Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread o.
Thank you Juergen, you are of course right. 73 Omar YK1AO - Original Message - From: dl8le To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:11 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group Per definition the DIGITALRADIO GROUP is "A me

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread Jim Dear
Thank you, Juregen. Jim W5LOG dl8le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Per definition the DIGITALRADIO GROUP is "A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes, applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on the air activity." The ongoi

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread dg6ygd
100 % agree This is no place to discuss failure of fcc or to fight each other. If you have problems with bandwidth or unattended stations please discuss with fcc for solutions - not with other hams which everytime have different opinions. Read and accept the facts given by your authority, perhaps

[digitalradio] Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread dl8le
Per definition the DIGITALRADIO GROUP is "A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes, applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on the air activity." The ongoing discussion about legal or formal topics since a couple of weeks with constant repeating of all the ol

[digitalradio] Digitalradio group traffic load

2007-04-19 Thread Andrew O'Brien
The digital radio group is currently experiencing about a 50% increase in the message volume due to an explosion of interest in the use of JT65A digital mode on HF. The digitalradio group remains a group dedicated to the discussion of all digital radio modes despite the intensive interest in JT65A