_FromFile() and rtems_tarfs_load().
> ---
>
Hello Martin,
- Martin Galvan schrieb:
> Hi there! We were looking at the RTEMS SMP support, and wondered what
> would it take for the system to support some form of memory protection
> (say, an MPU). Is it possible, and if so, how hard would it be?
the
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> - Martin Galvan schrieb:
>> Hi there! We were looking at the RTEMS SMP support, and wondered what
>> would it take for the system to support
Hi there! We were looking at the RTEMS SMP support, and wondered what
would it take for the system to support some form of memory protection
(say, an MPU). Is it possible, and if so, how hard would it be?
We also saw this:
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Projects/MMU_Support
What's the status of
Hello Gedare,
On Wednesday 09 of September 2015 17:05:43 Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Do we still have two versions of the untar code?
There is another implementation which is IMFS specific.
It is invoked by function rtems_tarfs_load() located in
rtems/cpukit/libfs/src/imfs/imfs_load_tar.c
It is
11 matches
Mail list logo