f those duties can be reliably performed
remotely, then the operation is permissable.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jack Chomley
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 5:15 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.
At 07:47 AM 1/6/2008, you wrote:
Right here -
As I have pointed out, a number of ham activities that are claimed to be
for the purposes of propagation, especially PropNet and the HFLinkNet
appear to be illegal operations if they are being run automatically. It
is stretching the rules rather th
John,
The FCC Part 97 has no such reference. Could you please explain why you
are making such as statement?
73,
Rick, KV9U
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
> It is one thing to be " automatic " and " attended "
> and another to be " automatic " and " unattended ".
>
> The rules say you can't be
At 03:02 PM 1/5/2008, you wrote:
>Sorry if you misunderstood that. I am not sure where you saw me make
>such a claim and you might want to point me to such a statement.
Right here -
As I have pointed out, a number of ham activities that are claimed to be
for the purposes of propagation, especi
Sorry if you misunderstood that. I am not sure where you saw me make
such a claim and you might want to point me to such a statement.
My point frequently has been that unattended operation is not permitted
in the U.S. and Riley Hollingsworth has stated this publicly. What I
have said is that th
It is one thing to be " automatic " and " attended "
and another to be " automatic " and " unattended ".
The rules say you can't be " unattended "
At 11:19 AM 1/5/2008, you wrote:
>A station transmitter without a homo sapiens located at a receiver *at
>the location of the receiver* is
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
>
> Rick You keep lumping " automatic " together with " unattended "
>
> As you may know the ProrNet site says to NEVER leave your station
> untended as well as the WL2K site.
A station transmitter without a homo sapiens located at a receiver *at
the location of the r
Rick
You keep lumping " automatic " together with " unattended "
As you may know the ProrNet site says to NEVER leave
your station untended as well as the WL2K site.
I am just talking about sending the FLARQ "beacon" while in the shack.
On Jan 4, 2008 11:09 PM, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> The FCC is pretty clear on the definition of a beacon.
>
> 97.3 Definitions/ (9) Beacon/. An amateur station transmitting
> communications for the purposes o
The FCC is pretty clear on the definition of a beacon.
97.3 Definitions/ (9) Beacon/. An amateur station transmitting
communications for the purposes of observation of propagation and
reception or other related experimental activities.
Here are the frequency bands that they may be operated auto
At 10:56 AM 1/5/2008, you wrote:
>My Question, is a beacon a beacon if is maned, or does
>it have to be unmaned to be a beacon.
>For me my beacon has not be on the air without being
>here at the PC. So do we scrip the testing or find a
>spot up on 10m.
>
>Russell NC5O
>
>=
>IN GOD
My Question, is a beacon a beacon if is maned, or does
it have to be unmaned to be a beacon.
For me my beacon has not be on the air without being
here at the PC. So do we scrip the testing or find a
spot up on 10m.
Russell NC5O
=
IN GOD WE TRUST !
=
Russell Blai
12 matches
Mail list logo