Where I work, Di is very usable on both MS Windows and Linux.
We currently have only 2 significant usage issues:
1. No way to set default text properties. For text objects, the work-around
is easy. For objects with "text fields", like UML shapes, this is more work.
2. The UML Transition shape
I agree Steve.
Hans worked very hard to keep Dia like this. I can continue with the
current version of Dia - it is always available. If it strays too much and
it doesn't suit me I will simply stop using newer releases. Dia has
already lasted far longer than other programs I use for nearly 20
On 05/12/2018 18.32, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What's wrong with Dia just the way it is? It works. It's exportable
> into Inkscape for conversion to SVG.
Hi, all,
Though I like Dia (*), there are (many) places where it's sorely
lacking. My biggest peeves are:
* Shapes rotation - you
Greetings, Steve Litt!
> What's wrong with Dia just the way it is? It works. It's exportable
> into Inkscape for conversion to SVG.
"It works" is the most you can say about it.
When you start to actually USE it, you immediately discover different small
annoyances, the more - the deeper you
Le 5 décembre 2018 18:32:47 GMT+01:00, Steve Litt a
écrit :
>What's wrong with Dia just the way it is? It works. It's exportable
>into Inkscape for conversion to SVG.
Good point, but that also means to repeatidly rewrites by hand the diagram
shapes and so on.
An UNIX way would be to
+1 (from an occasional user)
On Wednesday, December 05, 2018 12:32:47 PM Steve Litt wrote:
> What's wrong with Dia just the way it is? It works. It's exportable
> into Inkscape for conversion to SVG.
>
> Sure, I have a few qualms with the way Dia works, mainly having to do
> with the
