[Issue 8020] New: std.stdio can't open UTF16 file names in Windows

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Summary: std.stdio can't open UTF16 file names in Windows Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priori

[Issue 8016] (Regression git) Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8016 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #1 from Don 2

[Issue 8020] std.stdio can't open UTF16 file names in Windows

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #

[Issue 8021] New: BigInt division bug

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8021 Summary: BigInt division bug Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos A

[Issue 5570] 64 bit C ABI not followed for passing structs and complex numbers as function parameters

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570 James Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ja...@aatch.net --- Comment #14 from Ja

[Issue 8022] New: BigInt division bug (2)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8022 Summary: BigInt division bug (2) Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #12 from deadalnix 2012-05-03 01:43:42 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > >The current specification is flawed. It have nothing to do with how > >inheritance work (and I could assure you I know what I'm talking about, and > >I'm

[Issue 8016] (Regression git) Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8016 --- Comment #2 from Don 2012-05-03 02:04:54 PDT --- Here's what happens. When parsing m2, it imports m1. The static assert forces it to run semantic on f(). This instantiates template t. t gets added to the list of instantiated templates *of mo

[Issue 7584] contract checking is too conservative for inherited contracts

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7584 --- Comment #7 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-05-03 02:20:30 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Out contracts are "anded" together, meaning that *all* out contracts must pass > in an inheritance hierarchy. Out contracts in overriding functions do n

[Issue 6296] ICE(glue.c): invalid template instantiated in is(typeof()).

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 4269] Regression(2.031): invalid type accepted if evaluated while errors are gagged

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||verylonglogin@gmail.com --- Comment #25 from

[Issue 7955] Nested function error in sort with lambda template but not with a lambda

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7955 Denis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||verylonglogin@gmail.com --- Comment #1 fro

[Issue 8016] (Regression git) Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8016 --- Comment #3 from Leandro Lucarella 2012-05-03 03:21:07 PDT --- > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/920 Looks like this test case is exposing more bugs than we were aware of! This pull request fixes the original problem I

[Issue 7917] [ICE] (toir.c 178) with nested function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7917 Denis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||verylonglogin@gmail.com --- Comment #8 fro

[Issue 7413] Vector literals don't work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7413 --- Comment #16 from Manu 2012-05-03 03:25:43 PDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > (In reply to comment #13) > > > (In reply to comment #12) > > > > (In reply to comment #11) > > > > > Haven't done the special case

[Issue 4432] DMD r575 won't build on Linux in debug mode: undefined reference to obj_long

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4432 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 8023] New: (Regression git) Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8023 Summary: (Regression git) Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved Product: D Version: D1 Platform: All OS/Version: All St

[Issue 8016] (Regression git) Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8016 --- Comment #4 from Leandro Lucarella 2012-05-03 03:45:02 PDT --- Added bug 8023. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 8016] (Regression git) Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8016 Leandro Lucarella changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|pull| Severity|regression

[Issue 7584] contract checking is too conservative for inherited contracts

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7584 --- Comment #8 from deadalnix 2012-05-03 04:18:22 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Out contracts are "anded" together, meaning that *all* out contracts must pass > in an inheritance hierarchy. Out contracts in overriding functions do not > ov

[Issue 8023] (Regression git) Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8023 --- Comment #1 from Leandro Lucarella 2012-05-03 04:22:06 PDT --- Add a test case for this bug. Even when is not reproducible in D2 right now, maybe is a good idea to have the test case anyway so it doesn't fail in the future as D1 does now.

[Issue 5499] ICE(toir.c): delegate as alias template parameter, only with -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5499 Leandro Lucarella changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leandro.lucarella@sociomant

[Issue 5499] ICE(toir.c): delegate as alias template parameter, only with -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5499 --- Comment #7 from Leandro Lucarella 2012-05-03 04:36:34 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Another simpler test case, or is this another bug? > > --- > void foo(alias f)() { > f(); > } > > void bar() { > foo!({})(); > } > > vo

[Issue 5499] ICE(toir.c): delegate as alias template parameter, only with -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5499 --- Comment #8 from Leandro Lucarella 2012-05-03 04:37:47 PDT --- But the testcases provided here compiles in current dmd2! -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail bec

[Issue 4504] ICE(toir.c) nested function passed by alias to nested member function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4504 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Version|D1 & D2

[Issue 5778] Missing attributes.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5778 Oleg Kuporosov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oleg.kuporo...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Issue 8020] std.stdio can't open UTF16 file names in Windows

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Kuporosov 2012-05-03 04:54:32 PDT --- Problem is Windows isn't supporting UTF8. So created file in some 3rd party app with UTF16 name will not match UTF8 name by std.stdio. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id

[Issue 8024] New: Template alias parameter is fail to compile when -inline is used

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8024 Summary: Template alias parameter is fail to compile when -inline is used Product: D Version: D1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: norma

[Issue 5499] ICE(toir.c): delegate as alias template parameter, only with -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5499 Leandro Lucarella changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||http://d.puremagic.com/issu

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #13 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2012-05-03 07:05:18 PDT --- I apologize but I still think the confusion goes the other way. A good way to arbiter this is to peruse the literature on the subject, as Walter suggested. If going through a

[Issue 8020] std.stdio can't open UTF16 file names in Windows

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Dmitry Olshansky changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmitry.o...@gmail.com --- Comment #

[Issue 7584] contract checking is too conservative for inherited contracts

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7584 --- Comment #10 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-05-03 08:53:53 PDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #0) > > IIRC, this is how contract inheritance works in Spec#. Spec# is (ahead of) > > state of the art in this area. > > Accordi

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #14 from deadalnix 2012-05-03 10:45:19 PDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > I apologize but I still think the confusion goes the other way. A good way to > arbiter this is to peruse the literature on the subject, as Walter suggested.

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #15 from Walter Bright 2012-05-03 11:07:27 PDT --- fizbuzzA(A a) { a.foo(); // A.foo's in contract is valid } If an instance of B is passed to fizbuzzA, then the a.foo() will call B.foo(), and either A.foo's in contract or B.f

[Issue 8016] Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8016 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-05-03 11:55:02 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/d420faebda45eb27596697594a61ecd2a6d3b3d7

[Issue 2962] ICE(glue.c) or bad codegen passing variable as template value parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962 --- Comment #41 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-05-03 11:55:14 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/816219255151628cfc2a8dc279f603420b7d931

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #16 from Don 2012-05-03 11:56:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > fizbuzzA(A a) { > a.foo(); // A.foo's in contract is valid > } > > If an instance of B is passed to fizbuzzA, then the a.foo() will call B.foo(), > and either

[Issue 8025] New: std.net.curl.del should return response body.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8025 Summary: std.net.curl.del should return response body. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Compon

[Issue 8016] Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8016 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 8023] (Regression git) Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8023 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-05-03 13:27:36 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/704977f1decd9b2d589bd40431f5d001b0aa6d4

[Issue 8016] Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8016 --- Comment #8 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-05-03 13:28:18 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/fb797c20e97ccfe18e0ec483dc8373e8028991d

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #17 from deadalnix 2012-05-03 13:44:36 PDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > fizbuzzA(A a) { > a.foo(); // A.foo's in contract is valid > } > > If an instance of B is passed to fizbuzzA, then the a.foo() will call B.foo(), > and

[Issue 8026] New: Fix or disallow randomShuffle() on fixed-sized arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8026 Summary: Fix or disallow randomShuffle() on fixed-sized arrays Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 8026] Fix or disallow randomShuffle() on fixed-sized arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8026 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com Severi

[Issue 8027] New: in contract is never checked for overrided functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8027 Summary: in contract is never checked for overrided functions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 8027] in contract is never checked for overrided functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8027 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 6856] Preconditions are not inherited

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adam.chrapkow...@gmail.com --- Comm

[Issue 8027] in contract is never checked for overrided functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8027 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID --- Comment #2 from timon.g

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #18 from Walter Bright 2012-05-03 15:37:00 PDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > As you can see in given code, fizbuzzA is an invalid piece of code waiting to > explode in your face. There is no bug in example #14. Please show one w

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #19 from Walter Bright 2012-05-03 15:46:03 PDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > This is the issue. WHY are they done based on the virtual type? > Checking the contracts based on static typing would detect logical errors in > the cal

Re: [Issue 5765] ^^ and << with BigInts

Hi Whats the status on a BigInt implementation of modular exponentiation?

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com --- Comment #20 from S

Re: [Issue 5765] ^^ and << with BigInts

Stian Pedersen: > Whats the status on a BigInt implementation of modular > exponentiation? Better to ask such questions in D.learn. The answer: I think there is no code yet to perform powmod efficiently in Phobos. Bye, bearophile

[Issue 8028] New: Templates sometimes-can/sometimes-can't access private symbols in same module

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8028 Summary: Templates sometimes-can/sometimes-can't access private symbols in same module Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Se

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #23 from Stewart Gordon 2012-05-03 18:21:44 PDT --- (In reply to comment #22) >> If you mean whether a given call is legal, then you could by the >> same argument insist that called method names must be resolved in >> the context

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #24 from Walter Bright 2012-05-03 18:50:03 PDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > >> If you mean whether a given call is legal, then you could by the > >> same argument insist that called method names must

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #25 from Stewart Gordon 2012-05-03 19:02:13 PDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > No, I'm not. This thread is about overriding, not introducing, functions. It's about introducing new legal inputs to a function. Which is conceptuall

[Issue 8026] Fix or disallow randomShuffle() on fixed-sized arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8026 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-05-03 19:55:52 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/565 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail beca

[Issue 8016] Methods defined in external object files when template alias parameter is involved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8016 --- Comment #9 from Walter Bright 2012-05-03 20:19:02 PDT --- The test cases were reverted because they failed in the auto-tester. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this m